<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>










































































































































































































 
	 	 











































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Science at Work!
    
      by Paul Constant</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=809601&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Science at Work!
    
      by Paul Constant</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:30:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#813473]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#813473]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Greg Barnes]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@5:  The I-90 bridge sank because they left open the hatches in the concrete pontoons over the Thanksgiving weekend and a huge storm came in.  Storm = waves = water in the hollow compartments = non-floating bridge.<br />
<br />
So, no over-engineering problem, just a stupid contractor.  An earlier version of the Hood Canal Bridge sank for similar reasons, so there simply no excuse.  But it sure was entertaining to watch on my TV.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Greg Barnes]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:47:30 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#813439]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#813439]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[princeofspace]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[man, i was in a similar position as those poor fools recently when i was working for fedex ground.  they obviously should have closed the damn truck before taking off.  sometimes that stuff doesn't get communicated to the driver effectively, and i very nearly got stuck driving to somewhere in the flyover states once or twice.  to be fair, the drivers are generally under a lot of pressure to get shit delivered as fast as possible, so i imagine that this type of thing is pretty common.  blame yourselves for every time you've bitched about delivery time.  it's all humans dealing with it, and we're all equally fallible.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by princeofspace]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:46:25 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#810004]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#810004]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Medina]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Actually, it wasn't quite by the book.  The designer was using a new theory about bridges.  He was chosen because the other prospective traditional designs were too costly.  <br />
<br />
Frankly, it wasn't poor engineering as much as trying to cut corners with new (and unproven) theories.  <br />
<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Medina]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:43:16 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809975]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809975]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[David Wright]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Apres_moi @ 5:<br />
<br />
Calling the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse a case of "poor engineering" is slightly misleading. The engineers on that bridge did everyting right "by the book". The problem was that "the book" for civil engineering at the time didn't consider dynamic stresses. Only wing desigeners worried about them at the time, and they had never caused any structural failures before.<br />
<br />
Of course, you could call any engineering that doesn't account for all the physics "poor", but the connotation to the lay reader is different. And no, neither I nor my relatives worked on that bridge. I'm just clarifying for the record.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by David Wright]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:26:14 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809905]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809905]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[apres_moi]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Jonathon,  I was thinking the same thing as well before I saw your comment. Newton's first law of motion as well as relativity.  <br />
<br />
Clearly, this isn't as much as "Doh" moment as the over-engineering of the I90 bridge back in the early 90s that caused it to collapse. And let us not forget the major "doh" moment in WA state history where Galloping Gertie (Tacoma Narrows Bridge) collapsed thanks to poor engineering
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by apres_moi]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:53:44 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809872]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809872]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Sure, I'm Joking.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[<br />
This is the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Disaster high school physics film of the new century.<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Sure, I'm Joking.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:38:34 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809865]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809865]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Bill Nye]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Science rules!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Bill Nye]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:30:55 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809786]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809786]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jonathan Golob]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This also serves as a reasonably decent example of relativity.<br />
<br />
At least from a particular point of view. ;p
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Jonathan Golob]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:57:24 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Science at Work!]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809766]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/12/03/science_at_work/#809766]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[bearseatbeats]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[HAHA!<br />
<br />
What, do they not teach physics in high school anymore? Hilarious.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by bearseatbeats]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:50:27 -0800</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




