<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Slog | The War Category Feed</title>
      <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/categories/the_war/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:26:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.34</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Who My Little Brother in the Army Is Voting For</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago, on a muggy Thursday in Jacksonville, Florida, I stood on a mansion-lined golf course watching my younger brother Mike put a ball on a tee and take a practice stroke, and thought distractedly to myself: <em>We're going to lose this state.</em> This was right after the Obama line crossed over the McCain line on <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/fl/08-fl-pres-ge-mvo.php">this Pollster poll-aggregate</a>, so things were tending in Obama's direction, generally speaking, but on the ground in Florida there was no hope afoot. The place is saturated in McCain lust. Of course, Jacksonville, <strong>a "city" of fast-food places and Hooters billboards and tire centers</strong>, never goes Democratic. Every road is a highway, there are almost no sidewalks, and the bits of sidewalks they do have are covered in scampering little lizards. At one point in the visit I went for a jog (which is difficult when the heat is punishing, the sidewalks are constantly giving out, and you're always about to step on a lizard), and was nearly hit by cars twice. It's not like they don't watch for pedestrians in Jacksonville; it's like they've never <em>heard</em> of pedestrians.</p>

<p><a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/10/MikeFrizzelle.jpg"><img style="float:left;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" alt="MikeFrizzelle.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/10/MikeFrizzelle-thumb.jpg" width="200" height="268" /></a>There on the golf course, Mike stepped to the tee, lifted the club, and--<i>poooock!</i>--knocked the ball straight/high/long down the fairway. Behind him, there was a white heron poking along the bank of a pond and, beyond that, staring straight at me, steely and proud, <strong>the white letters of a McCain/Palin sign in someone's backyard.</strong> Mike got his degree in business administration from a college in California last year and then, in a move that still amazes me, <strong>joined the Army.</strong> One of the advantages of joining the Army with a college degree is that you can start as an officer, but such was the state of Army recruiting a year ago among people with college degrees that the guys behind the desk in the recruiting office had to dig up a manual to figure out how to sign him up when he walked in the door. </p>

<p>Mike's a Republican, a semi-Libertarian, an action-movie fan, a born warrior, and easily the most virtuous of my three brothers--honest, humble, hardworking, funny, self-deprecating, easygoing. <strong>He doesn't make a theater of his opinions,</strong> the way the rest of us do. He's not a meat head. He voted for Kerry in 2004 because, as he explained to me at the time, "Bush is an idiot." A couple months ago, bored out of his mind at an Army base in Oklahoma, he bought and read Barack Obama's <em>Dreams from My Father</em> because I told him how good I thought it was, and then he did me better by reading John McCain's <em>Faith of My Fathers</em>, which he liked better. I tried to make a case about the importance of Obama having written his own book, but it crumbled in mid-air. For a military guy, McCain's war story is hard to set aside on a technicality. Most of the guys in the Army are voting for McCain. <strong>"Except for the black guys,"</strong> Mike says.</p>

<p>Ever since he read <em>Faith of My Fathers</em>, Mike's been leaning toward McCain, but since he's not big on pronouncements, his way of telling me that has been to say he hasn't made up his mind. And cuz I love the guy, and cuz I know he knows what I think, and cuz I don't want to spend the little time we ever get to talk hassling him, I haven't been bugging him about it. But seeing <strong>Sarah Palin's name</strong> in bright white there on the golf course, and later by the side of the road where our hotel was, and later in the front yard of a house next to the house where we went to a pre-wedding party for our older brother who was getting married--which is why we were all in Florida in the first place--I got up the nerve to ask Mike what he made of the possibility of <strong>Sarah Palin as commander in chief.</strong> This, I was pretty sure, would score me a couple points. But never one to fight, he grinned and said something neutral and changed the subject.</p>

