Comments on That Lawsuit Against Sound Transit...

That is great. We should use that in the Prop. 1 campaign.

So what's Plan B if this one doesn't pass?

@2: Grab some boxes and help Microsoft move to the cool side of the lake?

Dude, we should try to roll in some kinda measure about funding more taco trucks. That would be awesome.

I bet when Central Link opens, #4, we'll see more taco trucks surrounding those stations.

We better.

On behalf of all the other Wills in Seattle, I'd like to thank the judge for slapping that Will upside the head.

Boo ya!

Kemper Palin

@2

plan B would be busses.

busses are overcrowded now. we need more busses. we need more frequency. we need shorter busses we need more express busses we need nicer first class busses we need to lower the cost of commuting serve commuters now and spending most of the dollars on large construction projects that don't bring serve for many years isn't what we need now when we have a population ready to jump up in transit market share, but not enuf busses now.

Also: busses can go everywhere. light rail as proposed only goes somewhere.

@8: You're absolutely right. We should never build permanent infrastructure, because its benefits will be delayed by several years. We can't replace 520 or the Viaduct! People need to get through those corridors NOW!

Sadly, the reason we DON'T have permanent rail infrastructure right now is because people used the opposite argument 30 years ago - we shouldn't build it because nobody uses it right now. That turned out well, didn't it?

Two things are clear:
1. Mr. Knedlik is a very angry man.
2. Mr. Knedlik is fortunate that he has a steady target against which he can launch his venomous attacks. Otherwise, his head might explode.

What a sad way to for a man to live his life.

This so proves that there needs to ba a $1,000 filing fee for any lawsuit. How much public money and time is wasted by these anit-social nitwits like Knedlik.