Friday, March 1, 2013

The Problem with Bob Woodward

Posted by on Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:31 PM

John Cassidy at The New Yorker puts it best:

The real rap on Woodward isn’t that he makes things up. It’s that he takes what powerful people tell him at face value; that his accounts are shaped by who coöperates with him and who doesn’t; and that they lack context, critical awareness, and, ultimately, historic meaning. In a 1996 essay for the New York Review of Books, Joan Didion wrote that “measurable cerebral activity is virtually absent” from Woodward’s post-Watergate books, which are notable mainly for “a scrupulous passivity, an agreement to cover the story not as it is occurring but as it is presented, which is to say as it is manufactured.”

It's no secret that I'll read just about anything with an American president on the cover. But Woodward's presidential books in the years since he toppled Nixon have been absolutely inessential. He's the ultimate access reporter, and right now he's throwing a fit because he didn't get the access (and phony respect) that he feels he deserves.

 

Comments (21) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I was thinking the problem with Bob Woodward is dementia. He's reminding me of last days Robert Novak.
Posted by GermanSausage on March 1, 2013 at 1:34 PM
Fnarf 2
@1, that might be true, but it doesn't explain the last thirty years. Woodward has been a tool for a long, long time. If that was dementia, he'd be long dead by now.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 3

Here's the real story. This is the first and only time in the last 4 years, that an Insider has come out with statements against the administration! That never, ever happens. I'm not talking about "right wing bloggers" or guys making comments. I'm talking about a dyed-in-the-wool, honest to God, Hollywood/East Coast Liberal Establishmentarian saying some thing bad about Obama. SNL doesn't make jokes about him. No major city newspaper in a blue state disparages him. This is the first. And there's a first time for everything!
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on March 1, 2013 at 1:46 PM
4
And yet, woodward was YOUR boy, until he dared to jump the shark by implying that Obama was just as big a cock face as dubya.
Posted by Sorry state of democrats... on March 1, 2013 at 1:47 PM
Max Solomon 5
what's up with the umlaut in 'cooperate'?
Posted by Max Solomon on March 1, 2013 at 1:51 PM
6
This rings true, but Cassidy is a complete ass so I will take it with a grain of salt.

Paul, have you read all of Caro's books on LBJ? Caro is pretty much the opposite of Woodward, as far as I can tell.
Posted by minderbender on March 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM
7
@5, that is one of the most distinctive parts of the New Yorker style. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/cu…
Posted by minderbender on March 1, 2013 at 1:54 PM
care bear 8
Is Woodward Robert Redford or Dustin Hoffman? This affects my opinion. I have a huge crush on Robert Redford.
Posted by care bear on March 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM
9
@4 I like how in your world view, you think that there are supposed to be democratic reporters for democrats, and republican reporters for republicans.

Gee, I wonder what gave you that idea.
Posted by GermanSausage on March 1, 2013 at 2:09 PM
fletc3her 10
What I found most amusing about his accusation that he had been threatened was the idea that anyone in the administration could feel threatened by something he wrote. I don't think anybody but Woodward believes he is framing the national debate. In order to be relevant at all he has to start slinging mud. The media will always cover that.
Posted by fletc3her on March 1, 2013 at 2:13 PM
raindrop 11
Another way to frame it is that Woodward does not parallel the preferred narrative.
Posted by raindrop on March 1, 2013 at 2:24 PM
heywhatsit!? 12
@8 Redford = Woodward. Sorry...
Posted by heywhatsit!? on March 1, 2013 at 2:33 PM
Ziggity 13
@11: you must sympathize somewhat, since the facts haven't supported your preferred narrative for some time now.

P.S. welcome back!
Posted by Ziggity on March 1, 2013 at 3:19 PM
Max Solomon 14
@7: holy shit i learned something! the diaeresis! thanks.
Posted by Max Solomon on March 1, 2013 at 3:21 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 15
#9

It's not so symmetrical.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on March 1, 2013 at 4:49 PM
Frank Blethen's vodka distiller 16
Poor Bob. Trying to stay relevant.
Posted by Frank Blethen's vodka distiller on March 1, 2013 at 5:07 PM
Reverse Polarity 17
Woodward was somewhat of a hero when I was younger. The reporter that sunk Nixon (a simplification, but whatever). Unfortunately, he hasn't really done anything useful in decades. He shot his load with Watergate, and hasn't been relevant since. Now he just begins to look increasingly pathetic. Sad.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on March 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM
18
Carl Bernstein, apparently rather forgotten.

Bob Woodward, apparently a fame whore.

but perhaps not. IDC

This is much ado about nothing.
Posted by Machiavelli was framed on March 1, 2013 at 7:53 PM
19
Is there anybody you won't throw under the bus? Oh wait, you have to treat even the most loyal of lackeys this way or the rush for the exits would be murderous. The fear of getting this treatment is keeping everybody else in line and parroting the Obama program.

Obama is a corrupt little wuss. His domestic policy is about lining the pockets of his cronies. His foreign policy is nonexistent, I mean really, Hilliary and Kerry, bitch please.
Posted by delbert on March 2, 2013 at 7:14 AM
20
@19 *passes over a tissue* dilbert dear your drooling over nothing. Here have some tea you'll feel better.
Posted by Machiavelli was framed on March 2, 2013 at 9:09 PM
MacCrocodile 21
Bob Woodward was also terrible on Celebrity Jeopardy.
Posted by MacCrocodile http://maccrocodile.com/ on March 3, 2013 at 1:34 PM

Add a comment