<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Burner Claims a Mandate for Change in the 8th District</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th</link>
<description> Speaking to a mass of cheering (and noticeably young) supporters here at the Mustard Seed in Newport Hills, eastside Democrat Darcy Burner said that the primary vote count shows a demand for change in the 8th District. &quot;More than 50-percent of the voters are voting for change,&quot; Burner told the SECB after addressing the crowd. As the SECB stood scratching its head trying to figure out how Burner&apos;s current 44-percent of the vote equals &quot;more than 50-percent,&quot; a supporter filled us in on the new math: Burner and four no-chance challengers collectively have just under 53-percent of the vote,...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:35:52 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:07:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by Daniel K</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Eli - this isn't a pure head to head when there are 4 other candidates in the field eating up votes.  How hard is that to understand?</p>]]></description>
<author>Daniel K</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108913</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108913</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Zander</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Darcy's new math also works against her, since more than 50% did not vote for her.  Kind of bad form to predicate your progess on an arguement that works against you.  Also going by the numbers what does it mean that the majority of voters did not vote?</p>]]></description>
<author>Zander</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108925</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108925</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:40:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Daniel K</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Zander - there is merit in the case against an incumbent if he doesn't get 50%.  Look at all the other congressional races where the incumbents are all winning by huge margins.</p>

<p>But none of this is a surprise.</p>

<p>Turnout is likely to be around 41%, which would be 4% less than in 2004.  That's hardly a ringing endorsement of Sam Reed's "top two" primary experiment.</p>]]></description>
<author>Daniel K</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108932</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108932</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:52:02 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Zander</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel you've explained it slightly better.<br />
Why not just say that any incumbent who lacks the confidence of 50% of the voters after two terms needs to call it quits.  Especially, in a primary vote.</p>]]></description>
<author>Zander</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108937</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108937</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:01:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is just pure head.</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108941</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108941</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:15:57 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>No, that would be the Terry "WASL Or Die" Bergeson campaign, Mr. Poe.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108979</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1108979</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:27:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Poe</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Will, one day...</p>]]></description>
<author>Mr. Poe</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109091</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109091</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kurisu</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If you add Darcy to the other candidate who picked a Democratic party preference, you get almost 49% picking a Dem vs. Reichert's 47.5%   He could certainly say he won the primary, but he's privately shitting his pants.</p>]]></description>
<author>kurisu</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109113</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109113</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:12:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fnarf</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I wish Amy Kate was here to get rid of those hideous dashes in "50-percent" and the like.</p>]]></description>
<author>Fnarf</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109149</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109149</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:51:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>@7 - don't worry, Mr. Poe, I'll help you study for the WASL.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109189</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109189</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RonK, Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, an overwhelming majority of 8th District (primary) voters are in favor of pluralities.</p>]]></description>
<author>RonK, Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109227</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109227</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:48:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by StC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Darcy Burner is hot.</p>]]></description>
<author>StC</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109252</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/08/burner_claims_a_mandate_for_change_in_th#c1109252</guid>
<category>Election Night</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:07:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>