You may be too polite to say this, Eli, or maybe you don't agree, but I'd suggest that the ultimate driving principle behind these protesters is an overweening sense of exhibitionism and ego.

They probably don't know shit about 1968 -- newsflash protesters: a Daley is not a morning newspaper.

Please use your powers of investigation to discover why leftists are protesting the policies of the centrist Democratic Party. I can't think of one single issue where a dyed in the wool leftist would not be 100% thrilled by the Democrats. Are they just crazy? Are they just ignorant youngsters who don't have years of wizened experience like you, Mr. Insightful Reporter Person?

I'm flummoxed!

Thank you so much for helping me understand this confusing world.

Things don't always come in nice neat packaged boxes.

When he was 12, Billy Jean King wiped the floor with a certain male tennis player, ending the myth of male dominance and changed the face of sports options for girls forever.

It's as much a part of him as it is of his wife - and thereby his daughters.

This is as good a start as any in developing those thoughts for me and I thank you for it.

Only one of the groups here is called Recreate 68. There are several other including Funk the War and Tent State. There are also immigration rights groups, environmental groups, etc, etc.

You have a point about some of the demonstrators, but many of them also have a point - that while the Democratic Party says some of the right things, they don't always do them, and they need to be held to the fire to keep them on the right track. We all thought the US would be so much better if the Dems took over the House and Senate, but the promises prosecuting the criminals in the Bush administration, or getting out of the war, closing Guantanamo, increasing environmental standards, universal health care, etc, etc, etc, have once again gone largely unfulfilled.

Also, look at the lack of progressive policies happening in our own state - where the dems control the House, Senate and Governorship. The Stranger often writes about the no-action Dems in Washington, why are you so hopeful the Dems will be so much better when in sole control of the other Washington?

Bottom line is that while there are some truly progressive Dems, the party as a whole could do better and needs to be reminded what people expect of them. Especially on foreign policy, where the Dems look a lot like the R's if you live in the Philippines, East Timor, Palestine, or Burma. Open Dem support of Indonesia (even by our own Patty Murray) while they were committing genocide in East
Timor isn't something people should be happy about.

Yes, Obama holds some hope for people, and I am also excited about his potential. But, his first major choice is Joe Biden, an establishment Dem who voted for and strongly supported Bush on the war. Should we really be naive enough to think that Obama will be the real progressive saviour, or will he more likely be another Bill Clinton, compromising on almost every liberal position while promoting things like NAFTA and breaking unions.

I met several protesters, and aside from being part of demonstrations here, many of them are working on some pretty heavy issues, including one who is fighting for the rights of immigrant sheepherders in Colorado, an issue completely ignored by Dems in this state.

We'll see what Obama brings. But don't dismiss the protesters, it's possible we all could be joining them in 4 years, they were right when they were protesting the invasion of Iraq, while many Dems were supporting it.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. You just aren't getting it, are you?

Logan's Run

Ditto. If you want to create chaos and get yourself arrested please do it in St. Paul. You have to win power first before you can change anything - baby steps people - defeat the empire first then worry about nitpicking everyone else later

That's just stupid.

And more:

The youngsta generation hasn't won anything yet; you haven't "beaten" the boomers; the election is in the fall remember? We need every vote possible for Obama and right now it's tied so this isn't really a competition between generations. It's a competition between Obama nd MCain and part of that is whether or not Obama and his supporters are going to actually unify the Democrats and this kind of post totally ignores the fact that the Democrats, ahem, need lots of votes of middle aged folks and older folks. And more unity. Not a made up age-war.

The protestors don't have a large crowd because most folks old and young know protesting in the street is a fairly ineffective method for persuading anyone. The 1968 protests were a huge mistake by the left as they helped ensure in 1968 that the swing voters went with the GOP and they pretty much have done so ever since, usually.

So, boomers aren't interested in protesting because it's dumb, not because they are deflated after being vainquished by the next generations in the primary season.

That's vainglorious, it's clear they're handing out acid in Denver and Eli's taking it.

Oh meanwhile there's no Biden bounce and the race is all tied up now in the Gallup daily tracking poll. So I wouldn't be reveling about Obama quite yet-- maybe we should all try to unify, and fucking elect him, first?

Just a thought.

Yes, it's our responsibility to hold our elected officials accountable. We've got tons of left-wing attack groups who do that constantly (high-profile guys even, like John Stewart, Kos, etc.). Eli's point is about the extremely inapt parallel to '68. It just doesn't hold water. It's great if you want to go to the convention to get warmed up for Burning Man or something but you need to be very specific about what your complaints are, and simply saying "This is just like '68!" kind of drowns out any other message you might have.

I'm not arguing to support the Recreate '68 theme, I'm saying they are not the only group here, and to write off all the demonstrators' issues because of the name of one of the splinter groups isn't really a fair take on the protesters.

I'm not one of those people holding out for Clinton or unhappy that Obama's the nominee, but this is really oversimplifying the primaries and ignoring that Obama's victory was by a relatively slim margin. To pretend that the post-boomers won in such a landslide that the "old guard" is now irrelevant is a dangerous fiction. Maybe by 2012?

Jesus, Dominic. What the fuck is Hempfest doing in Seattle then? Shouldn't they be protesting in a place that needs enlightenment? Of course, then you'd have to ask what the fuck Critical Mass is doing in bike-friendly Seattle. But we don't question The Stranger's darlings.

I don't much agree with these DNC protectors, but the way the Stranger reports on this kind of thing is utterly conventional. Might as well be reporting for the TV news. I can't wait for you guys to find somebody who sounds like an idiot on videe so you can post it here. Then chuckle and feel superior.

http://twitter.com/politicswest

The Denver Post also has live reports over at denver post .com /live

The twitter one in particular is quite active.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/8/25/at_t_throws_party_to_support