Monday, May 14, 2012

KING 5 Describes Assaults on Media at May Day Protests

Posted by on Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:44 AM

Brendan pointed toward this on Friday. People have been talking about it in the comment threads for about two weeks. Now, I think, I have an answer from the local TV stations themselves about what happened (and didn't happen) to TV cameramen in downtown Seattle while they were covering the May Day protests.

I asked all of the stations in town whether any of their staff had been assaulted that day, and the only one to answer in the affirmative was KING 5.

"Yes," said the station's executive news director, Mark Ginther. "One photographer was struck on the side of his head." Ginther described the cameraman's injuries as "minor," and added that in a separate incident, "a reporter had to protect another photographer from a group."

I talked to that reporter. He's Gary Chittim, 53, and he's been at KING 5 for 12 years. He's currently an environmental reporter, but he covered the WTO protests in 1999 and was there on May Day—along with his cameraman, Keith Bubach—to help with the station's coverage. Elsewhere in the crowd was Richard DePartee, the KING 5 cameraman who was struck in the side of the head.

"We were just outside of Niketown," Chittim told me. "Everything was peaceful… They were painting a heart in the street... And then we saw a paint ball hit the upper window at Niketown, and then we swung the camera over there in time to see the big panes of glass come down. So we rushed over to a row of cars right in front of Niketown, and kind of used that for cover to lean the cameras on so we could get a steady shot. That was where the action was—the black clad protesters were in front of us, attempting to smash more windows out. They were running back and forth on each side of us, and after a few seconds, a hand came over my shoulder and reached [toward the photographer, Keith Bubach], underneath the camera from behind, where the battery is located, and tried to flip the camera up, off his shoulder, to get it to fall forward."

Chittim continued: "I turned to face them, and they made threatening gestures with their sticks. There was a whole row of them coming. While I put my hands out to block them, another hand reached in and did the exact same maneuver on the camera.”

The photographer, Chittim said, "was able to keep his balance, but it was tweaking his wrist. That happened at least four times. They shoved sticks at me. I put myself in a spread eagle position between them and the camera, and they thrust sticks at me. They were holding their banners and signs, but not really trying to hurt me. Trying to scare me. And they were not really trying to hurt the photographer. If they wanted to, he’s very vulnerable…. It was like a polished assault on the camera but not really directly on us.”

How does Chittim feel about the confrontation?

“I think they were trying to destroy the camera or stop us from filming or videotaping, but I don’t think they were trying to physically hurt us," Chittim said. "If they were, they were really bad at it... I mean, it was where I wanted to be. I wasn’t totally freaked out and scared. But it was frightening. At the time it was intimidating because I didn’t know how far they were going to go. I’ve been in a lot stickier situations, but it was up there.”

He was however, impressed with their efficiency.

“I was just surprised at how the whole minute—it lasted about a minute—how quickly they got it done and moved away," Chittim said. "And when I was pushing one guy away, I could feel he had body armor on—and how quickly they blended back into the crowd."

The attack on KING 5 cameraman Richard DePartee was different.

“He sort of accidentally wandered into the very beginning of the assault where they were kind of preparing last-minute instructions on what they were going to do, right before they got to Niketown," Chittim told me. "Somebody pointed him out, said ‘Camera-man!’ And they turned and got in a circle around him and sort of shoved him around a little bit. And they shoved the camera off of his shoulder, and he was cradling it at that point like a baby. And you can hear on the audio, he’s still asking to interview them. And it’s at that point that they used the end of a stick, and struck him straight on with it—poked him on the side of his face near his ear.”

Chittim said DePartee was bleeding, and ultimately had to get stiches, "but he kept working. He knew that if they really wanted to mess him up they could.”

As for the effectiveness of turning on the media, Chittim said: “I think it’s a bad idea. If they’re trying to send a message of fear, then what they’re doing was very capable of doing that just by letting us show [their window smashing]. And for them to turn on us was completely unexpected. I’m used to them usually wanting us there, and working around us.”

Another wrinkle in all of this is the SPD's demand for local media outlets to now turn over video of the May Day protests for use in prosecutions. I told Chittim that I wonder whether turning over raw, un-aired video to the police without a fight turns the media into an arm of the law in a way that could lead to more attacks on media by people seeking a confrontation with the law.

I think that’s why we have the policy of not giving our raw materials to the police," Chittim said. "They have the best of our video already, what was on the air. And I don’t think that jeopardizes us. I think that’s why we don’t give them the raw.”

As for the SPD subpoenas demanding raw video, Chittim said: “I understand why they’re doing it. I hope it doesn’t make it harder for us.”

 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
Thanks for the update.
Posted by gloomy gus on May 14, 2012 at 12:02 PM
WFM 2
How to deal with a sticky anarchist situation: http://vimeo.com/11286656
Posted by WFM on May 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM
3
These black shirts are, at least, counter-revolutionaries. I think they're really goons who were hired specifically to make trouble.
Posted by Jack on Capitol Hill on May 14, 2012 at 12:11 PM
Kinison 4
@3"I think they're really goons who were hired specifically to make trouble."

Agent provocateur or hired goons, an excuse thats been used so often that its lose all meaning.

If I were a billionaire, why would I pay anyone to make Occupy Wall Street look bad when they pull stunts like this for free. Maybe if they came close to affecting the bottom line would I spend money, but hired goons that get arrested, squeal the minute they're arrested.
Posted by Kinison http://www.holgatehawks.com on May 14, 2012 at 12:24 PM
south downtown 5
$250M per year to pay for SPD - our highest discretionary budget item at 28% of the budget. are we getting our money's worth?
Posted by south downtown on May 14, 2012 at 12:24 PM
yelahneb 6
“I was just surprised at how the whole minute—it lasted about a minute—how quickly they got it done and moved away," Chittim said. "And when I was pushing one guy away, I could feel he had body armor on—and how quickly they blended back into the crowd."

