Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on You've Ruined it For Everybody Else

1

Good thing.

I wasn't going to read it anyway.

Posted by Will in Seattle | September 2, 2008 12:03 PM
2

Violation of her rights as a human being? Somebody alert the UN!

Posted by Gloria | September 2, 2008 12:06 PM
3

Only quality songs would be released?

Posted by The Peanut Gallery | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM
4

If I'm remembering correctly, Lupe Fiasco delayed Food & Liquor for fucking ever after its unfinished advance leaked for similar reasons.

Posted by Sam M. | September 2, 2008 12:17 PM
5

it's one thing to be annoyed. it's another thing altogether to take your ball and go home.

you know damn well that every 13 year old who reads the leaked version will still be at the midnight release party shelling out for the hardcover edition. she should be grateful for the attention.

Posted by geez | September 2, 2008 12:26 PM
6

To be fair this is more akin to uncompleted practice tapes of a band leaking than an album, but really, chill.

Posted by Oh my! | September 2, 2008 12:27 PM
7

Can we just start shooting people who leak books onto the internet? Is that cool?

Posted by Greg | September 2, 2008 12:27 PM
8

@7 - I hear King James stole the text for his King James Bible from someone ...

Posted by Will in Seattle | September 2, 2008 12:36 PM
9

Poor decision on her part. The leaked draft made me fall in deep sparkly love with Twilight all over again, completely erasing the bad taste Breaking Dawn left in my mouth.

Thanks for ongoing coverage with just the right amount of serious/snark, Paul. Much appreciated.

Posted by giantladysquirrels | September 2, 2008 12:39 PM
10

If she doesn't want people to read the unfinished version I really doubt that ensuring that it's the only version available is somehow going to accomplish that.

What the hell does she mean her rights as a human being? I'm no expert, but I'm pretty darn sure that copy and patent rights are not considered actual human rights, legal frameworks for settling disputes sure, but not really essential to survival.

Posted by Super Jesse | September 2, 2008 12:49 PM
11

Oh hey and is she then going to return all the money the publisher has advanced her for this book? One of the links claims that readers returned copies of the prior installment of this series & critics were uncomfortable w/ its "right to life" aspects... I confess that I've read none of these books, but isn't it ironic to encounter "right to life" issues in a 'teen vampire' series?

Posted by E | September 2, 2008 12:52 PM
12

@8: Yeah, Wycliffe and Tyndale translated the Bible into English first, but your comparison is entirely fatuous. Oh hell, why am I bothering. FOAD.

Posted by Greg | September 2, 2008 12:53 PM
13

Seems a bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face... after all, she's only hurting her own bottom line. Those who leak or read leaked material won't be effected at all. They just move on.

And right now I'm just thanking my lucky stars J K Rowling didn't withhold The Deathly Hollows because it leaked... which seems very business savvy, since such a move would have resulted in a lot more people reading the leaked version then actually paying for it.

Posted by UNPAID BLOGGER | September 2, 2008 12:57 PM
14

Yeah, well Stephanie Meyer violated the rights of vampires everywhere with her slander disguised as "fiction."

Posted by PopTart | September 2, 2008 1:08 PM
15

People are reading less and less these days. Yet, occasionally a series of books come out that people (for whatever reason) want to read.

And then the author gets all high and mighty about artistic whoseywhatsit and pulls the book from being published. You'd think she'd cling to her audience while she has it. Goddamn, what a moron.

Posted by Original Monique | September 2, 2008 1:58 PM
16

@12 - it's GFOAD and you know it.

That said, one of my high school classmates is trying to write a book right now and every day or so she says something like "only wrote three paragraphs, what a wasted day".

Writer's block sucks, but coming up with a lame argument for not publishing your work is ... lame.

Posted by Will in Seattle | September 2, 2008 4:51 PM
17

Those kinds of leaks are internal. Someone close skrewed him.

Posted by Sirkowski | September 2, 2008 5:07 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.