<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>










































































































































































































 
	 	 











































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Saddlebacking
    
      by Dan Savage</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=932467&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Saddlebacking
    
      by Dan Savage</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:45:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#1863724]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#1863724]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[sex toy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["If "barebacking" is unprotected sex, "saddlebacking" is sex with a condom"<br />
I myself do like the "barebacking" term much more and also the "barebacking" as an act too!<br />
Even the newest and thinnest condoms can't compare with the "barebacking" sex<br />
BUT! Of course, there are certain rules - it's possible only with the "approved" partner =)<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1823498">sex toy</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:07:10 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#1116551]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#1116551]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[qwerty]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The Saddleback church is some evangelistic church somewhere. Their young female members preserve their (vaginal) virginity for their wedding night by engaging in Gomorrahian acts with their boyfriends. Hence: saddlebacking
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by qwerty]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:22:22 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#992973]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#992973]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Loqi]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Sometimes, the obvious answer is the way to go. While some of these definitions are quite funny, they just don't have the staying power we're looking for.<br />
<br />
Saddlebacking is the opposite of barebacking. It's still funny, when a guy's got a megachurch named after condom sex (or vice-versa). Even a mildly naughty definition will eventually force him to change the name of his church. But only if it sticks!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Loqi]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:34:42 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#938808]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#938808]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[inigo]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I would think that saddleback is when you lose your condom in your partner's ass.  I want my saddle back.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by inigo]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:25:24 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#936090]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#936090]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[violet_dagrinder]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@1<br />
<br />
Yeah, I've heard/used the term in reference to vaginal unprotected sex as well. <br />
<br />
While I'd like to see "saddlebacking" refer to something negative a la Santorum, it does seem like an obviously great term for protected sex, which does need a term. So.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by violet_dagrinder]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:12:42 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935329]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935329]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[stuck in boston]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@1<br />
I've heard barebacking refer to both anal and vaginal sex without a condom. So saddlebacking should be vaginal OR anal sex with a condom.<br />
Plus women are more derelict in condom use than gay men and could use a fun word for safe sex as badly as the gays. <br />
After all, wouldn't you rather tell a partner who wants to have sex without a condom (gay/straight/anal/vaginal) "No way I'm a saddleback guy/girl/MTF/FTM/ETC" than "I only play safe" or the clinical "I only use condoms"?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by stuck in boston]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:23:10 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935166]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935166]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Stella]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I think that "saddlebacking" as a term for protected, safe sex, of any kind is anti-warren because dogmatically, the only sex allowed in the saddleback world is that of procreative sex within the confines of heterosexual marriage.  So, if a condom is used, particularly in an act of premarital, extramarital, or post-marital, or can't marital sex, it is thumbing your nose at warren, et al.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Stella]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:35:51 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935079]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#935079]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[it's all our fault]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["LESS THAN A QUARTER of men who have sex with men surveyed in San Francisco used condoms"<br />
<br />
As a heterosexual I feel so guilty that we haven't devoted the resources to curing AIDS.<br />
Must Do More!!!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by it's all our fault]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:23:15 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934822]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934822]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Patrick Colvin]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["Online-only" should have a hyphen, as it is two adjectives used together to describe a noun. <br />
<br />
It is not a split infinitive (where a word comes between a "to" and its verb: "to boldly go where no one has gone before") and there are arguments in academic circles as to whether split infinitives matter at all. I mean, seriously, do we really want to hear, "to go boldly where no one has gone before?"<br />
<br />
It's a bit like the ending-a-sentence-with-a-preposition issue.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Saddlebacking: anal sex with condoms? Works for me.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Patrick Colvin]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:19:30 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934667]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934667]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[i love this game.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[yep.  buttsecks with a condom = saddlebacking.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by i love this game.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:47:03 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934644]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934644]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[TeaHag]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Isn't Rick Warren always going on about how he loves the gays because he looks after people who are dying from AIDS? Naming a safe-sex activity after him will only stroke his ego.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by TeaHag]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:17:16 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934632]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934632]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[StC]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["the implicit assuption that sex without a condom is somehow more fun and more exciting."<br />
<br />
That assumption is implicit because it is true.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by StC]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:05:43 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934610]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934610]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[back to grammar school]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[oops, forgot a set of quotation marks. should be:<br />
<br />
"this is only online in Seattle and no where else." I wasn't kidding about going back to school.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by back to grammar school]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:00:00 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934609]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934609]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[back to grammar school]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[josh: is "online only" a split infinitive?  because "only" can be read two ways, and the meaning changes between "in Seattle you will only find this online" and this is only online in Seattle and no where else."
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by back to grammar school]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:58:44 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934606]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934606]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mmb]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[of course. i forgot about dan's syndication. thank you everyone.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by mmb]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:55:42 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934496]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934496]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Abby]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[In Seattle, I believe, it is online-only due to there being no new Stranger this week. In, say, Denver, you can find the column in print, but in Seattle you can only find it online.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Abby]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:02:31 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934492]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934492]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[josh]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@7 The column is in print in other cities, but online-only in Seattle because the Stranger didn't publish a print edition this week.<br />
<br />
(will copy edit for snacks)
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by josh]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:01:12 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934478]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934478]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mmb]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Anthony H or Amy Kate Horn, emeritus: Please explain how this week's Savage Love is "online only in Seattle." I couldn't get passed that first sentence. Am I having a senior moment or is there something about the internet I don't know? Putting a sub domain of /seattle after your website does not mean your web browser knows to block a page if you live in outside of Seattle. Or does it?!<br />
<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by mmb]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:56:09 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934423]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934423]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[alanw]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Saddlebacking is ANAL sex with a condom. Fundies will still hate it because it's in the no-no, and the definition still fits.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by alanw]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:29:04 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934409]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934409]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Wow.  I am so out of touch.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Will in Seattle]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:23:03 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934287]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#934287]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Abby]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[My only problem with this definition is that it's a really positive activity, and should Warren be associated with something positive?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Abby]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:43:00 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932612]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932612]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Y.F.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["...And while saddles take away some of the thrill of riding bareback they do come equipped with stirrups, straps, and ropes."<br />
<br />
So "saddlebacking" is <i>safe</i> kinky sex?<br />
<br />
Hmm, I had originally thought of "saddlebacking" as riding a sex partner around the room like a polo pony during an orgy. I mean used in a sentence you could say: "During the last chukker, I remounted a Theta Chi and put the losers lead by scoring a field goal <i>while</i> I was rolling the Trojan."<br />
<br />
So "saddlebacking" is stirrups, bridles, straps, ropes <i>with</i> condoms. Okay, I'll vote for <i>Stuck In Boston</i>.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Y.F.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:16:09 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932587]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932587]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[thoughtcriminal]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Saddlebacking: talking out of both sides of your mouth while being rimmed.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by thoughtcriminal]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:05:21 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Saddlebacking]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932557]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/05/saddlebacking/#932557]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Dan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Wait, if "bareback" is condomless <i>anal</i> sex, what do you call penile-vaginal intercourse without a condom? I always thought "bareback" was orientation/orifice agnostic.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Dan]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:58:17 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




