Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
Though I suppose if a woman's only goal in life is to attract a man (these still exist, right?), think of all the money she'll save on post-graduate education by just buying a box of hair color and some colored contacts.
This information is going to burst the "Blonde Bubble" !
Blue Eyes: $42.33
Master's Degree: $30.17
Does anal on the first date: Priceless
So the guy pays the woman that for a first date?
Is that what I'm hearing?
Or does he pay the "web site" and she gets a percentage of that?
I'd be curious to see what value women implicitly place on various features for men. Guessing earnings, height, intelligence, sense of humor, and kindness would be the top attributes, although some of these might difficult to convey on a dating site profile.
Don't even get me started on how much the Master's degree cost...
Choices.
Binder full of women didn't work for Mitt. It's not going to work for Brandon. Although, nice try getting free press from The Stranger. Even without mention of the website...
Welcome to Obama's America...
Besides, everyone knows a human body is worth over 200 grand for parts alone anyway.
I can assure you, most ladies have more requirements than that, some of them based on "superficial" attributes, height being the most obvious one. Also, it's interesting that compared to men, women tend to be resistant to the idea that the basis for their attraction can be systematized in any way.
"Check out that $245.57 over there. What a bitch!"
Women's attraction tends to be more based upon stability than physical attributes.
Women judge men on their job, social relationships, and ability to provide. Men tend to judge women on their looks. Of course, these are not the only attributes (men still look for stable women) but they are the most important to us biologically.
Is either sexist, is both sexist, is only one sexist, blah blah blah. When it comes to raw sexuality/attraction, we are basically animals...we do not get to choose or intellectualize what we like. If I do not date a woman because I think she is ugly, is that sexist? If a woman does not date me because of my crappy job, is that sexist?
Men and women are very different, anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to sell something or lying.
wich is why a father/mother parent set provides a very different family environment than a same sex couple
you are arguing with yourself?
or arguing just for the sake of making noise?
"Men and women are very different", remember?
are you now asserting that two men provide the same parenting experience that two women would that a man/woman would?
really?
OK. its your dime.....
('very different' may not mean what you thought it did.)
and by 'collected evidence' you must be referencing all the homoliberal junk science advocacy that parades as research.
please cite any legitimate study that PROVES that lesbian parents, gay parents and heterosexual parents provide family environments that are not different.
(remember, Danny repeatedly drags out his favorite "study" that he claims PROVES lesbians are better parents than heterosexuals.
remember that VenomWhore is always asserting how innately VIOLENT men are.
remember that the HHS study Al Frankum fwapped off to didn't examining homosexual parenting at all.)