Slog: News & Arts

RSS icon Comments on City Council Members Push to Close Ethics Fine Loophole

1

Translation: "Even though I it, I don't want to appear to be the kind of person that would do that."

Posted by Dougsf | August 28, 2008 4:59 PM
2

That's such a douchebaggy way of saying sorry.

Posted by Giffy | August 28, 2008 5:03 PM
3

Hmm. You know, lots of professionals are required by their codes of conduct to avoid conflicts of interest both real and perceived. Why shouldn't it be the case for city councilmembers and other public servants? In their case it's even more important.

Posted by Greg | August 28, 2008 5:29 PM
4

If it hadn't been politically unacceptable, he would have done it - which is still ethically unacceptable.

That attitude by itself is politically unacceptable to me. A ten year old knows you don't pay private fines from the public treasury.

Posted by StC | August 28, 2008 5:41 PM
5

Lets not forget that Jean Godden, had an ethics and elections fine for using her city of seattle financed office to run her last campaign...Did she pull a McGiver and use city funds to pay her fine?...Never mind, I forgot that she has the Senior's Demented Downtown Developer's free pass...

Posted by whatever | August 28, 2008 5:48 PM
6

1. McIver should have apologized without condition for the original offence.
2. He should have paid the fine with his own money. Otherwise, it means no Council Member could be fined for an ethics violation while in office. Creating a mandate for corruption.
3. The other Council Members, if they had any integrity, should have censured McIver imediately.
4. There isn't a loophole. McIver obviously and blantantly violated the spirit of the law. (To argue otherwise is to say that the Citizens of Seattle should pay all ethics fines for accepting mediocre leadership.) And yet, he remains a lawmaker passing judgement on how the rest of us should and must live our lives.
5. Bullshit!

Posted by Zander | August 28, 2008 9:24 PM
7

Wait a sec. I am not done.
If McIver really, honest to god thinks, he has a winning case let him sue the city.
If he wins he will be exonerated. If he loses it will be jail time.

Richard?

Don't you have an obligation now to clear your name?

I am totally looking forward a public examination of all Council/Contractor relations.

Posted by Zander | August 28, 2008 9:33 PM
8

Wait a sec. I am not done.
If McIver really, honest to god thinks, he has a winning case let him sue the city.
If he wins he will be exonerated. If he loses it will be jail time.

Richard?

Don't you have an obligation now to clear your name?

I am totally looking forward a public examination of all Council/Contractor relations.

Posted by Zander | August 28, 2008 9:49 PM

Comments Closed

Comments are closed on this post.