I still haven't finished Against The Day and it isn't for lack of trying. That book is incredibly dense.
"Against the Day" is his complete and total masterpiece. I remember thinking when I finished it that he doesn't need to write another word as long as he lives, but I'm fuckin' thrilled to hear that he will.
Rumors come and go. I hope this one's true. I enjoyed a lot of AGAINST THE DAY, but haven't been able to give it the re-reading that it deserves.
i've never been able to finish one of his books.
In film criticism, there is a saying which roughly goes, "there is no such thing as a bad film which is too short, or a good film which is too long." Which is to say that, if it holds you over its duration (whatever its duration) then its good. If it doesn't hold you then it's not good.
The editing corollary is that "time is audience capital." If you use invest this capital in the film, it had better pay off before people lose interest. The problem is determining how many of which people you can afford to lose. The hidden factor being whether the viewing audience can still feel their asses after a while.
So Paul, I take it that Pynchon, puts your ass to sleep?
If it's half as good as McCarthy's crack at the pulp crime novel, then hell yeah.
If you want a short Pynchon book you'll laugh all the way through, read The Crying of Lot 49. Definitely one of his two or three best.
Comments Closed
Comments are closed on this post.