Comments

1
on a recent trip to Barcelona I was quite surprised at the significant presence of police/military looking law enforcement, heavily armed, on transport, on the streets, in a multitude of "flavors" (different uniforms) - much higher than I've seen elsewhere in western Europe... just across the border in France you see no presence at all. struck me as odd.
3
"do you have Ms. Piggy?"
4
Because things that are considered supplements are always always always safe.
5
You have a Google alert for puppies, too?
6
Wouldn't San Juan Diego be the first Native American saint?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Diego
7
Please, people, if you care about your country and it's future and your own future, VOTE!
8
Building supplies includes steel pipe and wiring used to build the rockets that Hamas likes to rain down on Israeli civilians.

The sad fact of the matter is that Palestinians are used as a political pawn by their Muslim "brothers" to increase the religious hatred that is Islam.
9
@8 Nothing like religious bigotry to foster more devastation, horror & destruction, eh?
10
"things Palestinians aren't allow to have. "

Bullshit. All that stuff can be sent through the Red Cross/Red Crescent.
11
@9
Yea I tend to take an issue with those who want to push my people into the sea.
12
@11: ....or up into a mushroom cloud.
13
I have two acquaintances on Estelle now in Israeli detention... Henry Ascher a pediatrician and Dror Feiler a politician. You know @10/11 ("your people" facepalm me into a coma or something) its amazing the lack of facts you guys can sqeeze into so many words. The reason why for example Jews for Peace out of the Stockholm Synagogue are supportive for this specific project is that it has allot of actuall weight behind it, not to mention the negative effect the entire blockade has on Israeli security. The alternatives presented are just either impossible and naive or brutal and fanatical.

There is a reason why there is no presented Shining Path presented by StG (two state sollution, United Palestine Sollution or United Israel/Palestine Sollution), thats because the project goes beyond those specifics.
Its extremely easy to sit here and be all confident and calm about it (and I'm sure one of you will pull out your IDF service record at one point (or I would prefer that "my people")) - but the situation in Israel needs more than that. From the removal of the racist Knesset Laws (like not being allowed to run for election if you do not agree that Israel is a jewish state) to simple humanitarian aid, that as of now for some reason never really arrives (where the fault lies is irrelevant, lets just say that the UN have pointed some fingers).

These are not absurd demands and they are not unique.

PS "my people" Ive heard so many people use that as a prereq. for spitting out something really "hard line" and "commony sensy" too many times. From kids who call Palestinians in Gaza "their people" even though they have never even seen Gaza or speak more than a smattering of Arabic. But the genetics allow them to be all huffy about it and somehow magicly know everything. It excuses their machismo non-arguments and daft semi-lies in favor of some quick fix-all no one really buys anyway.

"lets bomb the US into a glass desert!" (yeah that would solve aaaaaall your problems) "lets just run those fucking arabs down for once and take it all back in one go" (mhm yeah...). A perpetual conflict run from abroad.
14
@12 I bet you or your kids won't volunteer to die for Israel. And I know Rmoney's kids won't.
15
@14: My quip doesn't imply that anyone's kids should fight for Israel. I know we all take liberties in our leaps to unstable conclusions to justify our impertinent retorts to impertinent quips, but really!
16

Moyers & Company: Plutocracy Rising (full video)
October 19, 2012



BILL MOYERS: Welcome. The new Gilded Age is roaring down on us, an uncaged tiger on a rampage. Walk out to the street in front of our office and turn right and you can see the symbol of it: a fancy new skyscraper going up two blocks away. When finished, this high rise among high rises will tower a thousand feet, the tallest residential building in the city.

The New York Times has dubbed it "the global billionaires club," and for good reason. At least of two of the apartments are under contract for more than $90 million each. Others, more modest, range in price from $45 million to more than 50 million.

Simultaneously, the powers-that-be have just awarded Donald Trump -- yes, that Donald Trump -- the right to run a golf course in the Bronx which taxpayers are spending at least $97 million to build. What “amounts to a public subsidy,” says the indignant city comptroller, "for a luxury golf course." Good grief. A handout to the plutocrat's plutocrat.

This, in a city where economic inequality rivals that of a third-world country. Of America's 25 largest cities, New York is now the most unequal. The median income for the bottom 20% last year was less than $9,000, while the top one percent of New Yorkers has an average annual income of $2.2 million.

Across America, this divide between the superrich and everyone else has become a yawning chasm and studies indicate it may stifle jobs and growth for years to come. At no time in modern history has the top one hundredth of one percent owned more of our wealth or paid so low a tax rate. But in neither of the two presidential debates so far has the vastness of this astounding inequality gap been discussed. Not by Mitt Romney, who is the embodiment of the predatory world of financial capitalism. And not even by Barack Obama, whose party once fought for working men and women against the economic royalists.



BILL MOYERS: Income inequality has soared to the highest level since the Great Depression, with the top one percent taking 93 percent of the income earned in the first year after the recovery, the first full year after the recovery. Why are the two candidates not talking about inequality growing at breakneck speed?

CHRYSTIA FREELAND: You know, I think because it is still a taboo in American political life and in American cultural life. One of the economists I talk to he works for the World Bank. And he said to me, you know, and he's a specialist in income inequality.

