http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/09/pledging-for-911-truth Comments On: Pledging for 9/11 Truth by Paul Constant en-us Copyright 2009 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0800 Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:45:00 -0800 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by Larry Silverstein]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:22:11 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Larry Silverstein]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:20:34 -0700 The Stranger http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUTATYaIZ…
Posted by http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUTATYaIZYI]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:46:32 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Paul Constant]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:51:29 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Gomez]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:36:21 -0700 The Stranger nyccan.org and look at the questions that they are looking to have answered. It all seems reasonable to me. Chiefly they want Bush, Cheney, Tenet, et al to answer questions about what happened leading up to 9/11 and in its aftermath. This is not all conspiracy theory stuff, just a push for accountability.
Posted by kresblamania]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:53:03 -0700 The Stranger The truth is so overrated!
The truth is so yesterday!
Maxwell jump ~

Trolls galore doin' the 911 dance:

Shala la la la
A little piece of you
The little peace in me
Will die
For this is not America
Shala la la la
Posted by nader paul kucinich gravel]]> Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:05:04 -0700 The Stranger
36, what do you think happened?
Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:51:44 -0700 The Stranger Keen and Hamilton themselves have said they were setup to fail.

Building 1 and 2 fell @ 2/3 of free fall speed, continually accelerating faster and faster through the path of greatest resistance, 80,000 tons of it's structural steel. (Purdue omits floors 1-91 of wtc1 and floors 1-77 of wtc 2, it does not model the collapse, other issues with purdue http://stj911.org/ryan/PurdueLetter.html…)

Building 7 was first ignored for the official story but now relies on 400 structural steel connections failing per second in a fire-induced gravitational collapse.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQ…)

Thermite can be found in the BPAT Report from FEMA; the Report of the United States Geological Survey; and the report of RJ Lee Group (the company hired by the WTC insurance company to conduct an independent private study). Those findings should have led to investigation procedures determined by the National Fire Protection Association:

“NFPA very clearly states melted steel or concrete is a sign of exotic accelerants. Therefore, the debris should have been thoroughly analyzed for exotic accelerants, specifically Thermite.”
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/wp-co…

Has anyone actually looked at the evidence from the Moussaoui trial?
Our Governments evidence?
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecase…

This bandana from flight 93?
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecase…

The whole situation is F'd, we have two ways to go folks
One relies on government agencies, compartmentation, classification, closed doors and torture. The alternative is individual and group research, transparency and growing peer reviews. Both have facts and fringe elements and focusing on the fringe elements is disingenuous at best.
Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:24:15 -0700 The Stranger 1) they got hit by planes
2) uncontrolled fires with no functional suppressions systems
3) heat weakened (not melted) steel frame after some of the columns were cut by impact
4) warping structures failed, leading to global collapse of the section from the impact above, going out of control and taking the rest of the tower with.

Read the fucking Purdue University study before you start making things up, or giving nice little appeal to (mistaken) authority link. It covers exactly this topic.

Find out what the fuck I'm talking about.

nanothermite. holy FSM that's stupid.
Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:18:53 -0700 The Stranger You literally don;t know WTF you're talking about.
Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:14:20 -0700 The Stranger
You literally don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:12:56 -0700 The Stranger
You enable the fucktards by closing your eyes to the physical evidence.
Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:10:27 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:09:04 -0700 The Stranger I'm a socialist/pacifist. I opposed just about everything Bush did, I oppose most of Obama's policies for being too right wing, I want to reduce the military to an absolute minimum, and I want to nationalize all essential services including health care, basic housing, water and food delivery and the like.
Just because I'm a left winger, doesn't mean I'm going to attribute crimes to the innocent that I otherwise oppose. I care whether my beliefs are true. There's nothing to the 9-11 conspiracy bullshit, except for the conspiracy being amongst a bunch of fucktard religious fanatics who care no more for human life than the fucking fascist assholes we had/have in office.
Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:07:56 -0700 The Stranger
The 9/11 Smoking Gun:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/
content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/
00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

And for morons who can't read:

http://vodpod.com/watch/1516610-a-danish…


Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:45:35 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:28:57 -0700 The Stranger
Posted by giffy]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:23:20 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:17:37 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Neo Synic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:13:50 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Neocynic]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:06:20 -0700 The Stranger Include the commission report, the NTSB report, the Perdue University report and the various ones that I've forgotten of the top of my head.
Posted by Sean]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:37:50 -0700 The Stranger Posted by Kathy]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:44:43 -0700 The Stranger Wait, so people who want a new investigation into 9/11 are all of a sudden buying into EVERY wacky conspiracy theory you can dream up? I for one am yet to believe anything I've heard, regardless of the source. So which (yours or mine) is the most prudent approach?
I, as a 'twoofer' have nothing but suspicion about every theory I've been offered.
You're not so lucky to be debating idiots (no matter how hard you try to corner us), so drop the condescension and stop putting words in other people's mouths. All you're doing is throwing yourself 100% behind government sponsored conspiracy theories that have an equally small number of people 'letting the cat out of the bag.'
I don't believe that there was thermite in the buildings. I believe a plane hit the pentagon. I don't believe there were pods beneath the planes. I don't believe that flight 93 was routed to Cleveland before crashing in Pennsylvania. Hell, I don't even suspect any of those to be true. But what I do believe is that an adequate, open, and transparent public investigation needs to be conducted so there aren't nearly as many holes in the story. If there were less holes, there'd be less nonsense to deal with, and we'd both be happier wouldn't we?
Oh that's right, I'll state again, you simply don't give a fuck what happened, and you'd rather sit back and laugh at people who do. You'd rather pretend that we are a small group of whackos who think the government was in on it. Maybe they were. Maybe they weren't. Maybe they sat back and let it happen. Maybe they failed to investigate and committed criminal neglect. Fuck you for mocking people who want to know what happened.
If it weren't for 'twoofers' of another kind, the Bush Administration's torture program would never have been exposed. And idiocy like what you displayed above would have allowed it to simply fade away unnoticed.
There are nuts of every kind, and you and Paul Constant are merely the mirror image of the people you're mocking.
Posted by You you you you]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:35:08 -0700 The Stranger
Present your theory of the crime. What is the explanation that makes more sense?
Posted by giffy]]> Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:46:13 -0700 The Stranger