Given the expense of arbitration, the first case seems like a wise reduction, but it is insane that we have a system where we can't call it misconduct if it was a mistake which was taken responsibility for. I got fired from a job in retail where I lost $100. I immediately took responsibility and spent time trying to find the money, but I got fired despite my boss going to bat for me. She lost several times that much money in cocaine, and doesn't even get a misconduct?
As I said yesterday, Murray is taking an Olympic-size dive into an Olympic-size hole on this one. How can a guy who campaigned as being the "adult" who would fix McGinn's "adolescent" leadership jump so fast and so publicly into the abyss?
Yesterday, City Council announced that Bruce Harrell, chair of their Public Safety, Civil Rights, and Technology Committee, "has scheduled a Special Public Safety Cmte re: SPD Disciplinary Review & complaint processes for this Wed, 2pm."
I'm not reading the same thing here. Isn't retraining potentially more productive than a suspension? Reeducation vs a professional time-out? What's the BFD?
...In granting the training referrals, Bailey’s actions mean the officers’ names are no longer subject to public disclosure; their cases can’t be listed on a data-collection system to track officer behavior; their erased misconduct can’t be used in gauging punishment for any future misconduct; and their cases can’t be used for comparative purposes in deciding other disciplinary cases, according to a source familiar with the matter.
We really need to start putting these arbitrators under the spotlight. They apparently seem to be the thing officials are afraid of, or at least are providing them political cover. No sense in disciplining anyone because it *might* be overturned by an arbitrator? WTF? Not just the stranger, but the entire media needs to start giving arbitrators and the arbitration process a lot more scrutiny. Who are these arbitrators? How are they selected? Who holds them accountable? Apparently the arbitration system favors unions way too much, or at least gives officials the perception they will lose in arbitration against a union so they just truck their tails and run rather than pursue discipline. Another good example, the cop in Marysville who was fired because he leaves dangerous objects, like guns, within reach of children who then kill other children with them. If that isn't a blatant example of someone's total incompetence to be a cop I don't know what is. So they fired him. And guess what? An arbitrator gave him his job back. I want to know, who was this arbitrator? What's his or her name? What's his or her qualifications? Who hired this arbitrator? And what do we have to do to get incompetent arbitrators fired? It's fine and good to keep up the pressure on the administration Stranger, but it's time to bring some pressure on the arbitration system while we're at it.
@15, that was really a response to "What's the BFD?". I agree that it wasn't a necessary outcome, because the misconduct could have been sustained while also requiring remedial training, without having reversal of suspension overturn the misconduct as a matter of process. It's the autopilot thing that seems an infuriatingly sly dodge.
The only way Murray can save face at this point is the immediate dismissal of Bailey. If he is unwilling to do that Murray should be recalled.
How many weeks has this jack ass been on the job? 5? 6? Christ, what a colossal fuck up.
The video that Phil M. posts @9 is important to watch. A little dry, like most Council discussion but it is really thoughtful about the complications, accountability & SPOG's role in the negotiations. Good discussion.
In 2012 the Seattle Human Rights Commission submitted a Report on Police Accountability. The report noted that to meet human rights standards, a police accountability system must:1) be run by an independent, neutral body with the power to investigate and impose discipline as necessary 2) provide all the parties an opportunity to be heard 3) allow appeal to an independent decision-maker and 4) be transparent. The current oversight system fails on all four points and the recent debacle is an event that will reoccur until an independent civilian review board with the power to investigate and render binding disciplinary decisions is established.
As we did in 2012, the Seattle Human Rights Commission is calling for the creation of an independent civilian review board. As #7 correctly notes, the Mayor and the City Council must be prepared to make the creation of such a panel a non-negotiable term of any new contract with SPD. Until this fundamental reform occurs, real police reform will not have been accomplished.
I mean.. What?
Astonishing feat. Tryouts for 2018 begin now.
...and Murray has a long, long - ahem, long - list of quid pro quo political debts to settle.
Don't ask too many questions or I'll frickin' drone your house, bro.
Why the deafening silence from U.S. Attorney Jenny Durkan, overseer Merrick Bobb, the Seattle Human Rights Commission?
Are they all just biding their time and paying out rope for Murray and Bailey to hang themselves?
How many weeks has this jack ass been on the job? 5? 6? Christ, what a colossal fuck up.
As we did in 2012, the Seattle Human Rights Commission is calling for the creation of an independent civilian review board. As #7 correctly notes, the Mayor and the City Council must be prepared to make the creation of such a panel a non-negotiable term of any new contract with SPD. Until this fundamental reform occurs, real police reform will not have been accomplished.