<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on California Proposition 8 Too Close to Call, Leading</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca</link>
<description>With 29% of the precincts reporting, Proposition 8 is passing 52.9% to 47.1%. This is fucked....</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:26:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Jaxxi Hax</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Exit polls say otherwise...couples are racing to City Hall to get hitched just in case though. God, it breaks the heart.</p>]]></description>
<author>Jaxxi Hax</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194831</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194831</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:44:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The CHZA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>You guys are going to have to wait another decade or two for all of the "god ordained marriage" morons to die off some more before any progress can really be made on gay rights.</p>]]></description>
<author>The CHZA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194832</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194832</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:44:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Madashell</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I just don't get it - how could a blue state go this way? Is there any recourse, any viable challenge to Prop 8? </p>]]></description>
<author>Madashell</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194837</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194837</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:47:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ashley</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>we're coming a long damn way tonight, but this is still so disappointing. </p>

<p>still holding out hope for CA after watching the others go dowwwwwn.</p>]]></description>
<author>ashley</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194839</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194839</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:47:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by meloukhia</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As a Californian who voted no on 8, let me say that I am really disgusted by 8's lead right now. I'm hoping that things will balance out when full counts come in from more liberal areas. I can't believe that 53.2% of us were really willing to take civil rights away from their fellow citizens while voting in such a historic election. </p>]]></description>
<author>meloukhia</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194840</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194840</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:47:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by David</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It is totally fucked. Is it too close or is it over? I've been texted by Cali friends and they say it passed...</p>]]></description>
<author>David</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194841</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194841</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:48:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Parsnip</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I do not need to be crushed right now, not with my hopes so high.  Half of California voters, eat shit.</p>]]></description>
<author>Parsnip</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194842</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194842</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by tomasyalba</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The LA Times has a county-by-county rollover map thingy.  Looks tight even where Prop 8 is going down.  Los Angeles County is only at 16% reporting so far - but it's 54-45 yesward at the moment.  Blargh.</p>]]></description>
<author>tomasyalba</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194845</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194845</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:50:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by chris</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm so embarrassed by this. I have to call my gay friends to apologize for the other half of this state.</p>

<p>Unbelievable.</p>]]></description>
<author>chris</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194849</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194849</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:54:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bruce</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@3 - California isn't a "blue" state -- they usually go Democratic for President/Senate, mixed for the House, and Republican for Governor.  It's sad, but it doesn't surprise me.</p>

<p>@2 - (to paraphrase a guy interviewed on the  Slog awhile back):  Why can't they die FASTER?</p>]]></description>
<author>Bruce</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194850</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194850</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:54:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the LA Times:  "The proposition was trailing among white voters, but was ahead among black voters. Latino voters were closely divided."</p>

<p>"Every ethnic group supported marriage equality, except African-Americans, who voted overwhelmingly against extending to gay people the civil rights once denied them: a staggering 69 - 31 percent African-American margin against marriage equality. That's worse than even I expected. Whites, on the other hand, clearly rejected discrimination: 55 to 45 percent. Latinos were evenly split." -Andrew Sullivan</p>

<p>Thanks, Barack Obama, for everything so far!</p>]]></description>
<author>You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194854</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194854</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:56:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by lusk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes on 8 has been dropping from about 55% to about 52.5%...it's just a question of whether it will be enough to counteract before the night's over.  It got an early lead from a lot of rural counties in california that got their results in early, and a lot of urban centers aren't voting no as strongly as they might...</p>]]></description>
<author>lusk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194857</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194857</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Laura</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't despair quite yet - you have to look at WHICH precincts are reporting.  Rural areas have an easier time counting their votes and tend to report earlier, and they're usually more conservative.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Laura</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194860</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194860</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:01:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by seattleartist</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't forget Florida has a similar initiative on their ticket... it's winning by a huge margin too :(</p>]]></description>
<author>seattleartist</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194865</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194865</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kim</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Arizona is also banning gay marriage. Arkansas is banning gay couples from being foster and adoptive parents. Florida is banning gay marriage. </p>]]></description>
<author>Kim</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194867</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194867</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:08:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by scott</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This makes me want to move back to Washington - I am going to be too disgusted to live in California if this really does pass.</p>

