Thursday, April 26, 2012

The Thursday Morning News

Posted by on Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:56 AM

Go get a job! After embarrassing himself by yelling at a young woman to "go get a job," Attorney General Rob McKenna finally admitted he opposes Washington's Reproductivity Parity Act. Unfortunately for voters, it turns out his legalistic explanation is a pack of lies.

Police still need your help. 21-year-old Nicole Westbrook, who was shot in the face near Pioneer Square early Sunday morning, has died of her wounds. Police are asking the public to help find her killer.

"Doing away with the death penalty was the only way to ensure it would not be unfairly imposed". Governor Dannel Malloy signed legislation yesterday making Connecticut the 17th state to abolish the death penalty. Washington still has the death penalty, and it doesn't seem to deter murder here.

Mixed news. Home sales are up, but so are first time unemployment claims.

Watch out Bush and Cheney! Former Liberian President Charles Taylor has become the first former head of state to be convicted of war crimes.

Time to lay off a Mario brother? Video game giant Nintendo has reported its first annual loss in more than 30 years, blaming a strong yen and increasing handheld gaming competition from smartphones. Cue electronic "game over" music.

This is what comes from watching too much Fox News. During testimony before a parliamentary inquiry panel yesterday, media mogul Rupert Murdoch described British Prime Minister David Cameron’s disabled son as “retarded.” Here's hoping by the time this phone hacking scandal is over Cameron will be able to describe Murdoch's son as a "convict."

Meet the future top executives of Walmart, Mexico. Four TSA screeners at Los Angeles International Airport have been arrested on charges that they took thousands of dollars in bribes to allow drugs through the airport's security checkpoints. Hmm. I guess now I know how to get that contraband 6-oz bottle of mouthwash through security.

Hope he likes eating alone in the council lunchroom. Seattle City Council member Mike O'Brien is proposing new rules to dismantle political war chests by imposing a $5,000 cap on the amount of campaign funds that can be rolled over from one campaign to the next.

Doctor says he found the G-spot! Not surprisingly, it's in the vagina.

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Fifty-Two-Eighty 1
You missed Jimmy Carter's comment about Romney.

I'd rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable. Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive that he was fairly competent as a governor.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on April 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM
Theodore Gorath 2
Glad to see that the death penalty in this country is slowly being dismantled.

Barbarism and state-sponsored murder for the sake of unattainable vengeance should not be the purview of our government.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on April 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM
Fnarf 3
Oh, I am so sorry for poor Nicole Westbrook and her family. They will never see our city the same way again, will they? I am ashamed for us and the murderous welcome we gave her.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on April 26, 2012 at 9:16 AM
Max Solomon 4
@1: carter's right. romney's less objectionable that 99% of republicans. but he's still unacceptable because of congress & the SCOTUS.

obama's not coming after your obsessively cleaned and oiled armory, so start thinking about more than 1 issue.
Posted by Max Solomon on April 26, 2012 at 9:21 AM
5
@2

Oh you're no fun anymore.
Posted by Central Scrutinizer on April 26, 2012 at 9:33 AM
6
@ 2 I for one am not, the death penalty is sometimes the only just and fair method and if one feels there is doubt with a death row inmate then don't execute him, but sometimes there is no doubt, see Tim McVeigh. I have always considered myself a center-left guy being in favor of universal health care, marriage equality, being pro choice, wanting the rich to pay there fair share but there is some things that the left do that get under mys skin and this is one of them.
Posted by Democrat1234 on April 26, 2012 at 9:33 AM
TortoiseTurtle 7
@6, too bad, you're still wrong.
Posted by TortoiseTurtle http://slog.thestranger.com on April 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM
Keister Button 8
Anyone else find it sweet that a black Canadian playing for Washington Capitals scored a winning, Game 7 OT goal against the one white American on the Boston Bruins who didn't join his team for a visit with the President?
Posted by Keister Button on April 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM
9
I am ashamed for us and the murderous welcome we gave her."

Us? Speak for yourself. Yet another case of the usual suspects but white Seattle liberals just stick their fingers in their ears and hope to ignore the reality. She should have listened to John Derbyshire.
Posted by Reality Sucks on April 26, 2012 at 9:52 AM
10
I'm so sorry for Nicole Westbrook's family. It's heartbreaking. I can't imagine the pain they must feel right now.

It's little comfort to the family, but the police will eventually catch those worthless pieces of shit that shot her. There were too many witnesses. Somebody will crack.
Posted by tkc on April 26, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Rotten666 11

@10 Don't be so sure. Danny Vega's murderers still walk the street. And they got those fuckers on video.

Posted by Rotten666 on April 26, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Vince 12
Murdoch is proof that even a clueless twit can get rich. And it's hereditary.
Posted by Vince on April 26, 2012 at 10:48 AM
13
RIP Ms Westbrook, condolences to loved ones.

