<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>










































































































































































































 
	 	 











































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Department of Unnecessary Remakes
    
      by Paul Constant</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=1769278&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Department of Unnecessary Remakes
    
      by Paul Constant</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1784681]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1784681]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[paulus]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["this one was a decently conceived spook show"<br />
<br />
It was SO much more than that.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1505109">paulus</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:40:44 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1775480]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1775480]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Badger]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Hollywood isn't interested in originality anymore - the economy has them running scared, and they see anything that hasn't already generated some money as a risk. Thats why we're getting so many sequels and remakes. If you don't like it - don't go see it. By giving them your money you're just encouraging them.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1648168">Badger</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:35:14 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771844]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771844]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Will in Seattle]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Even if it's as good as the best American remake, it will still suck.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503038">Will in Seattle</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:27 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771627]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771627]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[The Amazing Jim]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Can the Swedes remake Transformers (and the sequel) into decent movies? I'll even read poorly translated subtitles if they do.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503863">The Amazing Jim</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:02:36 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771308]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771308]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[UNPAID COMMENTER]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm just afraid the director will age-up the two main characters (after all, that brings in more of the Twilight tween set) lower the violence to PG-13 (same reasoning) and remove all trace of the Eli transexual subplot.  (which the original only hinted at, but still included none the less).
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1507363">UNPAID COMMENTER</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:25 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771016]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1771016]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[William T. Fuckweiler]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Summary of comments:<br />
<br />
 Statement made just to evoke controversy: "The movie sucked" "All movies are purely commercial"  Hey, why did you comment here if it's a subject you don't care about?<br />
<br />
 Ad hominem attacks, assholery: "Elitist! Elitist! Idiot!"<br />
<br />
And if I wasn't quoting or paraphrasing you, thanks for being cool.  But your civilized discourse didn't register because I was distracted by dumbfucks, as usual.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1619481">William T. Fuckweiler</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:14:23 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770417]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770417]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[fendel]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'll explain it to you Paul, if you can't figure it out. Poor thing.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1505997">fendel</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:14:24 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770266]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770266]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[datajunkie]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I think there's only 3 places where the DVD subtitles are really bad, I agree with #20 Patti that the DVD isn't unwatchable but I would wait for the rerelease with the fixed subtitles if you are buying it. I'm assuming most rental places aren't going to buy new copies for the rerelease, so it might be pointless to wait in that case.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501986">datajunkie</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:50:08 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770259]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770259]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[VAOAWG]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@11: since you thought the greatest thing about the film was the production design and loathed the CGI (cats), I'm sure you'll be quite happy with the US version!  Have fun with your highly developed visual prowess!<br>
<br>
p.s. it wasn't a horror film.<br>
<br>
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1770258">VAOAWG</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:40:26 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770080]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1770080]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Patti]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I saw it in the theatre and also watched the DVD and the subtitles don't make it unwatchable.<br />
<br />
And this particular remake idea is terrible because the original is totally accessible, and because Cloverfield is one of the worst movies ever.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501300">Patti</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:37:01 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769915]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769915]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rotten666]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I haven't seen this because of the above mentioned mangled subtitles.  Should I wait for a new edition to arrive or just see it as is?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1500832">Rotten666</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:41:21 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769910]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769910]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[TheMisanthrope]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Not having seen the movie, I cannot comment.  However, Remember when Insomnia was remade.  But, Insomnia needed to be redone, though not as a shot for shot remake (that was still slow as fuck).  <br />
<br />
However, I will challenge you in saying that you should generally read the book first.  There are a lot of movies that improve on the books which they were based on.  But, these are little known books that weren't very good to begin with (or, Stephen King novels).
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499235">TheMisanthrope</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:38:51 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769882]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769882]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Barack No Pest Strip]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This weekend I watched "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" for the first time.<br />
<br />
This has to be one of the best children's movies ever made...fascinating and highly recommended for all ages!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/080324/Villains/Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang_l.jpg">http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/&hellip;</a><br>
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1504513">Supreme Ruler Of The Universe</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:27:28 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769701]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769701]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[awfranks]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[They are also remaking the awesome 2005 French film 13 Tzameti simply titled 13. The cast is ridiculous including Jason Statham and 50 Cent. I don't know if I should blame Hollywood or the director who is the same as the original. Either way it's so unnecessary.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1536320">awfranks</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:40:59 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769693]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769693]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[josh]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I really liked the original, but I'm not entirely sure why a remake set in Reagan-era Colorado is especially offensive. The point about the original being in Swedish holds some water given how horribly the DVD subtitles were translated.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499353">josh</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:34:57 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769679]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769679]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[duckgirlie]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I loved this film, the ending was heartbreaking.<br />
<br />
At least a remake might encourage people who missed the original first time around to check it out. I know the arthouse cinema over here tries to show original foreign films that have been remade a little before their release, to try and capitalise on the studio's promotion.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499911">duckgirlie</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:22:30 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769574]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769574]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Julie in Eugene]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@11.  I agree with you on the cats.  But, that's it.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499516">Julie in Eugene</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:02:48 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769564]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769564]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[datajunkie]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I don't think this is a re-make of the movie but another adaptation of the book. From what I've read the director is exploring other aspects of the book that did not make it in the other movie. I understand the reaction though. I'm dreading and a little excited at the new movie being made, but knowing hollywood they are probably going to fuck it up.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501986">datajunkie</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:54:08 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769549]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769549]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[levide]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@10 <br />
<br />
Nah, Paulus, this one was a decently conceived spook show with a couple of novel ideas floating in the periphery (the most resonant of which was the contrictively angular production design, which could actually translate well to '80s Colorado).  It also had embarassing, shitty CGI cats.  Neither of these things, alone or in tandem, suggest greatness.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1509774">levide</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:44:05 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769536]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769536]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[paulus]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[this one was art.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1505109">paulus</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:37:40 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769523]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769523]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Max Solomon]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[because movies are commerce and not art.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503317">Max Solomon</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:32:30 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769517]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769517]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Julie in Eugene]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm also in the "loved loved" camp for this movie, and I don't really get why a re-make is necessary.  I don't know, would you all think it was weird if someone was like, "hey, that movie Humpday was pretty good, I think we should make a big studio re-make"?  I think this re-make is weird in the same way that that would be.<br />
<br />
At some point, don't you have to have respect for the fact that the thing itself is an artistic creation (the acting, the direction, the cinematography), it's not just the story?  It does seem disrespectful to me -- like someone saying, hey, that was good, but I can do much better.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499516">Julie in Eugene</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:27:12 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769443]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769443]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[levide]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm not a fan of remakes in general, but I don't see what's so upsetting in this case.  Bringing popular genre fluff to the States is nothing new, and it's not like "Let the Right One In" is anything but that.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1509774">levide</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:14:53 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769389]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769389]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[n/a]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[You don't explain anywhere in your blog post why a remake of another film is inherently *dis*respectful, or why only "necessary" movies should be made.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by n/a]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:03:59 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Department of Unnecessary Remakes]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769371]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/29/department-of-unnecessary-remakes/#1769371]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Paul Constant]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@4: You're right! Clearly things that are not in English need to be corrected.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=728145">Paul Constant</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:55:17 -0700</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