<p>Our dad was in the Air Force. Our older brother, the one getting married, is in the Navy (he's the one I wrote about years ago <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=13755">in this piece</a>, parts of which are regrettably stupid [the lack of understanding of Iraq's history, the part where I hold forth on what Iraqis "want"]). Our grandpa was in the Marines during World War II--was a hand-to-hand combat instructor, lost a bunch of buddies in Japan--and then a conservative politician in California. I sat next to grandpa at the wedding rehearsal dinner and asked him the Sarah-Palin-as-commander-in-chief question. Even though he is a true right radical (thinks teachers get paid too much, thinks the plight of black people has been "overdramatized," he wrote a bill when he was in the California legislature that would allow Christian Scientist parents to let their children die of easily remedied medical conditions), I suspected that the idea of <strong>Sarah Palin giving orders to the Marines</strong> would freak his shit out. No such luck. He smiled and told me that he loved Sarah Palin because unlike most politicians, who don't tell you the truth, she says what she believes, no matter what it is. Like how she doesn't believe dinosaurs existed or whatever.<br />
 <br />
My dad, now a vice president at Northrop Grumman, the military contractor, lives in Virginia and is voting for McCain and there's nothing that will sway him. He laughs whenever I bring it up. His wife, my stepmom, is voting likewise, though they both are resigned to the probability that Virginia will go for Obama anyway. </p>

<p>As for Mike--well, when I sat down to write this post, I didn't exactly know where things stood. As far as I knew, his heart was still with McCain. He just finished <strong>field artillery (i.e., blowing shit up)</strong> school in Oklahoma and drove to Texas last week for his new assignment in El Paso. I sent him a text last night to ask him how Texas was treating him and whether he'd made up his mind about the election. He texted back to say: </p>

<blockquote>I already voted Obama. Texas seems okay I guess. Definitely better than Oklahoma.</blockquote>

<p>I texted:</p>

<blockquote>Are you getting shit from your pals in the army? Or do they not know who you voted for?</blockquote>

<p>He texted:</p>

<blockquote>They know. Both my roommates voted too. They both went McCain but I guess they were on the wall.</blockquote>

<p>I wanted to know what did it for him, what put him over the wall. He texted back:</p>

<blockquote>Republican party, <strong>palin,</strong> and the neverending "redistribution of wealth" (that's what the government does!) needed better argument. SHIT'S WEAK</blockquote>

<p>Mike Frizzelle, ladies and gentlemen. </p>]]></description>
				 <author>Christopher Frizzelle</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/who_my_little_brother_in_the_army_is_voting_for</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/who_my_little_brother_in_the_army_is_voting_for</guid>
         <category>2008</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Deadline</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7696021.stm">A gloomy story</a> in today's BBC about the men who died after Armistice was signed:</p>

<blockquote>...hundreds of these soldiers would lose their lives thrown into action by generals who knew that the Armistice had already been signed.
<br><Br>
The recklessness of General Wright, of the 89th American Division, is a case in point.
<br><Br>
Seeing his troops were exhausted and dirty, and hearing there were bathing facilities available in the nearby town of Stenay, he decided to take the town so his men could refresh themselves.
<br><Br>
"That lunatic decision cost something like 300 casualties, many of them battle deaths, for an inconceivable reason," says [historian] Mr Persico.</blockquote>

<blockquote>At 10.45 another 40-year-old soldier, Frenchman Augustin Trebuchon, was taking a message to troops by the River Meuse saying that <strong>soup would be served at 11.30 after the peace</strong>, when he too was killed.
<br><br>
Augustin Trebuchon's grave - along with all those French soldiers killed on 11 November 1918 - is marked 10/11/18. It is said that after the war France was so ashamed that men would die on the final day that they had all the graves <strong>backdated</strong>. </blockquote>]]></description>
				 <author>Brendan Kiley</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/the_deadline</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/the_deadline</guid>
         <category>History</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:52:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Letter of the Day</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>HEY STRANGER: Thanks for your article of 21 October on "<a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=703429">Ending the Occupation</a>." I just want to say that I am pissed off at military recruiters. They are quite possibly <strong>the most corrupted human beings on this planet</strong>, with the exception of Dino Rossi and John McBush. They lie to children (<strong>like they lied to me when I was 17</strong>), and how the city of Seattle can allow them free-roaming access to teen events on public property is beyond me. If the city allowed carnival workers to set up recruiting tables and harrass teens at their events, there would be a major shitstorm. (And carnival workers don't even make you do pushups). 

