Blogs
Mar 12, 2013 at 12:24 pm
Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
I guess the only really safe couple, according to this guy, are lesbians.
Of course, he completely left them out, as these dumbasses usually do.
And yeah, this guy has thought about anal sex way too much.
And now for something completely different, y'all should check out today's Mister Deity and tell your friends, Mr. D. hit a home run on this one: "And I'm a Forman" (former-Mormon)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfkHJmHYn…
Sadly, the democratization of knowledge is undermining democracy.
Flames, there are, FLAMES, at the side of my face...
Sincerely,
Biochemist-but-seriously-it-just-takes-a-basic-science-education.
I think he's just afraid that if gays can get married, they will start having sex at home in their own beds, instead of sneaking out to meet up with him in the cruising park!
I guess since the problem is just sperm in rectums, he must believe lesbian marriages are just fine. Sperm free.
Seriously, and the "science" aside, I think this is one of the main issues with those who oppose same sex marriage. It's as if they believe that if those damn gays just didn't get married, they'd stop having that damned gay sex.
Not allowing people to marry has nothing to do with stopping them from having sex. Why doesn't someone point out this ridonculous fallacy?
And given that, I think a big part of anti-gay marriage is motivated by resentment. These closet cases can't stop thinking about hot, hot gay buttseks but pushed down their natural urges to have passionless sex with their disappointed wives. They're pissed that guys who aren't such fucking cowards might get all the marriage perks that they sold their souls for.
Buttsex: a higher percentage of straight couples practice it than there are gay couples.
Would they?
Speak for yourself, Nixon.
That actually makes more sense than what the guy is saying.
@21,
Nice!
It's funny cuz it's kinda true!
Looks like a job for Lord Wyman Manderly.
But if two men have sex, it would be possible for their child (which, again, would be inevitable, as their bodies are helpless to shut that down) to receive two Y chromosomes. Now, again, I'm not a biologist, but I would expect that that would mean the child would be born with two wieners, and no butt. It would probably have to poop out of its butt-wiener. And I imagine if a child got one of each, but in the wrong order, it would have its butt and its wiener switched around.
Now again, genetics is not my field of expertise, but I'm pretty sure that's how chromosomes work.
Whew, he's someone with ISSUES.
"was side box because twenty four hundred dollars for one course abuse I hurt you"
and "a very ross perot and wrote down in the uh... fancies but mile of these."
A young man came out to his parents. "I'm gay," he said.
Tears collected in his mother's eyes. "We always suspected," she said, "And we love you just as we always have."
The father remained silent.
Later, the father took the son aside and said. "I'm gonna love you no matter what. But I'm curious about this gay thing. What exactly do two gay guys do?"
The son said, "Well, Dad, you know those things you're always trying to get Mom to do that she won't do? That's what we do."
This guy is so BDT...(back door trade).
Our vaginas and uteri are freakin' magical with their ability to shut down that whole process of infection transmission and pregnancy by rape-delivered sperm.
Nope, no way, no how.
I couldn't get past the first 30 seconds of his speech. As soon as he got into that stuff about what happens when you ejaculate into a vagina vs ejaculating into an anus, and barriers. It's easy to spot red flags like that for pseudoscience. He probably went on to say something about how that causes AIDS or something.
Sorry, it's not about resentment. The cold hard truth is, it's mostly about 'disgust'. Most people in most societies in the world seem to have an inherent reaction of 'disgust' at the thought of man-on-man sex. It's visceral and nearly universal & this dude is representing that view well. He ain't gay, he's 'disgusted' as most people in the world seem to be. Don't believe me? Poll a bunch of people from non-western cultures about man-on-man sex & observe their instinctive winces, you'll see. Progressive people in the U.S./Europe only as of late have been trying to overcome that instinctual feeling, but it has taken work. For whatever reason, woman-on-woman sex doesn't provoke the same 'disgust' reaction in most people. Anyway, it's this natural 'disgust' instinct in most people that drives homophobia, not really 'hate.'
You and Frey should go bowling.
What you're describing is the result of hundred of years of the Abrahamic religions' proscription of same-sex behaviour, under penalty of death. It's absolutely not "instinctual".
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_histor… (extracts below) :
"The earliest documents concerning same-sex relationships come from Ancient Greece. Such relationships did not replace marriage between man and woman, but occurred before and beside it."
"In Roman patriarchal society, it was socially acceptable for an adult male citizen to take the penetrative role in same-sex relations."
"Homosexuality has been acknowledged in China since ancient times. Scholar Pan Guangdan (潘光旦) came to the conclusion that nearly every emperor in the Han Dynasty had one or more male sex partners. There are also descriptions of lesbians in some history books."
"In South Asia the Hijra are a caste of third-gender, or transgender group who live a feminine role. Hijra may be born male or intersex, and some may have been born female."
"In many societies of Melanesia, especially in Papua New Guinea, same-sex relationships were, until the middle of the last century, an integral part of the culture. The Etoro and Marind-anim for example, even viewed heterosexuality as sinful and celebrated homosexuality instead."
"Though often ignored or suppressed by European explorers and colonialists, homosexual expression in native Africa was also present and took a variety of forms. Anthropologists Stephen Murray and Will Roscoe reported that women in Lesotho engaged in socially sanctioned "long term, erotic relationships," named motsoalle."
@60 I think I understand now what you mean. You mean the same 'inherent reaction of disgust' that is expressed by both genders of western-civilization kiddies when they first learn of penis-in-vagina sex. Right ?
Yes, that exists. But those feelings of disgust towards PiV sex are not naturally held past puberty - except when there are religious types who severely insist on keeping them alive (check out the male Hasidic youth who are only told of PiV sex half an hour before their own marriage, and who faint or vomit upon learning of it - I think it's the Gur people).
Why should PiR sex be held to different standards that PiV ? Had you learned of penis-in-rectum sex at the same age you heard of penis-in-vagina, and had adults around you told you that it's a normal part of adult sexuality (heterosexual and homosexual), you would have overcome your initial childhood disgust by now.
Don't you think ?
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-en…
Baptist minister with theatrical aspirations before he was "called by god". Yay for ignorance!
Since most of the second X is inactivated anyway, they're effectively only missing the pseudo-autosomal region of one X chromosome, and so it's not as severe as missing any other chromosome. Affected individuals are phenotypically female and usually infertile. The condition is caused by a meiotic nondisjunction event, where the sex chromosomes don't segregate to the daughter cells properly.
Heck, as near as I can tell, most of us have a natural revulsion to work that we have to overcome in order to function.
off topic I know. :)