<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on I-26: The Republican Cloaking Measure</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure</link>
<description>King County Council Member Larry Gossett—an opponent of Initiative 26, which would make all county elected positions nonpartisan—says he thinks &quot;it will probably pass.&quot; “People think it supports good government, and voters don’t want people to be partisan,” Gossett says. The measure would make countywide races, including the council and executive, nonpartisan. But I-26 is an elephant in sheep’s clothing. The only chance Republicans have of winning countywide races is if voters don’t know that the schmuck they’re voting for is a Republican. An alternative measure introduced by the council would allow candidates to state their party preference. The primary...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:58:40 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:38:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Emmett</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm too lazy to check the PDC website right now, but was there a no campaign? Usually if someone throws enough "no" information out there, people will end up voting no, not necessarily because they're convinced its a bad idea, but because they're unsure.</p>]]></description>
<author>Emmett</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108852</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108852</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:53:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by J. Whorfin</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Some questions I want to throw out there for the group:</p>

<p>If non-partisan races work for cities, why not the County?  </p>

<p>Does Gossett really think that some not-labeled-as-such Republican will be elected in the 2nd District, or conversely, a Democrat elected in the 3rd or 9th?</p>

<p>Don't Councilmembers get elected pretty much on "slick advertising, pretty pictures, and name familiarity" now?</p>

<p>Even if some Councilperson who is 'out of touch' with their district is elected, won't that (in theory) self-correct in the next election? </p>]]></description>
<author>J. Whorfin</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108857</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108857</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:03:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan Savage</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Do non-partisan races really work for the city? Do non-district races? Does this wacked out system of having no districts, but seats, work for the city?</p>]]></description>
<author>Dan Savage</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108862</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108862</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:21:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Algernon</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No progressive thought I -200 was  progressive. It was sold as an anti-affirmative  action measure.</p>]]></description>
<author>Algernon</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108879</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108879</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:11:16 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by J. Whorfin</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dan @ 4: I wasn't trying to be snarky; I truly haven't made up my mind.  That said, I understand Gossett's point, but I don't see how passing I-26 will result in some Republican take over of KC government, given the make-up of the County.</p>]]></description>
<author>J. Whorfin</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108927</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108927</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:44:07 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Gay Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a big win for Republicans which stands to pick up future seats on the County Council with this bill. When there is no info about a candidate's political party Republicans will win countrywide elections almost every time. They are amazing at being able to get their info out about candidates to every R even in D districts but without the Dems being able to use it against the candidate. I am always amazed at their ability to do this with Judge candidates such as Jeanette Burrage who was rated Not Qualified but actually won because she was so conservative.</p>]]></description>
<author>Gay Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108934</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108934</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:58:14 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I would have said the Republican cloaked candidates are great at lying about who and what they are, GS.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108988</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/i26_the_republican_cloaking_measure#c1108988</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:38:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>