And he said, "When you go to think tanks you say you'd like to do a study about poverty, they say, 'That's fine. That's great. We're happy to fund it,' because writing about poverty makes everybody feel good and feel that they're being charitable and beneficent. But if you say, 'Actually, I want to study income inequality,' and even most dangerously, 'I want to study what's happening at the very top of the distribution," what Branko Milanović said to me is the think tanks immediately pull away because they say, "Our donors won't like it."

And that actually challenges the whole economic setup of the United States and of western capitalism. It’s very, very threatening. And I think that that’s why you've had the billionaire class. You know, the minute Barack Obama, I would actually say rather gently suggested that the millionaires and the billionaires should pay a little bit more, you had immediate cries of class warfare from the plutocrats. And very emotional. You know, there was an activist investor who sent an e-mail to his friends. The subject line is, "battered wives." And in the e-mail he compares himself and his fellow multi-millionaires to battered wives who are being beaten by the president. He actually uses those words.

MATT TAIBBI: And I thought it was really interesting in your book how you pointed out that Bill Clinton, himself, responded to Obama's criticism by saying, "You know, I would have done it a little bit differently. I think, you know, you can't attack these people for their success." And I think that's very relevant because if you go back in time, it wasn't always this way.

But I think the shift really began with Clinton and the New Democrats. I think after, you know, Walter Mondale lost in 1984, the Democrats decided, "You know, we're never going to lose the funding battle again." And they began this sort of imperceptible shift, where they continued to campaign on social issues the same way they had before.

They retained their liberalism in that sense. But economically, they began to side more and more with Wall Street and more and more with the very rich. And they've, I think we've now reached the point where neither party really represents the very poor in the way that the Democrats maybe used to. And so, that there's, that's why, you know, you don't see it in the debates, because neither party is really an advocate for that kind of left behind class anymore.



BILL MOYERS: Despite how the plutocrats have reacted to Barack Obama, he does not seem to be like FDR, taking on the economic royalists or like Theodore Roosevelt, fighting the guys he says are taking the country down. How do you explain Obama's attitude toward these plutocrats?

CHRYSTIA FREELAND: Barack Obama in many ways is one of them. He is educated the way a plutocrat is educated. He had an opportunity to join the plutocracy. He could very easily right now be a top corporate lawyer. And they know that.

He thinks the way they do. He's a technocrat in the accepted manner of the current plutocracy. And I think they like that. I think that's why he had such a strong reception in 2008. So I think that's one element. Another element though, and I think that this is something that sort of bothers them, is he isn't over-awed by them. And that kind of bugs them too, because they do think they’re pretty great.

MATT TAIBBI: To answer your question about, you know, why doesn't he take the sort of fist shaking attitude of an FDR or a Teddy Roosevelt, I just think Barack Obama has surrounded himself with people, like Larry Summers, like Bob Rubin. And I think he's accepted a lot of the justifications and the arguments that come from Wall Street and the business community.

So I don't think he feels genuine class based rage towards this community. I just don't think that's in him. You know, I think the-- if you listen to Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and the likes, they really believe that somewhere under there, there's this raging socialist. And, you know, there's Lenin ready to break out and put them all up against the wall in a firing squad. That guy just isn't there. He really is more one of them than they think.

BILL MOYERS: So you don't think he's fighting a class warfare as the right says he is?

MATT TAIBBI: Definitely not. No. No, I think he's very emotionally and culturally much closer to those people than he is to the rest of us.
17
Reminder: Presidential candidate Jill Stein will be appearing at Town Hall Seattle Sunday evening with WA state representative candidate Kshama Sawant.

Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson will be participating in two more debates:

● Monday -- During the final private debate between Obama and Romney, Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson will give their own answers to all debate questions in an expanded debate at Democracy Now!.

● Tuesday -- Free and Equal Elections Foundation will host a debate in Chicago between Jill Stein, Rocky Anderson, Gary Johnson, and Virgil Goode. This debate will be moderated by Larry King (who is currently accepting suggestions for debate questions on Reddit), and will be broadcast live on the Al Jazeera English network, as well as streamed live from the Free and Equal website, ORA TV, and RT.com.
18
@13
I am sure that the "Jews for peace" in Stockholm Sweden deal with daily rocket attacks and car bombings.

You Scandinavians sure have a lot of shit to talk for being a nearly homogenous Northern European culture who is well separated from the problems of the rest of the world.

Remind me of what Sweden doing during the holocaust again? Oh yea you were sitting there with your thumb in your ass. Despite all their faults at least the communist Russians fought against Hitler.

Sorry Israel fails to give voting rights to those who refuse to recognize it's existence.

@14
You don't wars by dying for your beliefs, you win by making someone else die for theirs.
19
Red Bull heir kills cop, buys off family for $97,000.

http://www.businessinsider.com/red-bull-…
20
"Remind me of what Sweden doing during the holocaust again?"

Oh, yeah and those Palestinians. What were they doing during the Holocaust?

NOTHING!!!!! So why are they paying for it?
21
@18 Does the name "Raoul Wallenberg" ring a bell? No? Well then, maybe you shouldn't talk about shit you clearly know nothing about.
22
@18 - pwned again. Why don't you go masturbate with your guns and spare the rest of us from your bullshittery?
23
Hey, while you all chatter, you ignore the FACT that Mars Opportunity is zapping Mars with lasers!

I guess we have three wars now: Afghanistan, Mars, and the pretend war by Rmoney against the USSR. Or Iran, which is folding under the EU gas embargo.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.