<p>Seattle needs to wake up and see military recruiters for what they are: <strong>vultures selling our children into servitude</strong>. Take this Iraq veteran's word for it: Once you let the army set up gimmicks and violent videogames in city parks, you are only a step away from getting calls in the middle of the night from your children while serving multiple tours in Iraq. Don't believe me? <strong>Ask my mom.</strong></p>

<p>Peace,<br />
Evan Knappenberger<br />
OIF 05-07 Veteran</blockquote></p>]]></description>
				 <author>Bethany Jean Clement</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/letter_of_the_day_66</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/letter_of_the_day_66</guid>
         <category>City</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:43:12 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;It&apos;s basically a criminal enterprise.&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you'd like to know what's going on in Afghanistan, <strong>all you need is 22 minutes</strong> and to click <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02222008/watch2.html">here</a>, to a Bill Moyers interview with Sarah Chayes from February.</p>

<p>If you want to know in more detail, read Chayes's book <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio/2-9780143112068-1"><em>The Punishment of Virtue</em></a>. It details her attempts, among other things, to get the local warlord in the southern center of Kandahar fired—instead he was promoted by Karzai. (If you're pressed for time with this book, you can skim some of the historical sections without missing much.) Given the news lately, this ought to be a popular Christmas gift.</p>

<p>Choice bits from the interview?:</p>

<p>The U.S.-backed Karzai government is "basically a criminal enterprise."</p>

<p>Pakistan, which receives $1 billion a year from the U.S., is a Taliban factory: "It's actually <strong>U.S. taxpayer money paying the insurgency</strong>."</p>

<p>That's only the beginning. Really. Just 22 minutes.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Jen Graves</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/its_basically_a_criminal_enterprise</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/its_basically_a_criminal_enterprise</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:15:09 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Drill, Bebé, Drill!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Who just found a bunch of oil under its soil?</p>

<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7675234.stm">Cuba</a>.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Brendan Kiley</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/drill_bebe_drill</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/drill_bebe_drill</guid>
         <category>2008</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:10:32 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>No, Really—Worry</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7636845.stm">Shots fired in US-Pakistan clash:</a></p>

<blockquote>The United States military says US and Afghan forces have exchanged gunfire with Pakistani troops across the border with Afghanistan.
<br><br>
A senior US military official says a five-minute skirmish broke out after Pakistani soldiers fired warning shots near two US helicopters. </blockquote>

<p>Financial crisis (the bailout), political crisis (suspended campaigns), more political crisis (McCain polling better than he should), nuclear crisis (North Korea giving us the finger), and now the Pakistani army has the cojones to fire at the U.S. military? Could you even imagine that happening eight years ago? No. You cannot.</p>

<p><a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/09/do_as_we_say_not_as_we_do">To repeat a post from yesterday</a>: we are losing leverage by the day.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Brendan Kiley</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/09/no_reallyworry</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/09/no_reallyworry</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Imperial Spider</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="art.spider.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/08/art.spider.jpg" width="292" height="219" /> And what is this <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/08/28/uk.dangerous.spider/index.html?eref=ib_topstories">all about</a>?<br />
<blockquote> <strong>The family of a British soldier serving in Afghanistan has been forced from their home after a poisonous spider hitched a ride back with him and apparently killed their pet dog.</strong></p>

<p>The camel spider's bite is not deadly to humans but can kill small animals.</p>

<p>Lorraine Griffiths and her three children, aged 18, 16, and 4, moved out of their house in Colchester, southeast England, and are refusing to return until the spider is apprehended, the UK Press Association reported.</p>

<p>Griffiths told the East Anglian Daily Times that the spider appeared after her husband, Rodney, returned from a four-month tour of duty in Helmand province, the arid southern Afghan frontline in the fight against Taliban extremists.</p>

<p>"My son Ricky was in my bedroom looking for his underwear, and he went into the drawer under my bed, and something crawled across his hand," she told the paper.</p>

