<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>










































































































































































































 
	 	 











































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Re: Emily White Strikes Again
    
      by Jen Graves</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=935337&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Re: Emily White Strikes Again
    
      by Jen Graves</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:30:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#939205]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#939205]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Scott Dow]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[where is your follow up Jen?<br />
I think that you are right on.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Scott Dow]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:04:17 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#938649]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#938649]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jim Demetre]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I just read the piece myself and couldn't agree more with your sentiments, Jen. Ms. White never explains what distinguishes good criticism from bad and what - if anything - these distinctions might have to do with the phenomenon she is describing. Her essay is just the kind of lazy, middle-weight, middle-brow fluff that bores readers and has contributed the extinction of the species Criticus artis 'Dailyi'.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Jim Demetre]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:32:50 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935858]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935858]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[fARTing]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@6:  I read A.L. at the New Yorker for the pleasure of reading his amazing writing.  There was once a movie critic whose opinion I followed because whatever his opinion of a movie, I determined that my opinion of said movie would be the opposite.  Thus, helping to avoid seeing some bad movies.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by fARTing]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:55:18 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935741]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935741]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I just read that at lunch.  I too like Emily White, but never liked the former art critic.<br />
<br />
It's like that A.L. moron at the New Yorker who does movie reviews - I've seen most of the movies they "a distinguished critic" review and A.L. is almost always WRONG.<br />
<br />
I don't care how fun they are at parties or how many in jokes they put in their scrivenings, a critic needs to be able to reach most of the people that read their criticisms.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Will in Seattle]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:20:47 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935604]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935604]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Comment Deleted]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[<p><b>COMMENT DELETED:</b> Sock-puppetry<br /><em>We'd rather not moderate your comments, but off-topic, gratuitously inflammatory, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate remarks may be removed, and repeat offenders may be banned from commenting. We never censor comments based on ideology. Thanks to all who add to the conversation on Slog.</em></p>
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Comment Deleted]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:17:00 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935498]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935498]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[John Scott Tynes]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I did read her article and thought it was seriously lightweight: underreported, vaguely written, and kinda lazy.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by John Scott Tynes]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:38:30 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935459]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935459]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Billy the Cid]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[No. It should be addressed in the body of the article, right up front, very first thing. To read the story without that critical piece of information—without knowing her 800-pound bias—is to be misled.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Billy the Cid]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:19:38 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935438]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935438]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[MK]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[If you read her bio it does disclose that fact that she worked at the PI. Is her credibility unannihilated?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by MK]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:09:03 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Re: Emily White Strikes Again]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935393]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/06/re_emily_white_strikes_again/#935393]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Billy the Cid]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[More distressingly—didn't White used to work for one of those dailies?<br />
<br />
And didn't she leave under unhappy circumstances less than a year ago? And doesn't her failure to disclose that pretty much annihilate her credibility?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Billy the Cid]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:55:04 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