<p>I suspect that this will get challenged in the US Supreme Court - it seems like it is illegal under the equal rights clause of the 14th Amendment.</p>]]></description>
<author>scott</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194876</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194876</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DFD</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>California has early voting by mail, right? Does anyone know if the reported totals include the mail-in vote?</p>]]></description>
<author>DFD</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194880</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194880</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:18:41 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by violet_dagrinder</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the huge black turnout is bad for gays. Sigh.</p>]]></description>
<author>violet_dagrinder</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194896</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194896</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:32:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by emote_control</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>From NBC's exit polls, if this thing doesn't turn around, it looks like the people to blame are uneducated hispanics and blacks over the age of 30.  They seem to be predominantly Republican (for some reason I cannot fathom) and Republicans are overwhelmingly likely to vote yes on Prop 8.</p>

<p>Also notable is the extremely dramatic shift at age 29.  Speculation: people who grew up with the internet are more tolerant.</p>]]></description>
<author>emote_control</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194898</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194898</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kim</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Good thing we just elected a president who supports gay marriage... oh wait.</p>]]></description>
<author>Kim</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194901</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194901</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:36:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by stealingzen</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I'm pretty sure a stupid Proposition doesn't have the clout that a State Supreme Court ruling can't trounce.  It might have to go to the Federal Supreme Court, but even on the state level, this Proposition can't be Constitutional, and therefore un-enforceable.</p>

<p>Look up, folks.  Have faith.</p>]]></description>
<author>stealingzen</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194902</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194902</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, remember, you're always welcome in Canada.  We had a nationwide referendum, and decided to support gay marriage, and then promptly forgot that it had ever been an issue.</p>

<p>Well, you might want to stay out of Alberta, but it's mostly good.  Come enrich our cities with your mostly well-educated, liberal-leaning, wealth-generating domestic partnerships.</p>]]></description>
<author>Rob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194903</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194903</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jrrrl</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh COME ON.  Obama was elected hours ago and you've already started blaming black people.  Blacks make up 7% of California.  The largest demographic group that overwhelmingly voted for proposition 8?  Males, who make up 48% of the population.  White women overwhelmingly rejected it, bringing down the "white" average.  If proposition 8 passes, it will be because of the huge voting blocs of male voters and evangelicals, not the 4%/3% split amongst black voters.</p>]]></description>
<author>jrrrl</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194924</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194924</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:12:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by charles</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm really upset about this. <br />
I'm a WA native going to school in idyllic (or so I thought) central California. I'm offended that the majority of people around me are so self-righteous and mean. 'Why? How does it possibly benefit you to restrict others from marrying those they love? Why do you give a shit?! Is it because the divorce rate is so high and teen pregnancy is especially rampant among evangelicals? Are you grandstanding in the defense of marriage because you know that it as an institution has already been shattered and bloodied by ill-advised shotgun wedding and midlife crises?! WHY??!?!!' I scream into the night.</p>

<p>Obama... obama... the mantra alleviates</p>

<p>Can straight couples get domestic partnerships? solidarity!</p>]]></description>
<author>charles</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194925</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194925</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sarah</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>this is just embarrassing, and sad, blame orange county...<br />
and lots of religious minorities out to support Obama, this has been a worry for a while.</p>

<p>the last bit of hope (rapidly disappearing) is that this shows a conservative bias in mail in ballots.</p>

<p>but it don't look good</p>]]></description>
<author>Sarah</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194926</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194926</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:17:53 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sarah</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>this is just embarrassing, and sad, blame orange county...<br />
and lots of religious minorities out to support Obama, this has been a worry for a while.</p>

<p>the last bit of hope (rapidly disappearing) is that this shows a conservative bias in mail in ballots.</p>

<p>but it don't look good</p>]]></description>
<author>Sarah</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194927</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194927</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gay in the CA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Don't count us out just yet... it's still a bit of a long shot, but LA county precinct closure map (updated every 10 minutes) showed almost all of West LA still not closed at 12:35.  They were finally closed by 12:45 and now are being driven to the counting stations with 1.7million votes to go for the county.</p>]]></description>
<author>gay in the CA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194942</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194942</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:50:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gay in the CA</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Just another illustration... at 2am, LA county shows 84% of precincts reporting for 2.1mil votes.  Estimated turnout was over 3.5mil votes by 8pm (not including those still in line), thus less than 66% of population represented.  Even the remaining Yes on 8 counties (San Bernadino, Riverside, San Diego) early results are skewing to the low population density areas rather than the more liberal and dense areas.</p>