<p>She said their pet dog <strong>Cassie confronted the creature, which they identified on the Internet as a camel spider, but ran out whimpering when it hissed at her.</strong></blockquote> Ring a bell? A 19th century bell? <em>The Moonstone </em>by Wilkie Collins? <em>The Sign of the Four</em> by Arthur Conan Doyle? Yes, you can see now that this story about the British soldier, the return, and the evil spider that is brought back to the home land is a classic example of colonial anxiety. The imperial adventures always have this worry, this fear, this sickening sense of exposure. The spider is nothing other than a sign of British guilt.   <br />
</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Charles Mudede</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/imperial_spider</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/imperial_spider</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:59:22 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>How to Win an Oil War</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The surge has worked like <a href="http://www.dontshake.org/index.php">shaken baby syndrome</a> works: Things have quieted down, but nobody in their right minds would consider the situation likely to end up well in the long term.</p>

<p>When I hear McCain, channeling Bush, prattling on about winning the war in Iraq, I have to wonder: What does he mean by win? A stable, free and democratic Iraq? <strong>Not going to happen</strong>. We all know it, I'd hope even McCain knows it. </p>

<p>When we leave, the oil-bearing parts of the country will become the effective property of Iran. In turn, Iran will be embroiled in an insurgency of its own. Eventually, when the country is hollowed out enough, it'll become at best a petty oil-dictatorship.</p>

<p>Can we be honest with ourselves, even if just for a moment? <strong>This war was about oil.</strong> In any candid sense, 'victory in Iraq' means we have access, perhaps exclusive access, to the vast oil resources contained within its borders. Everything else is gingerbread.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Jonathan Golob</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/how_to_win_an_oil_war</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/how_to_win_an_oil_war</guid>
         <category>2008</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:48:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Oh Georgia!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Wondering if World War III is about to start? </p>

<p>As usual, the <a href="http://exiledonline.com/cat/war-nerd/">War Nerd</a> can help:<br />
<blockquote>There are three basic facts to keep in mind about the smokin’ little war in Ossetia:</p>

<p>1. The Georgians started it.<br />
2. They lost.<br />
3. What a beautiful little war!</p>

<p>...</p>

<p>The American military’s response so far has been all talk, and pretty damn stupid talk at that. A Pentagon spokes-thingy called Russia’s response “disproportionate.” ...</p>

<p>If you want a translation, luckily I speak fluent Pentagon. So what “disproportionate” means is—well, imagine that you’re watching some little hanger-on who tags along with you get his ass whipped by a bully, and you say, “That’s inappropriate!” I mean, instead of actually helping him. That’s what “disproportionate” means from the Pentagon: “We’re not going to lift a finger to help you, but hey, we’re with you in spirit, little buddy!”</p>

<p>The quickest way to see who’s winning in any war is to see who asks first for a ceasefire. And this time it was the Georgians. Once it was clear the Russians were going to back the South Ossetians, the war was over. Even Georgians were saying, “To fight Russia by ourselves is insane.” Which means they thought Russia wouldn’t back its allies. Not a bad bet; Russia has a long, unpredictable history of screwing its allies—but not all the time. The Georgians should know better than anybody that once in a while, the Russians actually come through, because it was Russian troops who saved Georgia from a Persian invasion in 1805, at the battle of Zagam. Of course the Russians had let the Persians sack Tbilisi just ten years earlier without helping. That’s the thing: the bastards are unpredictable. You can’t even count on them to betray their friends (though it’s the safer bet, most of the time, sort of like 6:5 odds).</p>

<p><a href="http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-south-ossetia-the-war-of-my-dreams/">This time, the Russians came through</a>. For lots of reasons, starting with the fact that Bush is weak and they know it; that the US is all tied up in that crap Iraq war and can’t do shit; and most of all, <strong>because Kosovo just declared independence from Serbia, an old Russian ally. It’s tit for tat time, with Kosovo as the tit and South Ossetia as the tat. </strong>The way Putin sees it, if we can mess with his allies and let little ethnic enclaves like Kosovo declare independence, then the Russians can do the same with our allies, especially naïve idiotic allies like Georgia.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>One cannot think of Russia today as being the same as the Russia of the Soviet Union or Cold War. Russia is little more than an oil company--a belligerent, preening and despotic oil company with thousands of nuclear warheads. A company driven almost entirely by greed and insecurity.</p>

