Wow... Any chance of the Stranger adopting this crazy "isnít advocacy journalism" there are two sides every issue policy?
Or does that only apply to daily papers reporting on drug enforcement stories related to marijuana?
I agree with you about this issue, Dan, but one thing bothers me. How is this different than the attempts to find balance in political reporting? As in "McCain is lying, but Obama also partially misleads people" type of balance. If you insist on balance on this issue, don't you have to insist on it in political reporting too?
@1: Nope. We don't do that kind of journalism, and never have, and have no interest in that kind of journalism. You can be fair, of course, and honest, without being in denial about your POV, biases, etc.
Thank you for playing Slog.
Why then expect (demand?) that kind of journalism from the PI?
I wrote a letter to the PI after the last stupid yay-war-on-drugs story and told them that they should be holding themselves to The Stranger's standard! Because, from reading the Stranger/Slog, I knew that there were two sides to this story. I also knew which side the Stranger writers were on, which is helpful in making up my own mind.
If I were just reading the PI, I wouldn't have known there were two sides, and only in finding that out elsewhere can I deduce what their bias is.
I much prefer the additional information and clarity, personally.
As do I. But I find that additional information and clarity valuable on other topics also. And it's not consistently provided here (or, for that matter, in many other places). I concur with @2.
We're only asking the PI to do the job it, and other dailies, praise themselves for doing. We're asking them to hold themselves to their own professed standards, not to ours.
I don't think the Slog is particularly balanced. But I tend to think that the Stranger's overall news coverage is. . . well, imperfect, but much better than most. Which is saying a lot. We are talking about a free weekly run by a sex advice columnist. The fact that I learn more from them than I do from the PI. . . either the Stranger should be proud, or the PI should be extremely embarrassed, or, you know, both.
So this means that when Eli or Erica write a well-ballanced and thought-provoking news story we should call them out on it for not being childish, immature and one sided?
At least Shukovsky can finally get a good night's sleep knowing he's made the potheads happy.
Comments are closed on this post.