Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

County Budget Cuts Are Going to Hurt

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM

Sixty-three people lined up in the hallway outside King County Council chambers yesterday to plead with the council to restore funding for their programs. There wasn't a bad cause among them--from advocates for the 146-year-old King County Fair to farmers whose success depends on the county-funded Puget Sound Fresh program to survivors of domestic violence who would be homeless if not for county-funded women's shelter programs, everyone who spoke made a good case that their program shouldn't be among those cut. Although many of the most undeniably essential programs have been placed in a metaphorical "lifeboat," their continued existence depends on the benevolence of the state legislature, from which the county is seeking new taxing authority. And with the legislature facing a $3.2 billion state budget shortfall of its own, King County may not be at the top of its priority list.

A lot more programs are proposed for cuts than the ones I wrote about here. Here are several that people spoke out for at yesterday's public hearing--the last public hearing the council will hold before approving the proposed King County budget.

The King County Agricultural Program. The county's agricultural program works to preserve farmland and protect farms from development pressure in rural King County. One of its best-known programs is Puget Sound Fresh, which supports local farmers, promotes community-supported agriculture, and supports farmers markets around the region. Wade Bennett, owner of Rockridge Orchards in Enumclaw, told the council that the agricultural program had helped transform local farms from "an endangered species.. to merely a threatened species," helping 4,000 King County farmers feed 100,000 people a year. The agricultural program, which costs $120,000 a year, could be eliminated.

The King County Crisis Clinic. The Crisis Clinic runs a suicide prevention program, helps people who are caregivers to the sick and disabled, directs people to emergency shelters, and helps people navigate the social justice system. Last year, Committee to End Homelessness Program Director Bill Block told the council, the clinic took 50 percent more calls seeking rental assistance and 21 percent more calls seeking help with heating and lighting bills. Services like the Crisis Clinic "keep our residents' lives intact," Block said.

New Futures. New Futures operates on-site in low-income apartment complexes in South King County, where the county's poverty and school failure rates are highest. They run after-school programs, mentor teens, provide community development services, and help kids and adults learn English. According to New Futures director Karma Kreizenbeck, who implored the council to preserve the program's county funding, 92 percent of the agency's clients are recent immigrants.

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project. Sims's proposed budget would completely eliminate funding for the NWIRP's domestic-violence investigation unit, which investigates immigrants' allegations of domestic violence; according to an NWIRP representative who spoke at this week's meeting, the group currently has 82 people on its waiting list.

Eastside Domestic Violence. This program, which serves north and east King County, provides crisis counseling, shelter, transitional housing, and support groups for victims of domestic violence, as well as community education and training. Several former domestic violence victims told the council that without ESDV, they would have been on the streets. "I felt trapped and didn’t know who to turn to or where to go since I had kept my situation a secret from my family and friends," said one young woman who had been a victim of domestic violence for five years. "Eastside Domestic Violence was a way out… Please do not take this way out away from women like me."

That's actually only the tiniest sampling of the worthy programs that are facing cuts. County residents can also say farewell to treatment, pre-release education and training for inmates to keep them from committing crimes again; the downtown emergency winter shelter; health care and assistance for poor women and children with HIV and AIDS; several county-run family planning clinics that provide birth control and routine PAP smears to poor women; rodent control; case management for people with tuberculosis; services for drug-addicted pregnant women and families; a program that monitors infectious diseases, like hanta virus and avian flu, spread by animals; and school-based dental care programs for children, among many other vital programs.) I've tried to come up with a bright side to all these cuts, and I can't. It's wholesale slaughter at King County. All I can say is, I'm glad I don't have their job.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (16) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This is devastating. Clearly the feds should kick money down to local governments so that they don't have to slash services. Cutting services during a recession amounts to pro-cyclical fiscal policy, in addition to the human cost. I think Obama is smart enough to realize this, so help is coming on January 20, if not sooner.
Posted by minderbender on November 11, 2008 at 5:14 PM
2
And which Democrats in power are advocating for a graduated income tax instead of a regressive sales tax? One that could stabilize our tax base while also increasing tax fairness? Almost no one. But hey! Thank god it's Democrats cutting human services, right? These groups lobbying the council should stop fighting over a smaller piece of the pie and start trying to elect politicians who will create a more just system.
Posted by Trevor on November 11, 2008 at 6:28 PM
3
How many people are going to lose their jobs?
Posted by six shooter on November 11, 2008 at 6:39 PM
4
Thanks Erica - your report is no pie in the blue sky crap - King County - simply put - will be in Bankruptcy next budget cycle.

They should be cutting bloated payrolls, some across the board cuts, and develop volunteer projects en mass. All salaries of all employees, 15 per cent slash of gross, effective tomorrow. Let unions sue.

