Blogs Dec 22, 2009 at 11:09 am

Comments

1
If they can't tie it up in further appeals they'll settle.
2
Like anybody ever paid money for it in the first place. Suckers.
3
When you outlaw Microsoft Word... only outlaws will use Microsoft Word.
4
CLIPPY, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
5
Word is a piece of shit and always has been. Fuck 'em.
6
While I hate Microsoft Word with a burning passion, and would love for it to suddenly disappear from the earth, this case proves how stupid software patents are.

As applications move to the web, and smaller organizations start producing low-cost web application alternatives, large patent holders (including MS, Apple, and patent squatters) will be able to strong-arm the little innovators and shut them down based on obscure patent laws.

Software patents are a stupid and shameful business.
7
This is wonderful news. I just went through hell and back to get Windows 7 for my MacBook. I spoke to what were very likely the least helpful human beings alive over the course of several days.

Suck it, Microsoft.
8
@4- You'll be the only one mourning Clippy.

I figure the appeals process will keep this from becoming a reality.
9
This is some sort of karmic payback for the debacle that is Office 2007.
10
@9 - My thoughts exactly. I was hoping this would somehow result in a less god-awful product once they figure it out, but I'm not holding my breath.
11
Hey pee-wee, Word is the word of the day. Any time you hear it scream real loud. Let's give a try. Hey Chairy? What program is going to drag Microsoft stocks lower today?

....

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
13
This just might improve world productivity if it prevents upgrading from Office 2003 to 2007. I might just have to shell out to a third party to get my blamed toolbars and menus back.

YOU HEAR THAT? GET OFF MY LAWN YOU WHIPPERSNAPPERS!
14
@9, word. Er, Word. We're stuck on Word 2003 and my desire to change is approaching negative infinity.
15
And this well affect the local economy how?
16
@15 "Profits!"
17
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
18
First cursive writing, now Word. Soon it will be paper, driven by an overzealous concern for the wellbeing of trees, and we'll be back to clay tablets and styluses. Time to dust off the cuneiform.
19
@6 - um, Microsoftis teh small company being squished and ici is the large company holding the patent in your analogy?
I am suprised they haven't settled yet though, I guess ici is just biding its time.
20
@6 - um, Microsoft is the small company being squished and i4i is the large company holding the patent in your analogy?
I am suprised they haven't settled yet though, I guess i4 is just biding its time.
21
I don't see how they are going to win this appeal. It will be nearly impossible to prove i4i's invention was obvious - though maybe some prior art will be unearthed.

I'd be surprised if this drags out long. Office makes $200 million a week, and no one will buy it without Word. Expect a settlement any day now.
22
I still keep an old Mac around just so I can run Word 5.1 when I need to do things of moderate complexity on short deadlines without the goddamn software constantly trying to second-guess me.

I've spent considerable time trying to hunt down and kill all the default autocorrection "features" in newer versions of Word, only to have them STILL move text around, overselect, etc. Then when I actually want to invoke spell check, it can take another half-hour just to figure out how to enable it.

Any finger in the eye of Microsoft Office just makes me giggle maniacally.
23
Microsoft is its own worst enemy.
24
I've actually liked Word less with every revision since '97. The more "helpful" they make it for beginning users, the more frustrating it becomes for the rest of us.
25
I have no Word, my voice is in my Mac!
26
@20 Good job on avoiding the effort to understand the larger issue that I was talking about. MS can eat it and turn into a giant ball of fiery poo for all I care.

Software hurt the little shops. This is a rare case where the tables are turned.
27
@24, true except for one thing: images. Word 97 used to have this wonderful feature that if you were putting images in your document, especially if you had more than one or two, and nudged it just a pixel in the wrong direction, it would disappear. Only not really disappear; it would still be there, just with a left-align value of -19,000 inches or some such idiocy. You had to go into "Normal" view (which wasn't normal at all, and should never ever be used except for this purpose) and manually reset the values. If it let you. Half the time you literally could not get them to stay where you wanted them on the page.

Later versions are still kind of wonky, but nowhere near as horrible as 97.
28
You know, Constant, your histronic xenophobia is nice, I guess. As far as it goes. But it takes more than hating everything that isn't local to grasp economics.
29
@23 FTW.
30
The last several versions of Office, and I suspect future versions as well, were designed with "enhancements" that were really intended to solve internal problems at MS.

The "collaborative document" concept is really just a way to try to counter shitty management. Think about it: how often to you & 4 other people in 4 other time zones work on the same document at the same time? We all know how group projects like that turn out - the one smart & dedicated chick does all the work and a few others tag their name to it afterwards. The manager then takes all the credit for the "team" effort. MS is the world capital of Ineffective Middle Management Suck-Ups.

Rather than design a new door that can allow 8 bratty kids to enter all at once, how about getting off your ass and get the fucking kids to line up and enter in an orderly fashion?
31
Did anyone actually read the article? Including Paul Constant? Microsoft has a fix ready that's been in development since August. This is a non-event.
32
open office ftw
33
@30, that's not correct. What happens is, all four people make dozens of incompatible and contradictory changes, including hundreds that are just confused deletions and reinsertions of incorrectly-used punctuation.

At least one of these people MUST, by law, be unaware of the existence of the Tab or Enter keys, and just hold the space bar down until reaching the point in the document they wish to deface further.

All of these people must use the "track changes" feature, so that the "show changes on" setting results in a document that is completely unintelligible and takes up 30 pages for every one that will eventually print.

And when they are finished, they come and get me to fix it.
34
@33 Thanks for the correction. Though I think the larger point of "shitty management" still stands in your explanation.

Oh, and the "track changes" thing can't really be disabled, just the visual evidence of it. Look at a Word doc in a raw text editor, and you'll think you're looking at whale intestines.
35
31: I'm really hoping the linked article got silently updated. Otherwise this whole post and comment thread is beyond worthless. MS Word has a bunch of problems. SHOCK, HORROR.
36
Paying for those programs would be a bigger waste of money than buying Palin's book.

Open Office is the one and only tool you'll ever need for word processing n stuff. I think Microsoft Access still has some features that Open Office doesn't, but if all you're doing is a term paper, or a blog post, or...I dunno what the fuck do you ever use word for anyway? Open Office can do it, and it's free, Microsoft should find a new source of income and bundle the software already. Considering the absurd amounts of new bugs their current versions they should be paying me to test it.

Also, Word has been largely unchanged since the early 90's, making millions off that turns out to be a crime, who would have thought? :p

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.