Friday, November 6, 2009

Are Late Voters McGinn Voters?

Posted by Dominic Holden on Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:18 PM

By comparing voter rolls to records of ballots received by the county, Mike McGinn's mayoral campaign found that uncounted votes include far more of the youngest demographic, which are McGinn's voters, than counted votes. In contrast, uncounted votes include about 50 percent fewer voters over 65 years old than the previous counted votes.

King County Elections has counted 137,025 ballots form Seattle voters and about has received an additional 55,000 ballots.
  • King County Elections has counted 137,025 ballots from Seattle voters and the McGinn camp estimates the county has an additional 55,000 uncounted ballots on hand.

In a recent SurveyUSA poll, you can see that McGinn's base is among voters 18 to 34. In contrast, Joe Mallahan's base is older voters, especially voters over 65 years old. In other words: Uncounted ballots appear to represent younger voters—who are more likely to be McGinn supporters—than the votes already counted. This could mean that the next batch of votes puts McGinn over the edge.

Late voters could also be McGinn voters if they read The Stranger.

According to Google Analytics, the Stranger's bill of endorsements—which give a hearty endorsement to McGinn—was viewed by 43,933 unique individuals. Of those, about 18,500 people viewed our endorsements in the last three days before the election. (That's not even counting cheat-sheet downloads from the home page or three issues of the paper around town that had our endorsement cheat sheet.) So those are late voters, they're mostly likely young voters, they are probably mostly McGinn voters, and they are voters whose ballots may not have been counted yet.

Seattle is estimated to have 213,841 total ballots when it's all said and done.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
so you're starting to believe your own polls?
Posted by Credulous Crud on November 6, 2009 at 4:21 PM
Renton Mike 2
It also doesn't count those who saw the signs on the boxes containing the paper.
Posted by Renton Mike on November 6, 2009 at 4:24 PM
3
Or more likely trying to find something to do before 4:30...
Posted by Matt the Engineer on November 6, 2009 at 4:24 PM
4
the new #'s are up.

Mcginn 49.99
Mallahands 49.19

which takes this out of the recount zone for now as you need <2000 vote diff AND <.5% diff
Posted by miked on November 6, 2009 at 4:25 PM
5
The answer (to at least one of your questions) is "yes!"
Mayor

Mike McGinn 75657 49.99%

Joe Mallahan 74448 49.19%

That's a jump.
Posted by Concerned Voting Citizen on November 6, 2009 at 4:25 PM
6
I and all the close friends I talked to (about 8 of us) voted Friday or later. All under 32, all voted McGinn.
Posted by L8 is gr8 on November 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Simply Me 7
I'm happy for McGinn, and I'm happy to see that the already victorious approve referendum 71 lead continues to grow. Is Stickney still praying away the gay or has he conceded?
Posted by Simply Me on November 6, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Westlake, son! 8
I'm not a later voter, I'm a very early voter. Drop box on 4th ave. But haven't counted my ballot yet.
Posted by Westlake, son! on November 6, 2009 at 7:42 PM
Fnarf 9
@8, yes they have.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM
NaFun 10
My ballot hasn't been counted yet either, and I voted for McGinn and R-71 of course.
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on November 6, 2009 at 8:11 PM
11
Wow, that's a strong statement to make based on Google Analytics.

I know you guys don't usually pretend to be technologically astute, but Google Analytics numbers are subject to so many mitigating factors that to claim any concrete numbers it produces as fact is foolish.
Posted by meks on November 11, 2009 at 8:09 AM

Add a comment