PPP poll yesterday shows Inslee even with McKenna.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/…

I work in a medical field, and one thing that is stressed over and over is that you don't allow your own religious views dictate the care you give to patients with different beliefs. If a doctor is a Jehovah's Witness, he cannot deny a blood transfusion, or anti-venom (often made with horse or goat blood) to a non-Jehovah's Witness patient.

Right there, where he elevates knowledge over belief, that’s where he’s won my vote.

And lost a hundred others.

@5 hey make that at least 2 to one hundred. McKenna says nothing because his belief wins over knowledge, he must be afraid of the voters like on so many issues. I can't see how he wins.

I really don't know what "science" would have to say about medical professionals providing this treatment. Science is amoral. Why is this framed as ideology vs. science? It's ideology vs. ideology, but politicians are too afraid to make any feminist arguments, so they hide behind nice, clean "science". This is cowardice.

@8,

This isn't just ideology. These pharmacists refuse to dispense Plan B because they falsely believe that Plan B terminates a pregnancy. It doesn't. It does what all hormonal birth control does, prevent ovulation in the first place.

These people aren't just religious nutcases; they're anti-science morons as well.

I definitely want a Governor who will stand up for women and see this so-called religious argument for what it is - the attempt to control others' lives - especially women's lives - in the name of God. I appreciate Jay's willingness to be a leader in this area AND his plans for creating jobs and improving education. He gets my vote!

"This is not a battle over religious freedom – it’s a battle to let science guide our discourse instead of ideology.

Yes indeed. And you could go further than this one pharmaceutical example, and make the claim that this, in a nutshell, is the basis of the battle currently being waged (the "culture wars") for the very heart and soul of America.

Yet another outrage against women seeking basic healthcare: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/health…

And yet Jay is doing nothing to contrast himself to McKenna. He needs to grow a pair and shop with the positive campaign nonsense. Jay needs to go negative on McKenna's ass and stay that way. Otherwise he's gonna lose and so will the citizens of the state.

Inslee's got my vote after this latest McKenna stunt with R-74's ballot title/description. Keep your religion out of the workplace, Rob.

What about licensed pharmacists who hold a sincere religious belief that all lifeforms are sacred and of equal worth in the eyes of God? Would this decision's reasoning absolve them from having to "actively participate in the taking of life" by filling prescriptions for antibiotics? Because if I've read it correctly, I believe it would.

In France, pharmacists may not refuse to stock or sell medications on personal grounds, including religious beliefs. The pharmacists' public duties as licensed professionals in open commerce trump their personal religious beliefs. In some US states, parents may with impunity allow their children to die by withholding medical care on religious grounds. The parents' personal religious beliefs trump their otherwise legally sanctioned duty to prevent their children from dying. I know which country's conception of religious freedom I think is more evolved.

@13: I've read elsewhere that the National Health Service has been diverting a lot of abortion work to private, for-profit clinics -- all part of the Tory/Lib-Dem dismantling and "marketization" of the NHS. Also, regarding the Daily Telegraph, I think this clip is still reasonably accurate:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGscoaUWW…

@ 9, 10, 12
Science doesn't tell us what to do. It gives us information with which to make these decisions. For instance, if a study came out saying that having children raised women's life expectancies 10 years, we wouldn't all blindly follow "science" and outlaw all birth control/abortion/etc. This is because our belief that women should have autonomy over their own bodies is not a scientific belief. It is a moral or political belief. Some science supports this belief as being good for women's health, a lot of science tells us HOW to give women autonomy over their own bodies. But make no mistake, science does not tell us what to do, and if we believe that it does tell us what to do, we are dangerously overlooking our own motivations.

@9 I wasn't aware that the basic facts about EC were under debate! oy. But I don't really think that's the crux of the issue. Rather it was the pharmacist's ability to refuse treatment if religiously opposed, and that would include birth control and other products.

So I for one am sending more $$ to the Inslee campaign.