Thursday, May 3, 2012

Meet the Women Who Are Suing Rob McKenna for Being a Liar

Posted by on Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM

Nikki Mackey takes a moment to collect herself.
  • The Stranger
  • Nikki Mackey takes a moment to collect herself.
"I’m 38 years old and I’m a cancer survivor and I will be for the rest of my life," explained Melissa "Nikki" Mackey, a slight woman with a tremulous voice, by way of introduction. "But cancer was not in my plans."


Less than two years ago, Mackey was diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer, nine months after losing her job. Fortunately, she had extended health insurance coverage through COBRA to help shoulder the costs of four surgeries (including two mastectomies), the 16 rounds of chemotherapy, and the continued, targeted chemo she continues to receive to this day to help ensure her aggressive cancer doesn't return.

She struggles to pay for chemo, therapy, and her monthly insurance premiums, estimating that her recent treatments have cost $250,000 alone.

And in front of a small crowd this morning, Mackey wept as she described the fear she lived with, knowing "that Rob McKenna and others with a political agenda are desperately seeking to take away the Affordable Care Act." Because if they succeed, Mackey will likely be subjected to the lifetime caps on insurance coverage ($1 million to $8 million caps that the ACA immediately repealed), which means that, at some point, she won't be able to afford the kind of medical care that is keeping her alive and healthy.

Nikki is just one of 90 Washington women suing state Attorney General and gubernatorial wannabe Rob McKenna for breach of ethics and lying about the ramifications of his national pursuit to overturn Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA), as Goldy reported in detail this morning.

Another plaintiff in the lawsuit against McKenna, Karah Pino, spoke of how a car accident left her with permanent damage to her hands and spine. Although Pino had car and health insurance, and even though the other (insured) driver admitted fault, the $100,000 payout was not enough to cover all of her medical bills. She and her 20-month-old son now live in poverty. Pino is unable to make more than $900 a month or risk losing the Medicaid coverage she qualifies for as a single parent. "The past two years, I have been counting down to 2014 and staying at home with my son," Pino says, waiting for the day that she'll qualify for subsidies offered through the ACA and can build a life for herself and her son without fearing it'll cost them their health coverage.

When pressed by reporters on the political timing of the lawsuit's filing, given that McKenna is in the belly of a tight governor's race, lead attorney Knoll Lowney swiftly replied, "The governor's race is so insignificant when compared to the decision before US court that your question almost makes no sense.”

"This case is about McKenna’s performance as an AG," he continued.

"I didn’t get cancer for a political reasons and I didn’t endure 20 months of chemo for a governor’s race," Mackey smartly added. "I don’t care who’s governor."

But even as this lawsuit is being framed as a women's health issue, the important thing to remember as 90 women gear up to sue the pompadour off Rob McKenna is that his actions adversely affect the health of every Washington resident.

For instance, since the staggered implementation of the ACA began in 2010, all new health plans must now cover preventative services—like flu shots, prenatal screenings, colon cancer screenings, and blood pressure tests—without a co-payment.

The act also allows 52,000 young Washington residents to stay on their parents health insurance plans until age 26; It prohibits insurance companies from dropping policies once their clients become sick; It ensures that children with pre-existing conditions can't be denied coverage; And it forces insurance companies to publicly justify raising their premium rates by 10 percent or more.

But all of those benefits and protections could be voided if McKenna and his cronies succeed on overturning the entire ACA, and not simply the individual mandate, as McKenna has repeatedly professed to the residents of Washington.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Westlake, son! 1
Knoll Lowney swiftly replied, "The governor's race is so insignificant when compared to the decision before US court that your question almost makes no sense.”

Hell yeah, telling it like it is. Awesome.
Posted by Westlake, son! on May 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM
2
How can I help this brave woman in her political efforts? Sign me up!
Posted by RopinTheWind on May 3, 2012 at 3:27 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 3
Shouldn't she be suing Gregoire for not implementing Romneycare back in 2005?

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on May 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM
TVDinner 4
Jesus, Bailo. What the fuck are you talking about? This is a life or death issue for many of us. Can't you just shut the fuck up for five seconds and let the adults have a conversation?
Posted by TVDinner http:// on May 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM
5
McKenna is going to win this nuisance lawsuit. He and his cohorts are also going to win the ACA lawsuit, and he's going to win the governor's mansion. Deal.
Posted by Reality on May 3, 2012 at 6:00 PM
6
@3: Huh?
Posted by Farts Weird on May 3, 2012 at 6:20 PM
7
These stories are moving, but how many more would there be if our stealth-neoliberal president had tackled the problem head-on with a public option, instead of caving to insurance corporations?

This lawsuit is a good thing, but we need to call bullshit on the ACA. We know the bill is rubbish because Wall Street liked it. No amount of thunderous liberal hand-wringing will change that.
Posted by Che Guava on May 4, 2012 at 6:52 AM
YakHerder 8
I applaud the women for bringing Rob McKenna's terrible views on health care into the public eye.

As a law nerd, though, I'd bet that this case will be dismissed fairly quickly, likely under the doctrine of "standing."

To "have standing" (which is necessary for a court to hear your case), you have to show three things: (1) You've been harmed in a way that's personal to you (and not a harm shared by the public in general). (2) You also have to show that the person you're suing caused the harm. (3) You also have to show that, if you win your suit, the harm you suffered would be addressed.

As bad as McKenna's actions have been, I think it's going to be a stretch for any of the women to show all three of these things.
Posted by YakHerder on May 4, 2012 at 6:53 AM
Theodore Gorath 9
@7: The ACA makes some very important changes, even if it is a poor shadow of real reform. You have to keep in mind though, that this is America, and even getting just this passed is pretty groundbreaking. Baby steps.

In general though, I wish we could sue any elected official when they tell harmful lies. Give 'em hell ladies.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on May 4, 2012 at 8:19 AM
10
If wall street loves the ACA so much how come they spent millions in lobby fees and gave the GOP money to vote against it? Also, the public option is still available for states who want to have one but if President Obama pursued a public option, thousands who work for the insurance companies would have been laided off immediately and the idiot who suggested suing the current governor for not implementing Romneycare is because you live in the state of Washington NOT Massachusetts A hole.
Posted by Jojothecat on May 4, 2012 at 9:32 AM
11
Wait a minute. Aren't they suing him on the basis of lying? I don't see anything in the article that says what they claim he's lying about. Sounds like all they're concerned about is that they might lose some benefits they never earned in the first place.
Posted by smascrag on May 4, 2012 at 5:06 PM
12
I love you Nikki!
Posted by HugsToNikki on July 9, 2012 at 1:29 AM

Add a comment