<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on RapidRide Under Fire?</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire</link>
<description>Last week, the Daily Journal of Commerce reported that King County Metro&apos;s proposed RapidRide bus routes--the five &quot;bus rapid transit&quot; routes approved as part of 2006&apos;s Transit Now taxing measure--may not materialize. By 2010, when RapidRide buses are supposed to start running, the county will need another $60 million a year to run its transit division, &quot;and county officials do not know now where that additional money will come from.&quot; The DJC&apos;s story isn&apos;t quite accurate--the reporter apparently based her statements on some very general remarks about service cuts made by Metro general manager Kevin Desmond at a briefing more...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:45:33 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:24:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Too bad we don't have an income tax for the ultra-rich.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183781</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183781</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:48:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lionel Hutz</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Funny.  In Oregon, where local governments are also in financial trouble, elected officials there are bemoaning, as they call it, "the lack of a stable funding source like the sales tax."  Me thinks the grass is always greener on the other side.</p>]]></description>
<author>Lionel Hutz</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183803</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183803</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:08:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by gry mklsk</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Fuckin A   I may have to Rapid Fire Ride on back to Seattle   Last year I was interviewed by the Mercer County Newspaper  They sent a reporter to Ratapalooza   And I was quoted as saying   It's weird that there isn't a better turnout   Rats and mice have a lot to teach</p>

<p>And get a T-Shirt if you go  the design last year was RAD  oops RAT</p>

<p>Wassup Fnarf   er  Thorntorn</p>]]></description>
<author>gry mklsk</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183808</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183808</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lionel Hutz</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and another thing.  How is Surface-Transit as a replacement for the Viaduct supposed to work with less transit than we have today?  I thought the sales pitch was MORE transit to get people out of their cars, not LESS transit because we can't afford it.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Lionel Hutz</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183817</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183817</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:15:18 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ben Schiendelman</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Lionel, the 'surface/transit' option (it's not 'surface transit', it's surface and transit) would include state funding for transit.</p>]]></description>
<author>Ben Schiendelman</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183878</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183878</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lionel Hutz</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@5 - Right. So even if the state agrees to pay for transit over and above the level that qualifies as "construction mitigation" - which is the only transit service that state gas tax revenues are allowed to pay for without a constitutional amendment - if Metro can't afford to operate it's base level of service, how effective do you think a smattering of state funds toward transit will be?  And of course the state's financial picture isn't any rosier than the county's.  The last I checked, gas tax revenues were well below what the state had anticipated.</p>

<p>Hey, I'd like surface and transit to work, too - but I'm pretty realistic about what it takes in new investments to make it work.  Are you?</p>]]></description>
<author>Lionel Hutz</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183906</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1183906</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:20:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ivan</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@5, @6:</p>

<p>It won't work, because there wouldn't be  enough "surface" to accommodate all the  "transit." </p>

<p>Replacing the Viaduct with a new elevated highway will replace the surface we have now, and *will* work.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<author>ivan</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1184139</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/rapidride_under_fire#c1184139</guid>
<category>City</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:24:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
