Comments on Christopher Hitchens to Media: Stop Covering Palin

The media needs to stop covering Hitchens.

Palin should be as methodically reported as anyone else. Her despicable background should be broadcast factually. She is a throwback to barbaric times.
Yeah, I agree about Hitchens.

The I SAID THIS BACK IN ----- shit that you and Eli pull is so Blogger classic

Stop reporting on someone becaue of difference in politics? How Pravda-like is that!

It's not refusing to cover them, it's TRYING to cover them, which is not what is going on right now in the case of Palin.

@4 About as Pravda-like as broadcasting only one message, as is done with Palin every time she's reported on, because she's intentionally not being made available by her handlers to defend or support her lies -- just as the post says, you clearly overpaid (if this is the best you can do, and it seems to be) Republican shill.

The problem -- aside from being forced to kind of agree with Christopher Hitchens -- is that even if all sensible media drops coverage of Palin, she will still have the huge sideways megaphone known as Fox News etc.

Of course -- what would happen if Palin *only* ever appeared on Fox? Would people wonder what the gambit was?

On second thought, I bet that happens all the time.

Tie game.

It'd be nice if they could at least give a shout out to dan for putting it out there- sheesh!

Christopher who now?

yeah, I can see where it would really be a pain in the ass for Palin to be held accountable for what she says and does and that goes for all the fuckers supporting and covering her
another fucking sleepwalking fuck

I disagree. They are just covering the rallies inadequately. If you are going to show someone making strange claims, you should be willing to do a bit even handed analysis of the claims. It's the wholesale abdication of journalism that's the problem, not what they are covering.

Being as glib, self-satisfied, and dickish as Hitchens is hardly something to brag about.

.and just to clarify after MY glib, self-satisfied and dickish post, my point is that the mainstream media oughta ACTUALLY cover her.

Geez, does Katie Couric have to do EVERYTHING for you people?

That drunk marxist fuck Hitchens is responsible for this.

McCain's campaign crashed at the same time it declared war on the media. Coincidence?

"McCain's campaign crashed at the same time it declared war on the media. Coincidence?"

I seem to recall Mr McCain's campaign being declared dead by the media in June-July of '07. D'oh!

Mr Obama was, basically, declared elected by the media months ago; Mr McCain was supposed to run a gentlemanly Bob Dole-style campaign and then bow out gracefully; he would then have been anointed a "statesman" and thrown a few nods like he got when he ran against Mr Bush in the 2000 primaries.

But since that didn't happen, and an interloper disturbed the coronation, the most desirable course now is, of course, censorship.

One is reminded of the words that the great humourist Walt Kelly, creator of POGO, gave to Wiley Catt: "There's two sides to every question. And both of 'em's mine."

Jon Stewart gave the best analysis of this - he said the media these days is like six-year-olds playing soccer. There's no strategy, no positions, everyone just madly runs after the ball. For a couple of weeks, Sarah Palin had the ball. For 15 minutes or so, Sam Wurzelbacher or whatever the hell his name is had the ball. The mainstream media just runs around like dumbasses after whoever is "news" that week.