Also, this restores my faith in porn. They are actually straight college dudes! Who knew there was any validity to that?

Seriously, what do these guys get paid for a one-off gig like this? A thousand bucks tops, maybe? Most certainly a one-time fee, so it's not like they're getting a cut of the profits if their performance happens to be a particularly big hit among website patrons.

Do the proprietors of these sites actually fly the boys to gigs, or do they just set up shop in popular spring-break destinations and troll the streets for young men gullible enough to give a wank for what must seem like a big wad of cash under the circumstances?

It doesn't matter how much of a hottie you are, or how indifferent you think you are to being seen nekkid or to being jerked off to by gay guys everywhere. In the long haul of life, it's not worth it.

And I think it's an admirable solution to the problem. Saying athletes can't use pictures of themselves for commercial purposes covers all grounds with an elegant simplicity, without actually having to tacitly acknowledge anything unsavory.

"Epic wank session"

awwwwsum

"Safety in numbers"? Whah? "...And most will go on to become doctors, judges, congressmen, etc. without anyone ever making a connection between them and their past." Whaaaah? This is based on what?

The long history of doctors, judges and congressmen who have posed for gay porn in the past and escaped detection? I guess if that's your argument, there's no way to disprove it. Then there's potentially scores of doctors, judges, and congressmen who have posed for gay porn in their youth, but since they've never been caught, there's no way to quantify this outrageously high number.

Or are we just talking about the long history of doctors, judges and congressmen who have posed for gay porn and escaped detection since the Internet has become such a phenomenon within the last ten or fifteen years? Now that you mention it, I THOUGHT that guy with the ripped abs looked a lot like Strom Thurmond.