<p>The neo-Liberal economic reforms foisted upon the country (thought up by the same DLC assholes who came up with welfare reform and the financial industry deregulation that directly lead to our own financial collapse, for those of you keeping track) in the 1990s have left the Russian population constantly bristling at any sense that they are being denigrated. </p>

<p>Georgia's agitation to join NATO, and the growing sense that the US might also strongly encourage this, proved intolerable. Georgia is strategically located, near to some of the Russian oil deposits and pipelines. We didn't like those nuclear missiles in Cuba. Why would Russia tolerate NATO right next door?</p>

<p>As Dan noted, subsequently <a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/this_is_a_very_bad_idea_right">we're started sending some troops</a> and humanitarian aid. I wouldn't start digging your fallout shelters right now, but who knows. Just like during the blockade of Cuba--the biggest risk is of an "accident" occurring, in which American and Russian troops start shooting at one another without really intending to.</p>

<p>On that cheerful note, do you know the <a href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/338/18/1326-a">four primary nuclear warhead targets for the city of Seattle proper</a>? </p>

<p>The University of Washington main campus, Boeing Field, Seattle Center and Seatac Airport.</p>

<p>Estimated casualties? 341,000.  Neat.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eeOHEU7Ykyg&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eeOHEU7Ykyg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>Because Matthew Broderick knows all.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Jonathan Golob</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/oh_georgia</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/oh_georgia</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Pentagon Versus the British Media</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7501538.stm">BBC News</a> and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/11/afghanistan.usa"><em>The Guardian</em></a> confirm the <strong>U.S. air strike that killed 47 Afghan civilians</strong> that <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-07-07-voa51.cfm">the Pentagon continues to deny</a>.</p>

<p>From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/11/afghanistan.usa"><em>The Guardian</em></a>:</p>

<blockquote>A US air strike killed 47 civilians, including 39 women and children, as they were travelling to a wedding in Afghanistan, an official inquiry found today. The bride was among the dead.</blockquote>

<p>From the Pentagon, via <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-07-07-voa51.cfm">VOA News</a>:</p>

<blockquote>The Pentagon says no civilians were killed in an air strike Sunday in a remote area of eastern Afghanistan, which local officials say killed 27 people who were walking to a wedding. U.S. military officials in Kabul say they believe the air strike hit its intended target, a group of militants. Pentagon Spokesman Bryan Whitman confirmed that view. "I can only tell you I talked to Afghanistan this morning, and they are very clear with that particular strike that they believe they struck the intended target and that there were not innocent civilians involved in that particular strike," said Whitman.

<p>The reports of civilian casualties came from Afghan officials, who said they spoke to people in the remote area by telephone. The U.S. military says Taliban militants often pressure villagers into claiming civilian casualties after air strikes.</blockquote></p>

<p>Alrighty then.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>David Schmader</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_pentagon_versus_the_international_me</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/07/the_pentagon_versus_the_international_me</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:27:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What Consumes Jet Fuel</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Here's an arresting fact: The increase in jet fuel costs from a year ago that airlines are currently dealing with totals around $25 billion in additional costs for carriers, which is about <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2008/05/22/wall-street-journal-what-to-expect-from-rising-jet-fuel-prices/">five times more than the airline industry has ever earned in a single year</a> (1999 was a record year for the industry, with profits topping out at about $5 billion).</blockquote>

<p>What consumes jet fuel:<br />
<img alt="737.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/737.jpg" width="250" height="200" /></p>

<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/05/05/baghdad/"><img alt="800px-C-17_4.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/800px-C-17_4.jpg" width="500" height="306" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=20080520_12_A1_Tesudo937041"><img alt="F-16.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/F-16.jpg" width="300" height="175" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123050897"><img alt="A10.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/A10.jpg" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.krdo.com/Global/story.asp?S=8352090&nav=menu552_1"><img alt="M1-A1_Abrams_1.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/M1-A1_Abrams_1.jpg" width="500" height="326" /></a></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Jonathan Golob</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/what_consumes_jet_fuel</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/what_consumes_jet_fuel</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bush Goes for Tic-Tac-Toe? No, Just Options!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>[Israeli] Army Radio had quoted a top official in Jerusalem claiming that a senior member in the entourage of President Bush, who visited Israel last week, had said in a closed meeting here that <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1210668683139&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull">Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were of the opinion that military action against Iran was called for</a>.

