Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, November 17, 2008

Warning!

Posted by on Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:10 PM

This second trailer has me concerned. Mightily concerned.

 

Comments (34) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Why?
Posted by Chris on November 17, 2008 at 8:13 PM
2
eh, a TOS prequel was a lame lame idea to start with.
Posted by Iain on November 17, 2008 at 8:16 PM
3
Dude you care about this?
Posted by Mr. Poe on November 17, 2008 at 8:25 PM
4
Fanboys come in two flavors: the reactionary ones who can't deal with change, and the open-minded ones who welcome it. The latter have more fun.
Posted by Simac on November 17, 2008 at 8:33 PM
5
Here, just as a favor, I'm going to save you a lot of lost sleep and worry.

It sucks.

You're welcome.
Posted by Srsly, no matter what, it's gonna suck on November 17, 2008 at 8:33 PM
6
I was going to watch this but it says I have to get the latest QuickTime.

As you know, the Obama Administration supports only Open Data formats -- not high priced proprietary technology.


Posted by John Bailo on November 17, 2008 at 8:39 PM
7
The only part that scared me was "Buckle up."
Posted by Explorer on November 17, 2008 at 8:42 PM
8
Mr. Poe, they can't all be great depression 2 posts.

The car chase right at the begining. It made me sad.
Posted by Jonathan Golob on November 17, 2008 at 8:49 PM
9
Dude, you scare too easily.

Embrace change. It ain't like they're making Kirk gay or something.
Posted by James on November 17, 2008 at 8:53 PM
10
the only thing keeping me from wanting to see this is the fact that Kirk inexplicably looks like Zack Efron. Although, I guess it's strangely fitting, seeing as how Zack Efron is an alien.
Posted by danhowes on November 17, 2008 at 8:57 PM
11
@8,

I know what you mean. They forgot to put Jar Jar Binks in the passenger seat, and they didn't even try to explain Kirk's unusually high midichlorian count.
Posted by the phantom enterprise on November 17, 2008 at 9:04 PM
12
doo doo doo. doo doo doo. shit blowing up. people having sex. doo doo doo. doo doo doo.
Posted by matt on November 17, 2008 at 9:23 PM
13
What, the fact that little Jimmy Kirk can so blithely destroy what would in his time be a fucking 270 year old antique sports car? Or the fact that apparently people are still using petroleum-powered internal combustion engines in the 23rd Century? Or the fact we see him experience the first of umpteen bazillion hanging-by-his-fingernails-from-a-gaping-precipice situations he'll have over the course of his life?

I feel for you Jonathan, but given that I've already lived through every permutation and perversion of "Star Trek" since the first airing of "Man Trap" more than 42 years ago, I'm just going to chalk this up to yet another reinterpretation of Roddenberry's vision, and frankly, probably not even the worst (Hello! "ST:V"? "ST: Nemesis"?).

So, buck up lil Trekker - after all, it's JUST a TV show.

{justatvshowjustatvshowjustatvshow}
Posted by COMTE on November 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM
14
It's hard when your imaginary friends let you down.
Posted by Zander on November 17, 2008 at 9:36 PM
15
I have to admit though, this review of early footage on AICN sounds promising.

Posted by the phantom enterprise on November 17, 2008 at 9:45 PM
16
The opening scene of silly boy-Kirk precociousness is lame, and a waste of a perfectly good antique corvette.

The rest... I'll reserve judgement. I still have my hopes up.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on November 17, 2008 at 9:47 PM
17
Simon Pegg looks fantastic, that's good enough for me. Love the accent.
Posted by wench on November 17, 2008 at 9:49 PM
18
The thing is, it is hard when your imaginary friends let you down. I think fanboys follow the doings of our imaginary heroes with as much empathy and enjoyment as ancient Greeks and Romans got from stories about their wacky soap opera gods.

I'm with you 8 and 11. This is all very Phantom Movie.

