http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/01/31/white-supremacy-and-the-republican-party-go-hand-in-hand Comments On: White Supremacy and the Republican Party Go Hand-in-Hand by Paul Constant en-us Copyright 2013 The Stranger. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, The Stranger readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact The Stranger. webmaster@thestranger.com (The Stranger Webmaster) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:30:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
But, hey, that worked out SO WELL for Democrats in the '70s! What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by ScrawnyKayaker]]> Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:58:38 -0800 The Stranger
Isn't this strictly a Republican problem?

Democrats don't have this problem and demographic changes in the US favor Democrats.

I'm not worried about racists being in control of the Republican party since it's unlikely they'll get the White House for a while. They'll either have to change or keep losing Presidential elections. That's their problem.
Posted by Patricia Kayden]]> Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:16:45 -0800 The Stranger
I have never heard of this tool-bag or his little organization, so if it actually exists and Mr. Constant isn't lying, it is a fringe group that does not represent the mainstream.

Seriously folks, how can you people read this shit and actually think that it is not bald faced Communist propaganda?

Again, SEN Robert Byrd (DEMOCRAT) was a member of the KKK. "This shit never falls out of the closet of liberals," does it Mr. Constant?

Thanks for the intellectual honesty there Mr. Constant...
Posted by GeneStoner]]> Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:50:26 -0800 The Stranger
The debates wouldn't be about super small modifications in gun laws or over a health care bill that would have made Nixon squeal with joy.

An extreme left might be able to push the debate towards single payer, universal handgun bans, living wages, and penalties on corporations as a function of their total worth as opposed to a set amount of money(you launder drug money, kiss 1/2 of your profits for all of those years goodbye).

Which then that, in turn, would push the debate more to the left so that the reforms we are gasping for now(background checks, Obamacare, etc.) would be really easy lifts as opposed to borderline inconceivable.

That's why, even as a moderate, you need an extreme left and an extreme right so that the whole damned debate field isn't drug into fascist corporatist Jesus land.
Posted by GhostDog]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:25:07 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Wandergeist]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:25:33 -0800 The Stranger Posted by socratesfanboy]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:48:21 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Original Andrew]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:47:56 -0800 The Stranger
And before you rush to judgement, answer me this. When was the last time a Democrat talked about taking over the means of production or anything that is directly socialist(as opposed to "if you squint and twist it around it may be socialist but not really")?

We need a large, organized radical left to balance the radical right.
Posted by GhostDog]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:44:05 -0800 The Stranger Foxnew.com dosent take comments anymore?
Posted by Jonathank5]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:32:24 -0800 The Stranger Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In]]> Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:15:24 -0800 The Stranger