@2: Indeed. I hadn't watched Leno for a while and I tuned in a couple days ago and I was pretty uncomfortable listening to him fat shame Christie. Sometimes I forget that I live in a bubble where people recognize that things like fat shaming are unacceptable.
I'm no defender of Facebook, but you should be calling bullshit on Marilyn McKenna. She paid Facebook to promote her page, and the agreement was she would not target kids under 18 for weight loss products. Did you read the story at the link?
@8: No study is needed to know that guns kill people. Not study is needed to know that bad people kill good people. No study is needed to know that good people can kill bad people so the bad people don't kill the good people first.
@6 I hear ya - facebook is paid to promote her page and they have rules regarding that service.
Clearly, she has experienced weight loss but was she 'caught' promoting a product related to that? I saw no mention of any. Is she a well-know endorser of some weight-loss product or service?
Consider: Could she not show herself enjoying a nameless glass of wine without violating facebook's "over 18" rules?
@12, at best it's a contract dispute. It's not a first amendment issue. I know a photographer who had to remove a pregnancy photo from Facebook. That's a relevant story, not somebody complaining after they paid Facebook and should have know the terms.
Please provide, if you can, a reasonable study that backs up your assertion.
No study is needed to know that bad people will kill good people using the good people's own guns against them.
Clearly, she has experienced weight loss but was she 'caught' promoting a product related to that? I saw no mention of any. Is she a well-know endorser of some weight-loss product or service?
Consider: Could she not show herself enjoying a nameless glass of wine without violating facebook's "over 18" rules?