<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>










































































































































































































 
	 	 











































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Amazon&apos;s Tea Party
    
      by Paul Constant</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=1772212&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Amazon&apos;s Tea Party
    
      by Paul Constant</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:15:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1775934]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1775934]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Gomez]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Depends on how many states enact internet taxes.  It seems like a lucrative option on paper, but NC just ran into the obvious hurdle: Major internet retailers can just pull the plug on doing business with them, and then their economy is out that potential revenue as businesses lose that e-business and the state then loses the taxes they would've gained at year's end from the business for that revenue... pronouncing the economic downtown (and loss in business tax revenue) every state's battling with.<br />
<br />
Like a lot of good ideas, it looks good on paper... not so much in practice.<br />
<br />
This never minds enforcing the law, which is a whole other can of worms.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1509816">Gomez</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:02:43 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1775659]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1775659]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Tax me please]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@1: Amazon has repeatedly stated that its objection is to a patchwork tax system, and supports a nationwide consistent mechanism to withhold taxes for the states (such as the Main Street Fairness Act).  They're not alone in this; there are 20-some states on board.<br>
<br>
I'm sure that Amazon has a pretty good grasp on the financial impact of cutting off its' affiliates program on a given state.  It may very well be that case that they have decided that the affiliates program brings in less profit than the necessary tax systems will cost to develop or acquire and operate.<br>
<br>
@11<br>
<br>
This is indeed about buying directly from Amazon.  Affiliates are people who link to Amazon products.  They're getting paid for the referral.  Sellers (people who sell products through Amazon) are a different issue.<br>
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Tax me please]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:43:26 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1774921]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1774921]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@12 - they can be sued for discrimination then.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503038">Will in Seattle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:51:39 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773854]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773854]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[dr. dipshit]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Here's a little list that might help this conversation:<br>
<br>
Amazon has cut affiliate ties to:<br>
Rhode Island<br>
Hawaii<br>
North Carolina<br>
(and sent a threatening letter to California)<br>
<br>
Blue Nile has cut ties to:<br>
North Carolina<br>
Rhode Island<br>
<br>
(This comment cribbed from a PSBJ article.)
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by dr. dipshit]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:27:58 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773545]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773545]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[also]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Hello?  <br />
<br />
#5, #7?  You realize this is about Amazon's affiliate program, right?  Amazon isn't going to stop selling in these states, they're just not going to offer their affiliate program there.<br />
<br />
#1, #5?  You realize this isn't special to Amazon, but is rooted in the overused interstate commerce clause of the constitution, whereby no state can levy a tax on goods imported from another state (hence the silly "use tax" stuff).  It's true for online, phone orders, and mail order.<br />
<br />
Me, I don't see why Amazon (or other out-of-state resellers) should pay taxes to a state for the privilege of shipping goods to that state. But to the extent that's going to happen, calling affiliate program participants "physical presence" for companies is going to have all sorts of unintended consequences.<br />
<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1506521">also</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:29:44 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773240]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773240]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[realjournalist]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@4: The first reason has already been detailed by other commenters: Amazon is based here. The second is that this story is about buying through Amazon's vendor network, not directly from Amazon.<br>
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by realjournalist]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:42:51 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773215]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773215]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Dougsf]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["their"
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503341">Dougsf</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:32:40 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773211]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773211]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Dougsf]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Pretty much every major online retailer charges CA residents sales tax. Probably for reasons #6 noted. <br />
<br />
A little off topic, but I think they're vendor network has gotten to big without much quality controls IMO. Odering from Amazon is almost as much as a crapshoot as eBay, Bookfinder, or Gemm these days.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503341">Dougsf</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:32:09 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773210]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1773210]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Lily Fluffbottom]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Fuck Amazon.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501404">Lily Fluffbottom</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:32:09 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772990]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772990]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Let me see ... Hawaii, Cali ... at this rate they'll put themselves out of business.<br />
<br />
The states would be well advised to arrest and hold any employees of this tax-avoiding firm when they travel in their states and only release them upon full payment of taxes owed.<br />
<br />
I recommend the use of cattle prods in the capture.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503038">Will in Seattle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:57:10 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772981]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772981]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Foggen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@4 They have to collect taxes in any state where they have a physical presence, be it an office or a distribution center.  Anywhere else it's interstate commerce which may not be taxed by states according to the Constitution.  That's also why <a href="http://bestbuy.com/">BestBuy.com</a> and other online retailers that are tied to B&M stores have to collect taxes.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1585642">Foggen</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:53:30 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772974]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772974]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Foggen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Don't be ridiculous.  One of Amazon's core business advantages is that it doesn't have to pay sales tax in most of the country.  That, combined with a model that allows them to eat shipping charges in a lot of cases makes them an almost unbeatable value proposition for buyers.  Amazon will hold onto that status tooth and nail.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1585642">Foggen</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:50:32 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772970]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772970]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[keshmeshi]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[What?  Then why the hell does Amazon charge me sales tax every time I buy something from them?  I guess it's hard for them to boycott their home state, but if they're willing to collect those taxes here, why not everywhere?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1502454">keshmeshi</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:48:44 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772953]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772953]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fifty-Two-Eighty]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[They pulled the plug on Rhode Island yesterday also - for the same reason.<br />
<br />
And Fnarf, this isn't going to increase sales tax revenues in the affected states. All it's going to do is shift business (and jobs) to states that don't have these laws.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1500716">Fifty-Two-Eighty</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:44:59 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772948]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772948]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Max J]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It depends on which states, doesn't it, dummy?<br />
<br />
All the wyomings and alaskas and whatever won't add up to a single california.<br />
<br />
God you a just fucking stupid on legs, are you?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499505">Max J</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:43:17 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Amazon's Tea Party]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772933]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/30/amazons-tea-party/#1772933]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fnarf]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm with the states on this one. It's outrageous that you can avoid sales tax just by going online. You know you're supposed to pay an equivalent "use tax" every time you buy something with no tax, but no one ever does. Hurts the state, hurts local businesses.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1498793">Fnarf</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:39:21 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




