....the fuck?

Going off of the PDC website, I've got Randy Dorn taking in $3,280 in out-of-state money. Bergeson, I've got down for $7,575.

That's one dumb-ass criticism there, Alex Hays.

Down with WASL!

I need to meet Mr. Hays. I have an attitude to deliver too.

Doesn't look like he's losing by 20 points anymore :). And when you add up the "oh god, anyone else votes" it's looking pretty bad for her. Blomstrom got 4 percent of the votes, and, well, google him.

The substance of this slog post comes as no surprise to me whatsoever. The admittedly crappy newspapers in this town know (and the TV stations) that they can say what they want about candidates as long as it is framed as an op-ed piece. When their "reporting" stays separate there is still some pretend line between fact and opinion. The Stranger refuses to follow even this most childish of divisions and then acts surprised when the candidates they taunt for weeks on end don't want to see them?

In the same vein, the Times and PI make endorsements but their websites are not headlined with "who you should vote for" for the 3 days before the election.

Next, posting slog entries on your own site under the 'Stranger Election Control Board' instead of admitting the potential bias of who is writing it?????

A) If I cared about your opinion I would have already voted against Bergeson.

B) Taking no responsibility for who is posting gives you ZERO credibility.

C) For the record, as I was stumped on a particular race while filling out my ballot I read the voter's pamphlet and was still at a loss. I then checked the ECB guide and voted for the OTHER person.

These posts only make your "newspaper" look petty and spiteful.

Let's put a simile on that test!

When are you guys going to understand that you aren't a real news source? What candidate is going to take the "Stranger Election Control Board" seriously? Let the real media do the election coverage.

1. SECB finds political engagement by people much older than they are inherently humorous.

1. SECB finds political engagement by people much older than they are inherently humorous.

2. SECB finds political engagement by people much younger than they are inherently humorous.

3. SECB finds political engagement by differently-abled people inherently humorous.

Were SECB a middle-school lunchroom clique, we'd make broader allowances.

and they are right

the kiss of death, WEA in elections??

Has Bergeson ever explained why it is the testing company that keeps jacking-up the price it charges our state to grade the danged WASL continues to "win" the contract to score it? Could it possibly be the thousands of dollars its executives have spent through the years supporting Bergeson's campaigns???