http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/11/19/port_commissioner_gael_tarlet Comments On: Port Commissioner Gael Tarleton: We Didn't Raise Taxes by Erica C. Barnett en-us Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:45:00 -0800 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Down the road is a different strategy: I want to let the people vote on whether the Port should use its taxing authority for big community investments. Some examples where Port ballot initiatives might be in the cards include having the Port help fund the Viaduct replacement, or voting to support the Puget Sound Partnership.

When the Port isn't losing money, it's able to plow dollars back into environmental, transportation, and port security improvements for King County. It also doesn't have to resort to layoffs...when the public and private sectors are besieged with deficits as they are now, all our citizens and families suffer.

A public agency is supposed to invest in the public good. A perfect example is the Eastside Rail Corridor - the Port used its taxing authority to agree to buy the corridor with King County tax dollars. King County taxpayers will be paying about $10 million a year in debt service for about 20 years (once the bonds to purchase the corridor can actually be sold). In return? King County brings a private rail corridor back into public ownership, which otherwise was going to be sold off in chunks to the highest private bidders.

Thanks, RonK, for helping give accurate information about the Port's taxing authority. Another myth that's out there is that no ports outside of Washington State have taxing authority. Not true. There are 39 other ports in the nation that have taxing authority.

Government agencies need taxing authority. That's how governments build public assets that no one else will build - seaport terminals, roads, light rail, bridges, airports, schools, public utilities, and the list goes on. The real issue is not the authority. The issue is whether the people have a say in having the money spent on things they care about.

2009 is going to be a very tough year for our families and communities. My focus is on Jobs First - sustaining our businesses and communities through the recession and laying the foundation for clean trade and green, family-wage jobs for the future.
Posted by Gael]]> Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:18:30 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Trevor]]> Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:53:46 -0800 The Stranger the fact that the Port of Seattle can tap property taxes—unlike every other port on the West Coast except for the other 74 port districts in the State of Washington—undoubtedly has something to do with that.
Posted by RonK, Seattle]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:16:36 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Will in Seattle]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:58:10 -0800 The Stranger
I donate most of the alcohol, so I should know ...

I think she meant the cake and cookie options when she referred to raspberry framboise, but we did all go out to get bubble tea afterwards!
Posted by Will in Seattle]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:56:47 -0800 The Stranger
First, if you ive in King County, the Port levy accounts for maybe 2% of your property tax bill ... so if they jack that up by 11%, your taxes increase by about 0.22%.

Except that a big chunk of the projected 11% revenue increase results from new construction added to the tax base. Unless you are riding one of those 20-odd highrise cranes on the skyline, this component doesn't cost you.

The Port did lower the levy rate, so the Port share of your taxes will rise only if the value of your property rose more than about 3% (roughly the amount the Port levy mill rate decreased).

And other tapped-out units of government really are tapping the Port's "profit" to fund projects like the eastside "rails to trails" corridor. Bike on that, willya?

Posted by RonK, Seattle]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:41:26 -0800 The Stranger Posted by ECB]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:58:35 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Huh]]> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:50:06 -0800 The Stranger Posted by john]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:57:36 -0800 The Stranger
also there's nobody else at our meetings under 30. :( i feel alone
Posted by asdf]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:42:48 -0800 The Stranger Posted by jackseattle]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:23:00 -0800 The Stranger Posted by I worked with her, I know]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:47:34 -0800 The Stranger Posted by I worked with her, I know]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:44:25 -0800 The Stranger
http://www.nashvilleistalking.com/node/8…

You're welcome. All that's missing is him being a youth pastor.

Posted by paul in kirkland]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:15:16 -0800 The Stranger Posted by elenchos]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:12:36 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Your Famous Name Here]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:13:03 -0800 The Stranger
What? Huh? Since when are government agencies supposed to turn a profit?

Usually, the inability to profit off of an essential good or service is the reason why government is the one providing it.

And Erica: You know I adore you, and I hate to nitpick, but what's up with "the black-pantsuited Tarleton"? Pantsuits have been common woman's apparel since the 1970's. Many of them are black. Why make a special note of it?

If she had shown up in a hoop skirt, or dressed as a poodle, I could see commenting on it. But a pantsuit? It just seems odd to me.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:43:17 -0800 The Stranger