@1 High praise indeed.

@6 It's easy to say not to execute if there's doubt. Do you know how that has actually worked?

As for McVeigh, was even that a good idea? Aside from your selection of a very extreme example, weren't there a lot of questions about what he might have known that he hadn't divulged? Was there a bigger conspiracy? In terms of intelligence value, he may have been better to keep alive than to kill.
Posted by seatackled on April 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM
Theodore Gorath 14
@6: I am unsure that murdering a prisoner is ever just. Something about taking a man who is already in shackles, quite removed from society, and killing him just screams injustice, regardless of what he did. Do you support beating the hell out a man in shackles if he assaulted someone else?

If an eye for an eye is "fair" and "just," I imagine you also believe rapists should be raped for punishment? The reason we established a justice system was to get away from the barbaric, vengeance-based punishments for crimes.

Shouldn't those who calls themselves "just" be above murdering people who commit murder?

This does not even touch on the whole aspect of false imprisonment. At least people who are released after 30 years of false imprisonment have something left. I guarentee you that as a nation, we have executed at least one innocent man, and to me, that makes us all murderers, since our taxes went to the killing, and our political mindset made it possible. I never want that to happen again.

Posted by Theodore Gorath on April 26, 2012 at 10:57 AM
merry 15
I bawled like a baby when I heard about Nicole Westbrook on the news this morning.

What Fnarf said @3.

I just hope they do catch these subhumans - how many people walking around today have the knowledge of exactly WHO took this young woman's life? God I hope the cops catch up with them...
Posted by merry on April 26, 2012 at 11:03 AM
SPG 16
Texas executed an innocent man.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/…

They were pretty damn sure he was guilty at the end of the trial, yet they know now that he was definitely innocent.
This is one that we know about. How many others are there?
Posted by SPG on April 26, 2012 at 11:49 AM
17
@11 The Polics know who killed Vega. They just haven't arrested all of them yet (2 were arrested for a separate assault). But those pieces of shit are getting put away eventually. Once one get's arrested they always plea out on each other. It's inevitable.

http://publicola.com/2012/01/23/police-i…
Posted by tkc on April 26, 2012 at 12:13 PM
zombie eyes 18
By the time it's over, hopefully, one of Murdoch's son's fellow inmates will find his G-spot.
Posted by zombie eyes on April 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM
19
If an eye for an eye is "fair" and "just," I imagine you also believe rapists should be raped for punishment?


By that logic, anyone found guilty of kidnapping shouldn't be imprisoned because that's "eye for an eye". The maxim against "eye for an eye" came from a time when there was no rule of law, just competing clans getting embroiled in blood feuds. The government cutting off a thief's hand was an *improvement*.

I oppose the death penalty for largely practical reasons, and, if you're ever to quench Americans' bloodlust, that is the argument you're going to have to sell them: that the death penalty is too expensive for what it does (not) do (prevention of crime) and that innocent people get executed. The argument that murderers don't deserve to die will fall on deaf ears.
Posted by keshmeshi on April 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM
Theodore Gorath 20
@16: That is the ultimate irony of the death penalty. Since we as a nation support the death penalty (financially or philosophically), and we have put at least one innocent man to death, we all deserve the death penalty, because we all contributed to this murder.

That is, if you believe anyone deserves the death penalty.
Posted by Theodore Gorath on April 26, 2012 at 12:19 PM
lark 21
I favor Capital Punishment. In fact part of me says, in light of Nicole Westbrook's (now) murder, should the perpetrator be apprehended, tried and convicted and the prosecution ask for the Death Penalty, I would support it. But, I would be fine if the perp spent the rest of his life behind bars. It is greatly tragic what happened to that young woman. She just arrived here and was only 21 y/o. Senseless.

Goldy,
Nary a chance that Bush, Cheney et al will be tried for "war crimes" anywhere, anytime or anymore than Obama will be for murder (ordering a drone strike on 2 Americans in Yemen). Simply will not happen. On the other hand, I'm elated that Taylor was convicted. Finally, some justice for his victims in Liberia. What a monster.
Posted by lark on April 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM
22
The death penalty is barbaric. Pure and simple.
Posted by tkc on April 26, 2012 at 2:00 PM
23
I'm against the death penalty because it's expensive and accomplishes nothing useful. It's millions of dollars wasted on vengeful bloodlust that could've been spent on cops or schools that actually make a positive difference in our communities. If you want to reduce government waste, the death penalty should be the first thing to go!
Posted by I have always been... east coaster on April 26, 2012 at 2:55 PM
long-time reader 24
If you subscribe to a just desserts model of criminal law, then the deterrent value of the death penalty is irrelevant. Just sayin'.
Posted by long-time reader on April 26, 2012 at 10:04 PM

Add a comment