That thing was always a sad joke. Not worth the cost of operations and the minor traffic disturbance it causes.
A gondola, or something not-at-grade, might be an option.
Or after it bounces up to Union Station, have it go back to the waterfront, then up railroad ave, head down first to at least Royal Brougham or down to the new arena or even Lander.
@7: I'm thinking the only reason you haven't been banned yet is because you're just too amusing. May you merrily troll along on your gay troll trolley forever!
The real tragedy of not having the streetcar at this moment in time is that the tunnel projects would supposedly have been required to replace it had it existed when that plan was approved. Now it's probably too late to get something useful
"making the waterfront car more than a cutesy showpiece for tourists"
I'm ok with appealing to tourists. Most cities would die for our quantity of tourists, but we mostly ignore them. Before I moved to Seattle I knew about: The Monorail (though assumed it was a full system), The Space Needle, and The Waterfront Trolley. I hadn't even heard of Pike Place Market.
I'm also fine with using a modern streetcar and bringing the First Hill line to the water. But sometimes the transit world just looks at hard facts and numbers (hey, a bus would be cheaper!) and ignores softer benefits like our city through the eyes of tourists.
Having lived in Melbourne for a few years, where that trolley originally came from, I want to endorse Dominic's suggestion. Melbourne has a fantastic streetcar system that's accessible, functional and useful, covering the entire metro area. When I moved here, riding that waterfront car was a nice bit of nostalgia but also kind of sad, because it's none of those things -- just a novelty. Put in a proper streetcar line, and then put in a dozen more after that.
It wasn't even OUR novelty antique car. It was an old Melbourne tram. If you want to see those in action, just rent the lovely Australian movie "Malcolm", with Colin Friels. It looked dumb here in Seattle. But yeah, extend the real one, that's fine.
Hey, I know! Let's build a whole bunch of unconnected, un-coordinated separate little trolley lines, each with their own infrastructure (eg. trolley barns), and their own purposes, and run by separate groups! They can each charge a different amount to ride them too, just to make things more confusing! No centralized website or information so riders can use them effectively, and definitely don't make them part of the Metro transit authority! Heck no! We can have hyperlocal light rail, and be lauded as some sort of visionary transit "innovators." Hey look! A monorail that goes all of 10 blocks! Fake BRT! A half-dozen trolleys! A pequeño light-rail system! Three different bus companies! SO CUTE!
Uhm, speaking as a [dreaded?] tourist to Seattle, can I ask that your city provide some way to cross the tracks to get from the sculpture garden to the waterfront park? Please? 'Cause I felt like Alice trying to get to the top of the hill when I wanted to go from one park to the other: Just couldn't get there without walking miles out of my way.
It was lame. If there had been two sets of tracks and cars had left every ten minutes or fifteen minutes, it'd have been fine, but I think departures were 20 minutes apart, and then along the way the car would have to wait at one of those passing areas for the trolly traveling the other direction to come.
@24 so you're saying we SHOULDN'T tell you about the airport escalator sidewalks we are putting in around Wallingford and Fremont to help with the east-west commute?
No reason not to bring the cars back - you could easily run them in conjunction with modern cars, just need high and low platforms on the same stop. Done in plenty of places.
You'll first have to convince the City that actually having transportation that isn't cars on the waterfront is an important goal. Then figure out which right-of-way in the Corner proposal you're willing to shrink in order to have dedicated trolley track, or accept street-running a la the SLUT and FHSC.
George Benson was a great Councilmember. Those cars are part of Seattle's history, even though they didn't begin life here. And as Matt the Engineer points out, plenty of tourists rode and loved them, including plenty of non-Seattle Washington tourists whose dollars helped keep hotels, bars and restaurants busy.
So yeah, bring it back. You wanna run modern streetcars down there too, go for it.
Yes, please bring the trolley back, and I LOVE the idea of connecting it to the First Hill streetcar! I work near the waterfront miss riding the trolley. It's ridiculous that the trolley has been inactive for as long as the sculpture park has been at its base. Also, the jillions of tourists coming off the cruise ships really need an option besides taxis for getting to the Market and P-Square.
A gondola, or something not-at-grade, might be an option.
Or after it bounces up to Union Station, have it go back to the waterfront, then up railroad ave, head down first to at least Royal Brougham or down to the new arena or even Lander.
The only thing wrong with it was it need to have more cars, so instead of 30 minutes between cars, it could be down to 15 or even 10
We can bring it back ONLY if it's done as musical theater.
I'm ok with appealing to tourists. Most cities would die for our quantity of tourists, but we mostly ignore them. Before I moved to Seattle I knew about: The Monorail (though assumed it was a full system), The Space Needle, and The Waterfront Trolley. I hadn't even heard of Pike Place Market.
I'm also fine with using a modern streetcar and bringing the First Hill line to the water. But sometimes the transit world just looks at hard facts and numbers (hey, a bus would be cheaper!) and ignores softer benefits like our city through the eyes of tourists.
No alcohol, cause that would be bad. Except for specific licensed events, like weddings.
Seriously.
Now for the Bubbleator ... where do we put that?
I wouldn't mind seeing an actual streetcar in the same route, but I doubt even that is the best use of our transit dollars.
By Waterfront Park you mean the one at pier 57-59?
By "sculpture garden" do you mean the Olympic Sculpture Park?
That's a fairly straight shot of less than mile.
I suppose you are referring to entirely different places though.
You'll first have to convince the City that actually having transportation that isn't cars on the waterfront is an important goal. Then figure out which right-of-way in the Corner proposal you're willing to shrink in order to have dedicated trolley track, or accept street-running a la the SLUT and FHSC.
George Benson was a great Councilmember. Those cars are part of Seattle's history, even though they didn't begin life here. And as Matt the Engineer points out, plenty of tourists rode and loved them, including plenty of non-Seattle Washington tourists whose dollars helped keep hotels, bars and restaurants busy.
So yeah, bring it back. You wanna run modern streetcars down there too, go for it.