@2 It was brilliant and hilarious, but I think it was also incredibly heartfelt and personal for Colbert, as it seemed a little outside his character's arc.
@1 Yes. The SLOG was totally mired in a deep and pervasive cover-up. Only your powerful and persistent sleuthing could uncover a conspiracy of silence that caused the endorsement of paper located in a swing state of seven whole electoral votes that are still trending towards Obama to be covered in the national news.
Going faster than light is not going "back" in time. Light takes time to travel, just like sound, or the US Mail.
What he is doing is transmitting information instantaneously...exactly at the time it happens. But not before. Although to those old time, "light viewers" it might seem that way.
Did someone just use "approbation" instead of "opprobrium"? That's the second time I've seen that misuse in as many weeks. What's up, everyone? Just because the two words both have a "pprob" in them doesn't mean they're the same word; in fact, they're almost exact opposites.
@1 Yes. The SLOG was totally mired in a deep and pervasive cover-up. Only your powerful and persistent sleuthing could uncover a conspiracy of silence that caused the endorsement of paper located in a swing state of seven whole electoral votes that are still trending towards Obama to be covered in the national news.
What he is doing is transmitting information instantaneously...exactly at the time it happens. But not before. Although to those old time, "light viewers" it might seem that way.
@3, I had that feeling too.
Do it, then you can check your watch.
Pics or it didn't happen.