<p>The official reportedly went on to say that, for the time being, "the hesitancy of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice" was preventing the administration from deciding to launch such an attack on the Islamic Republic.</blockquote></p>

<p>But don't worry! "The White House on Tuesday flatly denied an [Israeli] Army Radio report that claimed US President George W. Bush intends to attack Iran before the end of his term." </p>

<p>Bush just wants us all to know "All options are on the table."  Whew. <strong>I feel much better</strong>.  </p>]]></description>
				 <author>Jonathan Golob</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/bush_goes_for_tictactoe_no_just_options</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/bush_goes_for_tictactoe_no_just_options</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The VA Is Sick of Your Inconvenient Diseases</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Department of Defense <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2008/05/12/daily43.html">announced a $2.3 million award</a> to the University of Cincinnati to study brain trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder.</p>

<p>But, according to an email leaked to <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/31646">a citizens' advocacy group</a>, <strong>VA bosses are discouraging social workers and psychiatrists from diagnosing PTSD</strong> in veterans because it's <em>inconvenient</em>:</p>

<p><img alt="VA_email_small.JPG" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/VA_email_small.JPG" width="500" height="517" /></p>

<p><br />
In the words of Melanie Sloan, the righteously outraged director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, "<strong>the VA is calling on its employees to deliberately misdiagnose returning veterans in an effort to cut costs</strong>."</p>

<p>Which isn't just outrageous—it's outrageously dumb.</p>

<p>Ignoring PTSD now will only cost the VA, with interest, in the next few decades. As <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB121063207588086509-JCODxaBcdADwD4dtqaLv8KcIMtQ_20080611.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top">this WSJ story</a> reports, PTSD is both underreported and lasting:</p>

<blockquote>Many military personnel are <strong>reluctant to seek counseling</strong> for PTSD because they are afraid that seeking help would harm their careers. A recent survey by the American Psychiatric Association found that 75% of military personnel felt that asking for assistance would reduce their chances for promotion.</blockquote>

<p>Undoubtedly, some people fake PTSD—but the incentives lean towards underreporting, not overreporting.</p>

<blockquote>Military officers and psychologists fear that veterans of the two wars will suffer <strong>mental-health problems for decades to come</strong>, a largely hidden cost of the current conflicts.
<br><br>
"<strong>There's a financial cost to this, but more importantly there'll be a cost in lives</strong> if we don't get a handle on this problem now," Sen. Christopher Bond (R., Mo.) said in a recent interview.</blockquote>

<p>Money for research is good. Money for treatment is imperative.</p>]]></description>
				 <author>Brendan Kiley</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/im_sick_of_your_inconvenient_diseases</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/im_sick_of_your_inconvenient_diseases</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:35:53 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>China Today</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Pulled from the <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/">Drudge Report</a>:<br />
<img alt="Picture%2017.jpg" src="http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/05/Picture%2017.jpg" width="400" height="487" /><br />
A secret submarine base, a massive airport, the longest bridge? Robert Mugabe is right about one thing: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/majornews/1917167/Chinese-build-secret-nuclear-submarine-base.html">learn Chinese</a>. </p>]]></description>
				 <author>Charles Mudede</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/china_today_2</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/05/china_today_2</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:57:19 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The US Army: Now with more sex offenders, child abusers, and crazy people.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some bad news, via the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/21/usa1">Guardian</a>.</p>

<blockquote>The US army doubled its use of "moral waivers" for enlisted soldiers last year to cope with the stress of the Iraq war, <strong>allowing convicted sex offenders, people convicted of making terrorist threats and child abusers into the military</strong>, according to new records released today.</blockquote>]]></description>
				 <author>Brendan Kiley</author>
         <link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/the_us_army_now_with_more_sex_offenders</link>
         <guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/04/the_us_army_now_with_more_sex_offenders</guid>
         <category>The War</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:45:13 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>