


... Want to do with your tax dollars?
Find out on Slog, where we'll be posting exclusive video of the Stranger Election Control Board's interview on I-985, Tim Eyman's latest initiative.
City staff spent 18 months and about $300,000 making the changes downtown.Yet again, the same officials who spent our money are giving us their own data they say proved they were successful. I suppose Tim Eyman writes his own report card too, and gives himself straight As. One of the realities of signal timing is that you have to favor traffic going in one direction over the other. They tout improving north-south speeds, but that makes east-west traffic wait longer. Yet there is no mention of that. SDOT speaks of this in generalities on their website, but where are the detailed numbers? But the larger question is, what is being compared? Forty percent of what? Over what time period? They might be able to favor a given corridor and show some greater flow for a few months, but what happens to the big picture? Not just that one corridor, but the whole system? Is it less congested, or more? I've driven downtown this week and I can tell you, it is not less congested. Should I believe Tim Eyman or my own lying eyes? And most of all, what about induced demand? When bus riders and carpoolers and people staying home notice a slight improvement in traffic flow, some of them will decide now it's worth it to drive. They will fill up any and all gains in throughput with more cars. Look at Los Angeles. LA is the all time champion of ultra-optimized timed traffic lights, and their traffic only gets worse. The better they make their streets run, the more people drive. I call that a waste of $300,000 and 18 months. And Tim Eyman wants to dump even more money down that hole, and never take responsibility for the outcome.
Comments (19) RSS