<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>















































































































































































































































 
	 	 





















































































































































































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk
    
      by Dan Savage</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Rss.xml?oid=16030688&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk
    
      by Dan Savage</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger.</copyright>
      <webMaster>webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:45:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16039987]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16039987]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Moggadeet]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I had a baby-talky boyfriend, and it was a big part of my side of (mutually) ending that relationship.  Sex is for grownups, kink is for grownups, if you want to have them with me you need to adult up.<br />
I agree that it's probably not actual ageplay, people who  slide into this as a habit greatly outnumber those with that kink.  In this guy's case his other gf, who doesn't like sex, had encouraged him.  I think it worked well for her, but I wish him luck getting laid regularly ever again.<br />
(Of course, what to do with my *other* bf, who wants me to brat so he can spank, is a whole other question.)
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=14236979">Moggadeet</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:15:03 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16037976]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16037976]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Sandiai]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@31. I see. I too dislike when adults talk down to children.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=3606329">Sandiai</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16036292]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16036292]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[lhbbcp]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@8, that's hilarious. I can't breathe.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=8319313">lhbbcp</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:32:42 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16035360]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16035360]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[EricaP]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[delta@7, good point, but not taken far enough. Seems to me a couple should spend about 50% of  the time having sex that both people find deeply satisfying, with 25% given to one person's special kinks and 25% to the other person's special kinks. (Roughly, obviously, and subject to negotiation if one person's kink involves more difficulty or hazards than the other person's kink.)<br />
<br />
If there isn't a subset of sexual practices that you both find deeply satisfying and can agree to call "our normal sex" (where neither person feels they're doing the other a favor), then I don't think you're sexually compatible in the long run.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1550045">EricaP</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:29:46 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16035330]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16035330]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[agony]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@22  Unless the letter writer is also unfamiliar with five year olds. <br />
------------<br />
I'd say that's the most likely.  <br />
<br />
And I'd say that those who don't like it aren't really reacting to the child-sex aspect (which may or may not be present), but just to the thing itself.  I don't like it when I see someone talking to her dog that way, either.  We've all known people who get kittenish in certain circumstances, because at some point in their lives they were given the impression it was cute.   It's an erroneous impression.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=4101783">agony</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16034533]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16034533]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Liam3851]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[WAA never makes clear whether "when we're getting close" means sex or cuddling. If sex, yeah, I think Dan's right about this being a tacit fetish that's being tested out. But for cuddling, well, my wife and I do this all the time (and it sounds like 1, 4, 6, etc.)-- we talk to each other like we're each other's favorite teddy bear. Probably because, well, under what other circumstances was cuddling up in bed at night appropriate, except as a young child with a stuffed animal, prior to having an intimate partner? Key is here that it's not a turn-on for us, and very well may not have been for WAA's partner either. <br />
<br />
That said I can imagine that for some people it wouldn't be fun and cozy, just weird, even in the situation I describe. If so, by all means, follow Dan's advice.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=15642555">Liam3851</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033714]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033714]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Machiavelli was framed]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@28 yes I am familiar with those studies, and they are not what I am referring to.  Exaggeration in the pronunciation of words for the purpose of teaching proper language skills I'm good with.  I'm even ok with repeating basic consonance and vowel sounds to an infant/toddler with the goal of teaching them language.<br />
<br />
It is speaking to them simplistically, nonsensically (Jabberwalky not included) and talking down to them I object to.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=6470901">Machiavelli was framed</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:44:29 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033705]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033705]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[cracked]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@29  As you said, there is a lot not mentioned in the letter.  I just don't think it is so clear that the boyfriend is aberrant by any measure as you cringers are suggesting.  Maybe they are both better off with other partners.  Or the other person can modify their mannerisms to make it work or whatever.  Is it that clear they SHOULD modify their mannerisms?<br />
<br />
 I'm not a baby talk guy my self and I might have "visceral disgust."  too.  Not sure.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1601807">cracked</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033700]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033700]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[shurenka]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@27<br />
"It is possible to have a literalist partner subtly browbeat all playfulness out of you, or jab by jab beat mannerisms out of you that make them feel threatened"<br />
<br />
Lol wut? Make them feel threatened? How? I fall on the side of the cringers: I don't want to feel like the parent of my partner, even in nonsexual situations. I want an adult, too, who's mature and competent and fully articulate. Baby talk especially (which, I'm interested everyone has latched onto, given it's not specifically mentioned in the letter) is one of those annoyances which I don't think I could compromise, it seems just to provoke visceral disgust (to me).<br />
<br />
I also think there's a big difference between acting immature or bratty or verbally stunted and being playful. I think most people who would wince at the former aren't curmudgeons who hate all fun.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=4736369">shurenka</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:14:45 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033691]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033691]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Sandiai]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Not much to do with the topic at hand, but... @26, Baby talk just may be the key to human evolution.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/dec/20/evolution.science" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/d&hellip;</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_talk" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_talk</a><br />
<br />
I don't know. WAA's boyfriend just sounds insecure.<br />
<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=3606329">Sandiai</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:56:36 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033689]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033689]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[cracked]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[DAN:  given the viciousness of some of the responses here, I think you should re-examine your own thoughts about this to see if you have a knee jerk bias that may be impacting your response.  I understand what you think you are seeing, but I'm not sure it is as clear from the information given as you think it is.<br />
<br />
