Friday, November 9, 2012

Seattle City Council Reverses Course on South Seattle Program Funding

Posted by on Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:43 PM

Members of the Seattle City Council have apparently changed their minds about defunding a south Seattle pre-arrest diversion program, after initially voting this morning to cut all funding for the program in the city's 2013-2014 budget.

As I reported earlier, this morning a dozen people involved with south Seattle's Communities United Rainier Beach program—a pre-arrest diversion program intended to keep young people out of the criminal system—showed up in a last-minute attempt to save their program's funding, which they'd only been informed was being eliminated days earlier. But their community effort was seemingly wasted; the council voted 8-0 to eliminate the funding anyway (with council member Mike O'Brien abstaining).

“At today’s meeting of the City Council’s Budget Committee, I heard poignant personal testimony expressing concerns about a proposed funding cut to the CURB program,” said Tim Burgess, chair of the budget committee, in a statement. “This budget action arose late in the Council’s budget process, which meant that the public had little time to provide feedback to council members... I will ask my colleagues to postpone action on the CURB program so that the City’s Human Services Department can report in the first quarter of next year on CURB’s performance to the Council’s Committee on Housing, Human Services, Health and Culture.”

Great speech, but Burgess didn't stand up for CURB during this morning's meeting.

O'Brien was the only council member who expressed hesitation over cutting the program (and even he didn't vote "no" to the cuts—he abstained from voting). After the meeting ended, I asked council member Nick Licata, who helped start the program in 2005, why the council had moved to defund it. "There's just no support to keep funding it," Licata said. The reasoning was, it was hard to quantify the program's success when it was focused on pre-diversion—keeping kids off the streets and from committing crime.

In any case, hurrah for CURB for making noise. They've managed to save their program for the time being, at least.

In other news, the Seattle City Council also unanimously voted this morning to increase funding for police officers and shelter services, and, as expected, delayed planning for a Eastlake transportation link connecting downtown to the University District, among 81 other amendments to Mayor Mike McGinn's 2013-2014 budget today.

The council won't formally adopt their preferred balanced budget until November 19, but today's meeting represented all the work before the fireworks.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
5
Im a member of this program and one of the ones that spoke at the hearing...This program is saving peoples lives such as myself, if eliminated many of us would be in a frenzy to find housing, and resources while trying to maintain our full time college schedules. Thanks for the report stranger!
Posted by SarciaF on November 10, 2012 at 11:25 PM
Free Lunch 4
@2 - Good idea. At $3K per youth, it sure is cheaper then imprisoning them. Hell, $3K doesn't even pay for the trial.
Posted by Free Lunch on November 9, 2012 at 6:02 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 3
Pre-arrest sounds like they gather up all the thugs and put them in cells before the inevitable felony is committed.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on November 9, 2012 at 5:01 PM
2
if money and grants results in pre arrest diversion, i.e., reduction in crime with attendant reduction in lives wasted behind bars, reduction in victims, increase in productive lives, etc., why don't we spend enough money to get rid of, excuse me, to pre arrest divert, ALL the crime?
Posted by fund what works on November 9, 2012 at 4:15 PM
Will in Seattle 1
So that's where the Boston Harbor fireworks went ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 9, 2012 at 3:48 PM

Add a comment