Comments On: One Nation, Completely Obsessed by Dan Savage http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2008/11/13/one_nation_completely_obsesse Comments On: One Nation, Completely Obsessed by Dan Savage en-us Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:00:00 -0800 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Lee]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:54:09 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Leslie N.]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:09:25 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by F]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:40:29 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Zeitgeist]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:05:51 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]>
That lawyer is proof the California Bar Exam isn't tough enough.
Posted by deanp]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:48:17 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]>
i've never been able to fathom the mind of a bigot. it seems to me that once you start talking about homosexuality as a nation wide concept all premises on which homosexuality can be reasonable discriminated against are defused. scalia, simply by recognizing ay soldiers, is debasing his entire view point. although, he does equate homosexuality with abortion.
Posted by douglas]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:58:33 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Your Name Here]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:53:31 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Abby]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:49:49 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Darcy]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:48:53 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by i knew i'd be dusting that one off at some point]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:47:05 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Nick]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:36:27 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]>
Can the government accept a statement for display in a playground, Justice Stephen G. Breyer asked, that says “don’t throw food at your brother” but not one that says “pull the dog’s tail”?

And what was the church’s position, Justice Antonin Scalia wanted to know, about “a monument to chocolate chip cookies”?


I bet Cookie W. Monster is in favor of a monument to cookies. I know I am.
Posted by Julie in Chicago]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:35:55 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Sleestak]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:33:54 -0800 The Stranger <![CDATA[Re: One Nation, Completely Obsessed]]> Posted by Jerry Bunny Buns]]> Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:22:42 -0800 The Stranger