Slog News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« Did You Lose Your Keys Last Ni... | Obama Wins Indiana »

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Michael Crichton

posted by on November 5 at 10:34 AM

Dead, of cancer, at 66. I know people never really respected him, but for mass-market thrillers, his books were really good. I’m speaking here of books like Congo (hyperintelligent gorillas!) and not books like State of Fear, which was maybe the world’s only global-warming-denial thriller, and which won him an award from oil companies. The book Jurassic Park, much more than the movie version, is a really fucking great thriller. That’s not an easy thing to write.

RSS icon Comments

1

I liked State of Fear.

Posted by Mr. Poe | November 5, 2008 10:39 AM
2

He does write a good thriller. Jurassic Park was a great book. One of his best and it rightly loved by the masses. I always say that Dan Brown is the poor man's Michael Crichton.

Posted by clearlyhere | November 5, 2008 10:41 AM
3

He told me he wrote potboiler prose on purpose--his role model was H.G. Wells (who actually had a far superior style). He wanted to use mass entertainment to hawk scientific ideas. Check out S.J. Gould's New York Review essay complaining that the movie version of Jurassic Park sold out the book's message, which was about the crucial importance of contingency. Spielberg et al. imposed a pop mad-scientist moral formula on the novel.

Posted by Tim Appelo | November 5, 2008 10:42 AM
4

He told me he wrote potboiler prose on purpose--his role model was H.G. Wells (who actually had a far superior style). He wanted to use mass entertainment to hawk scientific ideas. Check out S.J. Gould's New York Review essay complaining that the movie version of Jurassic Park sold out the book's message, which was about the crucial importance of contingency. Spielberg et al. imposed a pop mad-scientist moral formula on the novel. Also, Spielberg cast a director as the mad scientist, and made him nicer--he identified with him.

Posted by TIm Appelo | November 5, 2008 10:43 AM
5

He was the sf thrillers' Evelyn Waugh, becoming a hateful conservative as he got old and rich. Don't forget, though, that that guy once wrote "The Andromeda Strain".

Posted by --MC | November 5, 2008 10:44 AM
6

I've loved several of his books (the utterly bizarre Travels among them), but damn, I wish he had lived to offer me a personal apology for Disclosure.

Posted by Andrew B | November 5, 2008 10:47 AM
7

Sad. The Great Train Robbery was my personal favorite of his.

Posted by danhowes | November 5, 2008 10:47 AM
8

He'll be missed. Some of his earlier works (the andromeda strain, terminal man) were way outside the box at the time they came out. I hope nobody gives a sh*t about "State of Fear".

Posted by Lunchbox | November 5, 2008 10:48 AM
9

He was also the creator of the TV show ER (I can't believe it is still on the air), which might also make him responsible for George Clooney.

Posted by BenJ | November 5, 2008 10:57 AM
10

yeah, "travels" was interesting. he used to have an open mind.

Posted by ellarosa | November 5, 2008 11:03 AM
11

"He wanted to use mass entertainment to hawk scientific ideas". (Tim)

It certainly worked with me. I learned so much from his books. Like what the NTSB does from "Airframe". And how nanotechnology works in "Swarm". He will be missed.

Posted by Crichton Fan | November 5, 2008 11:08 AM
12

Congo was horrible. "They're smart. Too damn smart."

Posted by Bellevue Ave | November 5, 2008 11:10 AM
13

I also liked his "The Terminal Man" and his movies "Westworld" and "Coma" (written by Robin Cook).

Posted by elswinger | November 5, 2008 11:29 AM
14

Screw Jurassic Park. The Lost World was superior in every way. (Confidential to Jenn: the fractals and computer cube stuff is all in The Lost World, not Jurassic Park. In your face!)

Posted by Greg | November 5, 2008 11:34 AM
15

Oh, and "The Carey Treatment", which can be argued as the first pro-choice, movie.

Posted by elswinger | November 5, 2008 11:35 AM
16

eh we should mourn every right wing jerk with talent ?

Posted by PC | November 5, 2008 11:35 AM
17

Wow. I loved Jurassic Park & the Lost World as a kid, but after State of Fear I decided that he was dead to me.

I don't take it back.

Posted by julia | November 5, 2008 11:49 AM
18

The reports I read said he died "unexpectedly." Anyone else feel like that's pretty much how his novels ended, too? Quickly, abruptly, and unexpectedly. Maybe it was a fitting way to go.

Posted by Erik Hanberg | November 5, 2008 11:53 AM
19

Eaters of the Dead was a great book. Cardinal O'Connor especially like it.

Posted by The_Pope | November 5, 2008 11:56 AM
20

Jurassic Park is one of the few books I've read straight through in one sitting. An excellent read.

Congo, on the other hand, is time I wish I could have back.

Posted by PA Native | November 5, 2008 11:58 AM
21

@18, yes. I think his novels have almost uniformly terrible (perfunctory, random, suspense-killing) endings. What happened to the alien growth in The Andromeda Strain -- it just mutated and blew harmlessly away on the breeze or something? How undramatic. Jurassic Park's ending was weak but not enough to ruin the book. Sphere was almost even better than JP, then the last 50 pages wreck the whole thing. Congo and Eaters of the Dead were terrible from start to finish.

Posted by David | November 5, 2008 12:16 PM
22

Jurassic Park blew my 12-year-old mind, and I thank my dad for making me read it before we saw the movie. I liked Rising Sun as well, but the rest of his books were meh.

Posted by Jessica | November 5, 2008 12:50 PM
23

Yet somewhere, tree sap is hardening around a dead mosquito carrying his DNA.

Posted by sockpuppet | November 5, 2008 1:47 PM
24

I don't mourn now, because I think he was well past his prime (sometime in the mid-90s); I didn't expect him to come out with anything I'd want to read anyway. But I loved Andromeda Strain, Congo and Sphere when I was little.

Posted by another Andy | November 5, 2008 1:50 PM
25

I don't mourn now, because I think he was well past his prime (sometime in the mid-90s); I didn't expect him to come out with anything I'd want to read anyway. But I loved Andromeda Strain, Congo and Sphere when I was little.

Posted by another Andy | November 5, 2008 1:52 PM
26

I first read Jurassic Park in the 3rd grade right after the movie came out. It took me a month to read (I had to look up the word "paradigm" like 4 times before I got it) and gave me nightmares but I still read the same, battered, falling apart copy once a year.

Posted by Marq | November 5, 2008 2:13 PM
27

@9 we already have roseanne to thank for that.........

Posted by bitch, please. | November 5, 2008 9:14 PM

Add Your Comments





Please click Post only once.