JJ Abrams is a menace, and he must be stopped.
Posted by Judah on November 17, 2008 at 9:50 PM
19
Screw Quicktime..
Posted by Good Grief on November 17, 2008 at 10:13 PM
20
The trailer opens on a silly, silly note and quickly devolves from there. Dear Lord this film will be bad.
Posted by James B. on November 17, 2008 at 10:42 PM
21
Dude, we get to see Kirk do some fuckin'!
Posted by Bub on November 17, 2008 at 10:44 PM
22
Random impressions: the car/cliff stunt is just stupid. Then the motorcycle ride induced a Top Gun flashback. Why is Vulcan in such a fashion rut? I am somewhat worried that this Kirk might have a little "Dubya" doctrine thing going on. "Buckle up"? Why not just have him say "Let's Roll"? It looks like they gave the Jar Jar role to Scotty. And does anyone really think Kirk wears briefs? Maybe boxer briefs. Whatever this trailer is selling, I'm not interested.

Also, what about Captain Pike? And will the Klingons be white dudes with beards or black dudes with beards?
Posted by asteria on November 17, 2008 at 11:08 PM
23
The trailer seems to cast Kirk as some sort of bad boy who needs to find his way. I've started rewatching the original series and that interpretation couldn't be more wrong. Despite Kirk's way with the ladies, it's still clear that he takes his job seriously. One of the first episodes alludes to his teaching at the academy before becoming captain of the Enterprise.
Posted by keshmeshi on November 17, 2008 at 11:47 PM
24
So long as Spock does well, all the rest is gravy.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 18, 2008 at 12:03 AM
25
The thing that gets me is the primitive hull construction method shown in the first trailer. Talk about retro. You want me to believe a bunch of welders eyeball that hull together plate by plate outdoors with little hand torches? And this in a time period with the technology to manipulate matter as energy into any form desired? Get real.

Posted by suspending suspension of disbelief on November 18, 2008 at 1:12 AM
26
My fangirl heart is squealing with joy!
Posted by tikimaroon on November 18, 2008 at 1:13 AM
27
I saw the trailer and thought "Gee this movie is just like every other piece of shit that comes out of Hollywood" The only way you could tell it was somehow Star Trek were the Vulcans and the insignia on the uniforms.

And Kirk destoryed a 300 year old Corvette? Kirk should now die in this movie. This movie will be released in May 2009 and out on DVD by the middle of June. So save your money! You can pick it up in the $4.99 DVD Discount Bin a couple of weeks after release.

Star Trek died with Roddenberry: LET IF FUCKING DIE OFF ALREADY!!!!
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on November 18, 2008 at 1:33 AM
28
You guys do realize the guy who created "Felicity" is now in charge of resurrecting the Star Trek franchise.

JJ Abrams is going to ruin this. It should be a new crew, with new personalities and new mission but JJ Abrams has a little problem with making anything new. Basically everything he does is a remake with overacting. Just looked at his track record:

Mission Impossible III: a remake of a TV show with Tom Cruise staring really hard and calling it acting.

Cloverfield: Godzilla with handheld cameras.

Alias: A stupid version of La Femme Nikita stretched over a weak on-going narrative.

Lost: Gilligan's Island remade with no ending.



@15 please don't read Ain't It Cool News and stop reading Fark too.
Posted by Andy on November 18, 2008 at 3:23 AM
29
I'm almost positive that the music is from the 'Children of Dune' soundtrack. What's up with that?
Posted by Stacy in Austin on November 18, 2008 at 7:07 AM
30
Ha ha ha, you nellies sound just like the bloviating retards and trolls in the comment threads at AICN.
Posted by laughing at you on November 18, 2008 at 7:30 AM
31
I expect better from the sloggers. Only a fool judges a movie based on a 2 minute trailer.

@25 get a grip. I saw the Rocketeer with my father when I was a kid. Halfway through the movie he looks over at me and ask if the Rocketeer's boots are made of asbestos, since they don't catch on fire. I wanted to slap him.

@30. Agreed.
Posted by Rotten666 on November 18, 2008 at 8:16 AM
32
Whatever. I knew I wouldn't be watching this the second they cast Zachary Quinto and his fucking face as Spock.
I'm sure he's a decent actor and a perfectly nice person, but I cannot stand the sight of his goddamn face.
Posted by Rachel on November 18, 2008 at 8:39 AM
33
"Mightily concerned"? About what? That this movie might ruin the Star Trek brand or make it suddenly uncool if the movie bombs?

Things were going so well, too...! What a shame if the franchise actually faltered or made a rare misstep!
Posted by Your Name Here on November 18, 2008 at 10:27 AM
34
@33

Have you ever heard Shatner and Nimoy's album they made together? It's awesome.
Posted by the phantom enterprise on November 18, 2008 at 12:35 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy