Sex The Italians
posted by on August 5 at 10:54 AM
If a new report is to be believed, it seems a quarter of all Italian couples regularly take part in wife swapping.
The revelation comes not from the seedier quarters of the country that gave the world Casanova, but from the usually po-faced pages of national broadsheet La Stampa. According to yesterday’s front page article, entitled “The Lunch Time Swingers”, an estimated 500,000 Italian couples are officially swapping partners at private sex clubs, with thousands more doing it in a more ad-hoc fashion in car parks, specially designated beaches or even cemeteries.
Note One
I wonder what the percentage is for American couples?
Note Two
Recall the best passage in the Communist Manifesto:
Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.
The percentage is COMMUNISM DOESN'T WORK AND IS A BUNK PHILOSOPHY percent.
Why can't Dan lace his eye-candy posts with pseudo-intellectual bullshit too?
Makes me feel like less of a perv.
Dude, you dont get it. Reeall Communism hasnt been tried yet.....
Well, sheesh, who'd be satisfied with only the daughters and wives of the proletariat anyway?
Ummm . . . shouldn't the term be 'husband-swapping?' Or better yet 'partner-swapping?' Or even better 'partner-sharing' or 'intermittent poly-amorous dalliances of short duration?'
Why is the reference point the husband and his 'control' of and permission to 'swap' his wife for a different model.
Oh ECB where are you?
Please post photos of your slapping Mr. Mudede for his unforgivable heterocentric, male chauvinist elitism.
Dear Chaz,
Free association is great when put to use for good. However, you only use it to post pictures of ladies in various states of undress.
Get a room.
@6: What exactly is your definition of "good"?
@5. Agreed. Wife swapping implies ownership of the wife by the husband, or at the very least, complete passivity on the part of the wife in the swapping arrangement.
wack wack wack. post. wack wack wack. post. huh charles?
I don't buy this.
I think what happens is, like the French, people don't get divorced even when they're sleeping with other people.
You can use statistics to prove anything, especially when you misuse them.
As to who is being swapped - it's probably a sliding scale, depending on who's involved.
no one cares Chucky, just be honest for once, open a porn site and drop the faux-intellectualism, you aren't fooling anyone
Poor Charles, torn between his desperation to screw Italian women and his fantasy of being a true Communist.
Nice rack there Charles, but how did you keep your bra from falling off??
Mucilage.
Dear Charles Mudede:
Girl, you crazy.
makes you wonder what his Google image search was... "big tits Italy", "Italian sluts", "nsfw Italian"? and which came first: the search or the text to justify it...
>If a new report is to be believed, it seems a quarter of all Italian couples regularly take part in wife swapping.
What all can you swap them for? I could really use a rice booker and a bicycle.
magnificent breasts. edifying. thank you, charles.
That is a lovely quote -- it manages to highlight all the worst aspects of Marxism:
@13 - yeah, but some of those communist Italian women are hot!
Boobs-a-lot, boobs-a-lot,
Do ya like boobs-a-lot?
Boobs-a-lot, boobs-a-lot,
YES, WE LIKE BOOBS-A-LOT!
@14: Spirit gum. Tool of the, uh, hovering bra trade.
in other findings, 23% of Italians enjoy pulling pollsters' legs.
for me, it's the sculptural armpits in the image. i really could careless about the breasts.
Being openly poly, I've found that people feel safe confiding in me about their "arrangements". This is so common that I've come to believe that monogamy is almost an urban legend. Truly monogamous couples are, by far, the exception. Most people who aren't cheating have some sort of 'extras' allowed. It's pretty remarkable how many people are keeping the reality of their relationships totally under wraps.
I know what you're thinking. Did he make six references to Marx in this post, or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is SLOG, the most self-referential blog in the world, and would drive you bat-shit crazy, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky?
Well, do ya, punk?
@17,
That's Monica Bellucci. Charles has posted her image more than once.
@26: Social consequences, don't'cha know.
@27--- your scientific methodolgy needs a little help there. If they are monogamous, they are not going to play with you, so it sort of skews your data.
s/b @26 (sorry)
I feel silly making fun of these posts, but holy shit, are they awful.
Not as awful as the, uh, "architecture" posts, but still pretty goddamn embarassing.
i fucking hate charles. he makes me absolutely sick.
Quit encouraging him, and maybe he'll go away, collapsing under the weight of his own illogical and ineffective efforts to justify his pseudo-intellectual existence, kinda like communism itself . . .
Though I must confess to some fondness for Ms. Bellucci, as well . . .
Did Marx molest his domestic servant? For some reason I think he wasn't quite as pure as he claimed to be on that one.
Comments Closed
Comments are closed on this post.