Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Change We Can Believe In

Posted by on Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:41 AM

A local developer is thinking about running for mayor of Seattle—but not to worry. He's one of those green developers.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
He's still better than Nickles...for all the hemming and hawing you do about the man, you're always going to vote for the chubby bastard when it comes down to it.
Posted by Bellevue Ave on November 20, 2008 at 9:47 AM
2
Why the assumption that being a developer is bad? I am not specifically familiar with THIS developer...but in a city that is yearning for greater density, for modernization, for better transit and parks and livability, I just don't understand the demonization of business or development.

Specific examples of bad business and bad development I get...but a general criticism of it seems counterproductive.
Posted by Timothy on November 20, 2008 at 9:50 AM
3
Why is he better than Nickels?

Because he *admits* he's a developer?

Nickels has put together a coalition of bike folks, enviros, labor, and developers. Usually big city mayors just hook up with the developers.

But here Hizzoner is smart and has this green-green($$$) alliance going. And by putting viaduct and roads things up to a vote, he's managed to be pro roads, but avoided the "he loves roads" rap that otherwise would be doom in Seattle.
Posted by PC on November 20, 2008 at 9:55 AM
4
Greg Smith would be an improvement over Greg Nickels. I have no doubt about that.
Posted by Hernandez on November 20, 2008 at 9:59 AM
5
Talk about eliminating the middleman!

Posted by Mr. X on November 20, 2008 at 10:15 AM
6
Mr. X for the win.
Posted by tomasyalba on November 20, 2008 at 10:29 AM
7
Green development is actually pretty amazing. It's the way most developers are going, and to try and be smug about it is wrong.

You should be stoked that Seattle is leading in green building, and requiring strict regulations. Green building aren't a farce, they are pretty amazing when you know all the work that goes into it.
Posted by Original Monique on November 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM
8
*buildings
Posted by Original Monique on November 20, 2008 at 11:14 AM
9
Sure he is.

I have nothing against the LEEDS revolution, but think we should examine all candidates for mayor with a very very fine toothed comb.

Preferably one not used to untangle puppy hair snarls.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM
10
Right! And I'm one of Santa's elves. I've noticed a trend where conspicuous consumption is somehow labeled green.
Posted by Vince on November 20, 2008 at 11:58 AM
11
I'd vote for him. Finally we can cut out the middleman.
Posted by Greg on November 20, 2008 at 1:49 PM
12
I have a tremendous amount of respect for Greg Smith, and am interested in hearing more about his mayoral platform.

Nickels is merely adequate, and his time in the sun was over long ago. He has the local politico machine locked up, but I thing the voting masses could care less about all the political chits he's owed. We deserve a better mayor.
Posted by nater on November 20, 2008 at 2:47 PM
13
I'd vote for Mr. Smith over Mr. Nickels.
Posted by rgr that on November 20, 2008 at 5:24 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy