I could not force myself to slog (heh) through all of that he-said she-alledgedly-said bullshit. Does it really take 1600 words to make a salient point here?
I thought the article was hilarious. Then again, I've spent a lot of time reading heavily-yet-pointlessly redacted records generated by SPD. The literary hallmark of SPD recordkeeping is a method of pouring a thick lacquer of formality over heaps of hilariously phony bullshit, run it up the chain of command for signing, and then stick it in a drawer, hopefully never to be seen outside the agency.
Which is why I find Seattleish's article so damn hilarious. But it's probably just me.
I'm familiar with the background on this story and with the work of each the subjects. I thoroughly enjoyed the Seattleish piece. It didn't seem overly lengthy to me.
Which is why I find Seattleish's article so damn hilarious. But it's probably just me.