Comments

1
That's not even a 'playa'! That's a 'costa'!

I'm so disappointed that Wikipedia has lowered its lofty standards to this tawdry level.
2
Who cares what you were looking for. . .
3
Searching for Amanda Knox again?
4
Hmm... I thought Charles had a thing for blondes.
5
Charles, there are only two things you EVER look for on teh Interwebs: astronomical images and boobs...
6
Where are the white women at?
7

If it were a high res .PNG I'd be breaking out the screen wipes right now.
8
It says that the article "Swimsuit" is the only wiki page that references that image.
9
You know what else is weird? Look close to the main image for Bikini, the girl in the red dress with her hands behind her back.

In the shadows, you can clearly see that bondage chains were photoshopped out.

It's been there for YEARS.
10
The "sexy" bits of Wikipedia have been a battleground for years: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jackstuef/inside…
11
Look for the Royal Scottish entries.

Yowza!

Fnarf thinks they're all true ...
12
@9: Wow, you're right. That just made my day.
13
@9 holy smokes!

@8 I did an image search and got "flowered clothing", "monokini" and "swimsuit", all attaching to that image.
14
@9: Awesome.

This gem from the article on threesomes. Notice that the dude on the right is totally staring at the sack of the dude on the left. GAY.
15
Are you sure you won't say? This is - well - damn close to masturbatory perfection. One or two search terms? Pretty please?

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.