<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on By the Numbers</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1</link>
<description>In this morning&apos;s installment, a slightly old but very nice Wall Street Journal interactive graphic that shows how far ahead Barack Obama is in the overall money race—and how far ahead he&apos;s been every month since January. (Rumor is that Obama&apos;s financial report for September will show him to be a $100 million man.) Also: A new Politico poll finds Obama leading McCain in 3 out of 4 bellwether Bush counties. And: A new swing state poll finds Obama well ahead of McCain in Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: Colorado: Obama 52, McCain 43 Michigan: Obama 54, McCain 38 Minnesota:...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:28:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't McCain tapped out? By accepting the $85 mil of federal money, doesn't he forego any further fundraising? <br /><br />
Does it smell a little Goldwater around here?</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172258</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172258</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by rob</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Not to be a DICKtionary, but it's "bellwether" (no A)--the word "wether" is Middle English for a sheep, so it's a sheep with a bell on its neck, leading the flock.</p>]]></description>
<author>rob</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172259</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172259</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:29:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Old_Mama_Chips</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thank (insert proper diety here)!  Minnesotans have finally returned to their senses!</p>]]></description>
<author>Old_Mama_Chips</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172266</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172266</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:43:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by rococo</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>the washington post picked a bizarre picture to illustrate the '$100 million dollar man' article.</p>

<p>I've generally been less than enthused with the boy that cried wolf way people have been throwing around accusations of racism, but the whole black hand paycheck-forwarding vibe is off-topic for the article at the very least.</p>]]></description>
<author>rococo</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172268</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172268</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by meh</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This doesn't show the millions the RNC is spending to supplement McCain's advertising in contested states.<br /><br /> </p>

<p><i>"The RNC, which can raise and spend unlimited sums, has been supplementing McCain's TV ad budget in several states. The committee raised a record $66 million in September."</i>  -- <a href='http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-money13-2008oct13,0,547298.story' rel="nofollow">LA Times article</a><br /><br /></p>

<p>The article goes on to say Obama has a funding advantage even considering RNC spending... but that WSJ graphic does not show the whole picture.<br />
<br /><br /></p>

<p><br />
I just donated some more to Obama yesterday.<br /><br /></p>

<p>(Don't assume the cat's in the bag. It's fucking hard to get a cat into a bag, and even then the cat is likely to jump out. Sure, sometimes the cat will just go into the bag of its own accord, but I don't think this election is like that.)</p>]]></description>
<author>meh</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172277</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172277</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Julie in Chicago</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On the swing state polls... I was at a campaign event this weekend, and David Plouffe said that the campaign considers Michigan to be Strong Obama, Minnesota and Wisconsin to be Lean Obama, and Colorado to be a battleground (though he did say that they were very close to moving it to Lean Obama).</p>

<p>The states he categorized as Strong Obama states had 207 electoral votes, and the Lean Obama had 70.  So, in the campaign's view, without winning a single battleground state (NV, MT, CO, MO, IN, OH, NC, and FL), Obama will win the election.  </p>

<p>Which is, basically, the same thing fivethirtyeight.com has been saying for awhile, but for some reason it was more calming to hear it from him...</p>]]></description>
<author>Julie in Chicago</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172279</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172279</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by slim</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Meh, It's actually way easier to get a cat in a box.  You just leave it out on the living room floor, and they jump right in.  They are way easier to carry around in a box, too.  I don't know why so many people insist on using bags.</p>]]></description>
<author>slim</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172341</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172341</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:40:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by PC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>hey thanks @2.</p>

<p>turns out the usage of bellwether for a state that votes for the winner is not apt as that state isn't leading any other state.....</p>

<p>ok enuf etyquibbling.....</p>

<p>and yes the cat is IN the bag folks.</p>

<p>The real test however will be getting stuff passed after Pres. Obama wins.  So I suggest <br />
(a) keeping up all the yard signs<br />
(b) continuing the meetups and organizing and speaking out for change<br />
(c) spread your donations around to like Burenr and Franken etc., too.<br />
(d) join up your local Demo party they will all reorganize this January pls. ensure the party officers and delegates to DNC refelct your views<br />
(e) remember we will all have to push like hell for the long haul to get anything passed.....IOW view the election as the next hurdle and not the last.</p>

<p>They key is to change the frame most people use to look at politics and economics and stuff in our backwards, right leaning nation.</p>

<p>And get DC residents a fucking vote for christsake!!!!  2 more D senators most likely AAs!!  Why do we let Alaska have two senators and DC none?</p>

<p>Unity y'all--</p>]]></description>
<author>PC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172446</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1172446</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Seajay</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, so much for the GOP being the party of rich bastards!</p>]]></description>
<author>Seajay</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1173029</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/10/by_the_numbers_1#c1173029</guid>
<category>2008</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