And, so remember too, this is the first round of a three to 5 year cycle of slow and lower and lower revenue. Sorrowful tears will turn to blood letting.

Seattle might buy the county, cheap. Some gull feathers and shining pebbles? A gallon of chowder and a holly wreath???

Ron Sims is political toast too......
Posted by George on November 11, 2008 at 6:59 PM
5
Yeah really. Why wouldn't we bail out state/county/local governments before we bail out banks and insurance companies and car companies?
Posted by jrrrl on November 11, 2008 at 7:41 PM
6
#5

what do masses of paper shufflers create of real wealth?

Boxes full of scrap paper for the costly to maintain and store many boxes of paper ...

half of county govt. is a job scam - pay for political friends

cut and cut and cut some more

keep courts, cops, fire, 911, some roads, and .... get the fat out quickly or expire
Posted by James II on November 11, 2008 at 9:57 PM
7
10billion a month in Iraq....
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on November 11, 2008 at 10:15 PM
8
Put your hand up if you support a state income tax. Now everybody take a look around. You see how many hands are up? Not a lot, huh? Everybody with their hands down, think about why you want to keep sales and property taxes as our state's major revenue sources. Do you think that this system has advantages that outweigh the three major weaknesses? For reference, they are:

1. Revenues are highly unstable due to fluctuations in the economy
2. Regressive taxation hurts on poor people the most
3. Sales taxes are only deductible from federal income taxes for people who itemize - and only for two years, unless Congress passes another extension

If we are going to get serious about shoring up the state, city, and county governments, we need a state income tax.
Posted by Greg on November 12, 2008 at 9:57 AM
9
Greg, I think it's a choose one or the other, not both. Otherwise you might as well live in California.
Posted by Bellevue Ave on November 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM
10
Uh, folks? Lack of money is not the county's problem. They have gobs of it. This budget is $4.9 billion - that's up from $3.35 billion from only 3 years ago.

I know, I know... I'm a Democrat, too, and as a Democrats our knee-jerk reaction to a government in trouble is to declare "They need more taxes, stat!" But this is one case where it just isn't so.
Posted by Lionel Hutz on November 12, 2008 at 11:52 AM
11
So why are police budgets going up if there are cutbacks.

They should not be sacrosanct.
Posted by Will in Seattle on November 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM
12
@11 - Good point. An even better point is, why are there any cutbacks at all if they have more money (a lot more) than they used to? Where is it going?
Posted by Lionel Hutz on November 12, 2008 at 12:08 PM
13
@10, 11, 12: King County's total budget has gone up in recent years, but most of that money is in dedicated funds (park levy, Media 1 levy, mental health sales tax), so it can't be used for anything other than the purpose for which it was collected. The general fund budget (about 2/3 property tax, 1/3 sales tax) is down this year to about $644 million. That's the money that pays for cops, courts, and general government. The King County Sheriff's budget isn't going up, it's going down by about 10 percent.
Posted by J.R. on November 12, 2008 at 1:03 PM
14
@13 - $644 million for the general fund is still a 9% increase in three years - it was $599 in 2006. And since that time, all the levies the county passed - the ones you mentioned, plus AFIS, Flood Control, Ferry District, Transit Now and the Human Services and Veterans Levy - should be lessening, not increasing, the pressure on the general fund. By offloading more functions to "dedicated revenues" there are fewer functions relying solely on the general fund for revenues. In this regard, the county has been wildly successful. Yet even still, the county cuts threaten functions partially paid for by new dedicated revenues - human services, transit, etc.

It is a simple fact that we are all paying more to County government than we ever have and the County is proposing to provide much less service. We'll have the best god-damn gold-plated sewage treatment plant money can buy, though. Enjoy it, because the county is clearly prioritizing that over say, public safety.

By the way, what year are we in in the 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness? That effort appears doomed to churn out more press releases than housing units.
Posted by Lionel Hutz on November 12, 2008 at 1:39 PM
15
@14: Good points. I think AFIS has always been levy-funded and the ferry district is mainly new service (apart from the Elliott Bay Water Taxi). Also, Sound Transit is a special district, not King County. But the flood district should have freed up some county money.

Curiously enough, the Mental Health sales tax funds have to be used (under state law) on new programs, so KC can't use the money to fund it's existing programs that are in danger of getting cut.

Wastewater treatment is considered a utility under state law. Which means it's funded by user fees and King County can raise rates at will to cover costs. To call it a "priority" is misleading because it doesn't take money away from any other function--or contribute to any other function--of county government.
Posted by J.R. on November 12, 2008 at 2:25 PM
16
@15 - I said TransitNow, not Sound Transit.

I'll tell you why you're wrong on the rest of it next Wednesday over a beer. Cheers.
Posted by Lionel Hutz on November 12, 2008 at 4:17 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use