Body armor? This doesn't smell right. Someone assure me I'm being paranoid here...
Posted by yelahneb http://www.strangebutharmless.com on May 14, 2012 at 12:25 PM
7
A group of thugs wearing the same uniform and armed with the same weapons, wearing body armor, well trained on how to cause maximum damange in a minimum amount of time, and able to quickly disable a commercial grade video camera.

Yeah, these sound like amateurs to me.
Posted by TechBear on May 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM
8
Sure some reporters were roughed up but that is not the moral equivalent of mass murder so it doesn't make sense to call this violence. Its just vandalizing some reporters.
Posted by giffy on May 14, 2012 at 12:32 PM
Will in Seattle 9
What's a few Unconstitutional Repressions of Freedom of the Press and all our Constitutional Liberties while not actually stopping lawbreakers during a riot between friends?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM
coolio 10
Why is it so hard to believe that black bloc members could make or get body armor, and train/plan demonstration tactics?
They have ben spray painting and putting up flyers for this for at least a month. Of course they are coming to it with a plan.

The only thing is, if they want to limit free press, then in my opinion they they are actually much worse that the cops they want to fight and the system they want to change.
Really your all just a bunch of pansy ass thugs, hiding behind a juvenile ideology.
Posted by coolio on May 14, 2012 at 12:39 PM
DOUG. 11
How come none of these guys were arrested? How were they able to disappear so quickly? Why would they threaten media members? If you're not at least a little dubious of SPD's story, then you're not thinking very hard.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on May 14, 2012 at 1:47 PM
SPG 12
@11, Weren't a few of them arrested? I seem to recall a couple got nabbed.
Posted by SPG on May 14, 2012 at 1:58 PM
13
@11 Because they blended into a protest march. It's not terribly hard to do such a thing. Its the same strategy many criminals use to avoid getting caught from muggers to purse snatchers. I guess SPD could have rounded up everyone there, searched bags, and figured out who was responsible, but then they would be getting shit, and more rightly so, for violating the rights of innocent people.

They'd threaten media members for the same reason they scared the shit out of people shopping or working, because they are self righteous assholes. Might as well ask why Shell kills Nigerians. Same mindset.

It would make even less sense for the mythical agent provocateur to attempt to prevent the media from covering it as well, isn't the supposed aim of such tactics to make the protesters look bad and it seems that requires some media coverage.
Posted by giffy on May 14, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Will in Seattle 14
@11 for the Follow The Broken Glass win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 14, 2012 at 2:22 PM
15
KING 5, I remember them from the '90s, back when they were running that fraudster G. Gordon Liddy's show.

KING 5's completely dishonest adverts claimed --- FALSELY --- that Liddy was a former Special Forces vet from Vietnam, what a complete farce. (Liddy never served overseas, he served only mainland USA as a military police officer back around the late '50s, if I recall the time correctly.)

Oh yeah....I would certainly believe any and all fairy tales from those fartheads....
Posted by sgt_doom on May 14, 2012 at 2:53 PM
16
And in further news about the crack SPD:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/lo…
Posted by sgt_doom on May 14, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Sir Vic 17
@11 "How come none of these guys were arrested?"

Black clothing, not black skin. We are talking about the SPD, remember?

As far as being hired goons, the organizational skills required are similar to those required for a guild quest in a MMOG. That is to say, quite common.
Posted by Sir Vic on May 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM
18
Dear Anarchists: Go live in the woods.

No love, Society
Posted by suddenlyorcas on May 14, 2012 at 3:40 PM
19
Still, you gotta admit, they've managed to keep a consistent message since the WTO riots. And that message is, "we don't want to pay for our new Nikes."
Posted by Orv on May 14, 2012 at 4:18 PM
Timrrr 20
I suspect, as usual, this all goes back to a lack of proper research by the "anarchists" ahead of time.

I'm sure they read the article about the cops wanting to videotape protests and assumed that that would be a reality at this riot, so they developed tactics --like the one-handed-camera-off-the-shouder-flip -- to combat it.

Of course, then they failed to follow up on the reports and learn that the SPD hadn't been approved to film protesters in general yet!

Then they went from bad to worse by assuming, in their anti-authoritarian paranoia, that anyone with a professional video camera must be a secret SPD plant, out to get `em on tape, and attacked the very media they were there to ape in front of!

Genius!!!
Posted by Timrrr on May 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM
21
@11

TL;DR:

Go to your internets and do some research on "deblocing" technique. The neo-smashists are generous enough to post this stuff for anyone interested to see.

Slightly longer:

They get a group of at least 50 people together wearing black bloc costume, they run to a place where the police aren't observing, 6-10 of the smashists smash some stuff within 20 seconds (while others do lookout, or have other roles, like any street gang) and then everyone shuffles around madly and the entire 50+ group takes off their comedy-ninja costumes at the same time, so even if you do get clear video (hah) you're playing three-card-monte in trying to figure out which of the neo-smashists did the actual smashing.

But it's entirely peaceful protest, of course. This is totally not violence.
Posted by robotslave on May 15, 2012 at 12:20 AM
22
Black bloc'ers attack media people because the police do things like, oh I dunno... issue subpoenas for their footage in the hopes of using it as evidence to identify and prosecute them.

What is worse:
1. smashing windows of corporations that use slave labor/banks that take advantage of poor, hopeful homeowners
2. someone having to spend months or years in jail for smashing said windows

Come the fuck on.

And stop with the conspiracy theory bullshit--is it that difficult to imagine that some people are this angry and that the police are this inept?
Posted by bdurruti on May 15, 2012 at 9:23 AM

Add a comment