Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on Yuck

1

hey, don't be so judgmental. nothing wrong with a little lipstick in your santorum. I don't vote for it though, I usually wipe it under the mattress.

Posted by jrrrl | September 27, 2008 5:36 PM
2

Holy Italian Girls coming over the Ben Franklin Bridge from Cherry Hill look, Batman!

"We have an opportunity to put government back on the side of the people and shake things up in D.C.," said Palin, who was garbed in a Phillies jersey, a white T-shirt and jeans with a leopard-print belt buckle.

Posted by John Bailo | September 27, 2008 5:40 PM
3

TRIFLING!

Posted by Bert | September 27, 2008 5:55 PM
4

Jesus Fucking Christ. What a worthless waste of skin.

Posted by Balt-O-Matt | September 27, 2008 6:00 PM
5

Hi all!
Nice site!

Bye

Posted by Edurpottepoto | September 27, 2008 7:15 PM
6

I was there with critical mass-- we did a bike lift in front of the pub and yelled and screamed and generally raised hell. There were a few angry little cops, but I don't think anyone got arrested.
A guy was yelling 'Sarah, I'd love you if you rode a fixie!" over and over.
There were tons of protesters and only a few unhappy looking pro-lifers. Palin is NOT welcome in this town.

Posted by Duellist | September 27, 2008 7:29 PM
7

correction: palin is santorum with lipstick MINUS 50 IQ POINTS.

Posted by ellarosa | September 27, 2008 7:43 PM
8

@7: true. Santorum is foamy toxic scum, but he can put consecutive sentences together with a decent grade of literacy. Nutzy Barbie cannot even do -that-.

Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber | September 28, 2008 2:24 AM
9

She has no business in a Phillies jersey.

This upsets me more than it probably should.

Posted by Jen | September 28, 2008 5:28 AM
10

She's such a phony.

Posted by Vince | September 28, 2008 6:43 AM
11

Popped in to enjoy the now-universal "Mrs Palin's a bad candidate because of how she looks." I don't recall any liberals ever enlarging at length on how Hillary Clinton looked when she was in the race. It's all liberals have after the initial wave of slime about her--the baby, the AIP, etc.--receded without sticking.

Posted by Seajay | September 28, 2008 7:37 AM
12

Seajay @11, "enlarging at length"?  little Freudian slip there?

Posted by lostboy | September 28, 2008 8:30 AM
13

seajay, you idiot, no one ever said she was a bad candidate because of how she looks. we made FUN of her looks at times (the hooker heels, etc.) but we made it pretty clear we thought she sucked because of what's between her ears. calling her on her looks is "all liberals have left"? hah! you mak-a me laugh. and your repugs are going down, fool--goin' down.

Posted by ellarosa | September 28, 2008 9:45 AM
14

I may never be able to wear lipstick again.

Posted by keshmeshi | September 28, 2008 10:00 AM
15

@8 said "Nutzy Barbie cannot even do -that-".

I thought she was NAZI Barbie?

Posted by Schweighsr | September 28, 2008 11:20 AM
16

I dunno about the lipstick in Santorum being so unexpected. Can't you imagine a really tanked drag queen engaging in a little post-coital felching? IT COULD HAPPEN!

Posted by Smartypants | September 28, 2008 12:45 PM
17

It's this comment that really made me ill: "I think she can relate to the common mom," said Olsen-Liney, who has a 3-year-old son with a neurological disorder that prevents him from speaking. "I like the fact that [she's] somebody who recognizes that not enough is done for special-needs children." I also have a special needs child. Back during the primaries (but after McCain was the only republican left) I checked out all three candidates stances on disability and special needs children. Obama and Clinton both had tons of information on their websites, including their views and their plans on how to help disabled people. John McCain talked about disabled vets, but other than that, zero! Nothing. I checked out his site today to see if Palin has inspired him to address this important issue. Nope. The only mention of special needs children on John McCain's site is in Palin's bio, where it says she'll be an advocate for special needs families. But no plan, no explanation of what that means, nothing! So cogratulations Christine Olsen-Linney from King of Prussia, PA, for not taking the time to find out which presidential candidate might actually have a PLAN to help children like your son, rather than empty rhetoric. [insert icon of Munch's "The Scream" here.]

Posted by snoozn | September 28, 2008 12:50 PM
18

@17: Palin will help families with disabled children because she has a disabled child, just like I will help veterans because I am one. That's really all the specifics you need to know.

Posted by John McCain | September 28, 2008 2:06 PM
19

I will be appointed to McCain's cabinet to oversee health care reform.

Posted by John McCain's Swollen Cheek | September 28, 2008 2:28 PM
20

Seajay..
There may be a few people concerned about Mrs Palin looks.......But many more are concern about her abilities. John McCain keeps saying he puts country first. Do you really think picking Palin is putting country first?

Posted by John in New York | September 28, 2008 2:53 PM
21

Hey! A Joke!!!

Q: Why does Sarah Palin walk funny?

A: Because her lipstick.

ROFLOLZ!!!

Posted by Brandon Burt | September 28, 2008 4:12 PM
22

#20: True, Mr McCain says he puts country first. I'm not going to put thoughts in his head by trying to say what he means by that. I will point out that Mr Obama says he's all about change, and then for his vice-president picks another Senator--one who's been in the Senate since Nixon was in the White House. I'm no more going to try to guess what Mr Obama means by that that guess what Mr McCain meant by his choice.

#12: YOUR slip is showing, friend! Hahaha!

#13: Thank you. When people like you call me names, I sleep better at night. My day isn't complete until I've been insulted by a liberal.

Posted by Seajay | September 28, 2008 7:42 PM
23

Maybe we should name some kind of sex act/substance/toy after Palin. Any suggestions?

Posted by Scabbers | September 29, 2008 8:06 PM
24

Maybe we should name some kind of sex act/substance/toy after Palin. Any suggestions?

Posted by Scabbers | September 29, 2008 8:06 PM
25

@24: Bare-backing, apparently.

Posted by flamingbanjo | September 29, 2008 9:23 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.