It is possible to have a literalist partner subtly browbeat all playfulness out of you, or jab by jab beat mannerisms out of you that make them feel threatened, just as people in our society are often threatened by mannerisms they think are "gay", whether done by gays or straights.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1601807">cracked</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:47:16 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033686]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033686]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Machiavelli was framed]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Frankly it annoys me to hear adults talking to babies and children in "baby talk".  Talk to them like they are babies, children and you will raise the simpleminded.  At which point all you'll be able to do is have tea parties with them.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=6470901">Machiavelli was framed</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:36:38 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033225]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16033225]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[seandr]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This and so many other undesirable behaviors can be easily extinguished using an electric collar with remote control shock administration.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501255">seandr</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032771]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032771]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[undead ayn rand]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@7: It's not sexual, nor is it required for complete satisfaction. It's a tic/mannerism.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1910531">undead ayn rand</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032767]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032767]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[vennominon]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I suppose we can at least draw the moral that not bringing something up because it's pretty weird isn't a strategy likely to meet with great long-term success.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=5186970">vennominon</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032756]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032756]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[uncreative]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Why are people discussing babytalk when the letter writer never said a thing about it. The letter writer said he starts acting and speaking like a five year old, but the comments seem to be about either how toddlers speak or how people speak to toddlers (the two to three year old range, roughly). There is a huge difference between a five year old's speech and a toddler's. <br>
<br>
I'm actually kind of curious how the partner is acting like a five year old, but it's probably much more in a childlike enthusiasm and simplicity of language than the cutesy-wutesy or broken grammar that people seem to be discussing. Unless the letter writer is also unfamiliar with five year olds.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by uncreative]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:53:13 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032384]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032384]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mr. herriman]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Lol @14 :) no, I wasn't even born yet in the 60s but I see what you're saying. And it's really something I only catch myself doing once in a great while (see first post, where I said I know that I have done it before, not that this is something I "do") and not sexually. It stems from shyness, and as I am now acknowledging a third time, uh, yes, the offenders, regardless of frequency, already know it's annoying but occasionally need reminders, the same way that people who overuse the word "like" or smack their gum do. All I came here to do was to give the LWs boyfriend the benefit of the doubt that he has a child fetish or whatever. I think he's just shy about sex.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1501762">mr. herriman</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:26:25 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032382]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032382]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[eclexia]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Something about this letter and the comments reminded me of something.... And I found the something.<br />
<br />
"You are not a LOLcat", written to "I, Anonymous" by somebody who was apparently friends-of-friends with a public baby-talker. This pretty much sums of the rage it inspires in some people:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/07/26/you-are-not-a-lolcat" rel="nofollow">http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive&hellip;</a><br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1499527">eclexia</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:25:54 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032374]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032374]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Functional Atheist]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@16  Sometimes a letter genuinely touches a nerve, often because it reminds someone of an experience that they've had.<br />
<br />
The 'disgust' response is rather primal and visceral, so someone who is feeling/thinking "YUCK" is prone to over-reacting in a comment thread.  <br />
<br />
Sometimes a person's comment is just trolling, being provocative deliberately, to get attention.  <br />
<br />
And sometimes someone likes playing the role of devil's advocate, or likes to point out contradictions or hypocrisy or just another angle on a situation, and those sorts of responses to a Letter Writer might seem nastier than they were intended, especially to someone who prefers to empathize and sympathize.<br />
<br />
So, yeah--Letter Writers who are selected for SLLOTD should steel themselves for some harshness in the comment thread.  They would be wise to sift the comments, seeking out what's helpful (some of which might not be particularly 'nice') and disregarding that which seems mean-spirited or trollish.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=3908007">Functional Atheist</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:15:01 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032365]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032365]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[rob!]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[[Feel free to re-imagine as daddy/twink.]
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503138">rob!</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:00:47 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032361]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032361]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[rob!]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Caspar Q. Milquetoast checks out of a hotel. Then he realizes he has left his umbrella behind. He goes back to the hotel room to get it, but the room has been rented already. Through the door he hears a man's voice saying, <b>"Whose little sweetie are you?"</b><br />
<br />
A woman giggles and says, "Your little sweetie!"<br />
<br />
"Whose little hands are these?"<br />
<br />
"Tee-hee! Your little hands."<br />
<br />
"And whose little feet are these …and whose little ankles …and whose little knees?"<br />
<br />
Feeling himself beginning to blush furiously, Caspar calls through the door, "When you get to the umbrella, it's MINE!"
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1503138">rob!</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:58:21 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032352]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032352]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[bedelia]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It's distressing to me that people come here and share honest, sincere advice/anecdotes, bravely and generously offering up their personal stories, and then other commenters shit all over them. WHAT IS THE DEAL.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=1846901">bedelia</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:49:21 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032344]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032344]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[JJinAus]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Each to the own, but for me this would be horrible. I don't like children, but even if I did, I very much doubt  I would tolerate my partner speaking baby talk.  Ick ick ick. Imaging if it was dark! Double the ick. Unless your significant other likes it I would advise people to knock it the hell off.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=8172977">JJinAus</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032152]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16032152]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[agony]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@11 Sounds like you watched too many sitcoms in the sixties. This kind of thing used to be portrayed as "lovey dovey" and the way that people talked in intimate but not necessarily sexual situations.  Picture Thurston and Honey Howell.   And, yeah, it's unattractive and you need to knock it off.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=4101783">agony</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:26:30 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: SL Letter of the Day: Baby Talk]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16031951]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/02/17/sl-letter-of-the-day-baby-talk/#16031951]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[bareboards]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Straight woman here, with straight boyfriend who did the baby talk when he was feeling loving.<br />
<br />
His intention was not to flay the skin off my body and pour salt on the wounds, but that is what it felt like to me.<br />
<br />
We came up with a shortcut way to communicate when it happened that was non-shaming and loving. I would look at him with all the love he wanted to see and I would say "kumquat." Sweetly and nicely.<br />
<br />
And we would both laugh. It worked a charm.<br />
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Profile?oid=5035614">bareboards</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.thestranger.com">The Stranger</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



