Sex Good Morning!
posted by September 25 at 10:30 AM
onThe New York Times illustrated an arts short about the proposed musical adaptation of American Psycho with this picture of Christian Bale from the 2000 film version of Bret Easton Ellis’ 1991 novel.
There are worse ways to start the day than with a perfectly gratuitous shot of Christian Bale’s unbelievably sexy armpits, abs, shoulders, tits, etc. This photo only appeared in the print edition of the NYT, though, so web-only readers missed out. Keep the eye candy coming, NYT photo editors, and I’ll never let my subscription lapse.
Comments
Hmmm... nicely toned muscles, but he needs a little fat to round out those hard edges. More bacon for that boy!
jesus, shaving the chest is bad enough, but the armpits, too?
@2...doesn't that sort of go with the character he's portraying?
Bale is hot...but I never can find him too sexy after recalling watching him in "The Machinist"...
I'm guessing the pubes got buzzed too. Never saw the movie.
I'd drink his bathwater...
Why must you insist on calling men's pectorals "tits"? It is off-putting to say the least.
That makes me insecure.
At least I have found ladies that like burly men.
That can't be real, can it? Holy shit.
The abs are the best part of this shot... particularly the lower ads. I would like to lick something off of them.
So that's his trick to staying cut: Just flex all of your muscles all of the time--even when you're laying down.
No. That is too much. He is too ripped. Not for me.
Yikes.
Maybe it's the lighting but it kinda looks like his skin's been flayed off.
I let my NYT subscription lapse just yesterday and no amount of naked Bale is going to get me back in their good-graces. I still get the Sunday Times but, sweet Jesus, the weekday editions are mostly unreadable and packed with advertisements. I loved you NYT, but I have to let you go. You kind of suck now.
He's the goddamn Batman, folks.
Comments Closed
Comments are closed on this post.