<p>Plus, absentee ballots dropped off on election day are NOT counted until days later after signature verification.  Given the problems with getting absentee ballots out due to high turnout (and requests for mail-in ballots), there may be a large chunk still to count if it ends up close enough in the morning.</p>]]></description>
<author>gay in the CA</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194957</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194957</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:12:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sven</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>51.8 for yes with 82% in.  There's still an off chance but it isn't looking great.</p>]]></description>
<author>Sven</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194958</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194958</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:12:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zachd</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I want this to fail so bad.  The results from this have been killing me all night. Argh.</p>]]></description>
<author>zachd</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194972</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194972</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by guy</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>nooooo... ;_;</p>]]></description>
<author>guy</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194974</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1194974</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:16:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So what's the repeal process like? Surely this isnt the end of the fight. If it was the other way around, THEY wouldn't stop fighting. They would keep at it, submitting their signatures for another ballot initiative for another election..Gather your strength, kids, there's more work to be done. Let this just be a setback. Equality will come.</p>]]></description>
<author>Steve</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195002</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195002</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:52:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by George</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>v<br />
Voters in good old Calif. have rejected gay rights at the ballot, now, twice in ten years ...<br />
more work, more time</p>

<p>And we must avoid the ballot box at all cost ... we loose there big time, year after year, everywhere</p>

<p>Next, more attacks on gay adoptions. Another good winner for the christian right wingers.</p>]]></description>
<author>George</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195015</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195015</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kwebb</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>How can Californians vote for better treatment of animals, but not for us?  It adds a bitter moment to an otherwise very sweet.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/election/races/2008/11/04/CA/c/i_proposition/i_0_2_treatment_of_farm_animals/g_ballot_issue/c/california.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/election/races/2008/11/04/CA/c/i_proposition/i_0_2_treatment_of_farm_animals/g_ballot_issue/c/california.shtml</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/election/races/2008/11/04/CA/c/i_proposition/i_1_8_same_sex_marriage_ban/g_ballot_issue/c/california.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/election/races/2008/11/04/CA/c/i_proposition/i_1_8_same_sex_marriage_ban/g_ballot_issue/c/california.shtml</a></p>]]></description>
<author>kwebb</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195025</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195025</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jo Spot</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Christ guys, this sucks.  I've been screaming and drinking and celebrating but it's been in the back of my whole time.  My state... my giant, beautiful, diverse, 6th-largest-economy-in-the-world hippie-filled golden state... really?  Breaks my fucking heart.  So here's the thing: does anyone know what to do next?  How to we begin to fight?  </p>

<p>As cheesy as it sounds, I feel as though with obama in charge there is (*cough*) some hope, for... um... (*cough*) change... or a least an avenue through which we might begin to proceed.  It's such a day of hope and celebration right now and I really do believe that we will come up on these bigoted, fearful bastards some day.  That said, I'm 22 in california.  It's me!!  I feel like I'm the one that's gotta do something, and my generation, and my friends.  So what the fuck do i do!???!!  I feel like I can believe in change now, [insert cheesy obama cliche here] --how do we begin here?</p>

<p>The first money I've ever given to politics in my entire fucking life was $25 to no on 8 (thanks for the push dan!).  Wasn't enough.  I live in Santa Cruz, so protesting or educating around here isn't going to do a whole lot.  How do we begin to fight this thing?</p>]]></description>
<author>Jo Spot</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195034</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195034</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:21:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Peggy W</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it true that once it's part of the State Constitution, the courts cannot ever touch it?  I didn't join the rush to the altar because I had faith in my fellow Californians, faith which was obviously misplaced!!</p>

<p>How can such a happy day (Obama) be such a sad one?</p>

<p>I too want to know how we can proceed to fight this when it is obviously so WRONG!!!</p>]]></description>
<author>Peggy W</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195146</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/11/california_proposition_8_too_close_to_ca#c1195146</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:26:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>